Deltagelse i frivilligt arbejde og tidsforbrug på frivilligt arbejde

Hans-Peter Qvist
{"title":"Deltagelse i frivilligt arbejde og tidsforbrug på frivilligt arbejde","authors":"Hans-Peter Qvist","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V26I2.5048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ifolge ressourceteorien om frivilligt arbejde er personer med mange personlige, sociale og kulturelle ressourcer mere tilbojelige til at deltage i frivilligt arbejde og bruger mere tid pa det. I denne artikel viser jeg imidlertid ved hjaelp af en to-dele-model, som mindre hyppigt anvendes i den sociologiske frivillighedsforskning sammenlignet med Tobit-modellen, at to af de mest centrale ressource-indikatorer, uddannelse og hyppig kontakt med medlem-mer af ens sociale netvaerk, har positive effekter pa sandsynligheden for deltagelse, men ikke pavirker tidsforbruget givet at man deltager. Eftersom analysen viser, at to-dele-modellen, som adskiller deltagelses-beslutningen og tidsbeslutningen, stemmer bedre overens med data sammenlignet med Tobit-modellen, som antager en simultan beslutning, er der formodentlig snarere tale om to beslutninger, som skyldes forskellige faktorer. Resultaterne af analysen indikerer, at deltagelsesbeslut-ningen afhaenger af hvor mange ressourcer individet har, mens tidsbeslutningen snarere afhaenger af hvor meget tid personen har til radighed, nar der tages hensyn til arbejds- og familieliv. \n \n \nENGELSK ABSTRACT: \n \nHans-Peter Y. Qvist: Participation in Volunteering and Time Use for Volunteering: Two Sides of the Same Coin? \n \nAccording to the resource theory of volunteering, people with many personal, social, and cultural resources are more likely to participate in volunteering and spend more time on it than people with fewer resources. In this article, however, I show that two of the most central resource indicators education and frequent contact with members of one’s social network, have positive effects on the probability of participation, but do not affect time use given participation. I do this by using a two-part model, rather than Tobit-models, which are the most often used in sociological research on volunteering. The two-part model, which separates the decision to participate from the decision about how much time to spend, fits the data better than the Tobit-model, which assumes one simultaneous decision. This is probably because different factors explain the two decisions. The results of the analysis indicate that the decision to participate is dependent on the amount of resources the individual possesses, while the time decision is dependent on how much time is available to the individual when considering work and family life. \n \nKeywords: volunteering, time use, Tobit-model, two-part model, selection model.","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk psykologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V26I2.5048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Ifolge ressourceteorien om frivilligt arbejde er personer med mange personlige, sociale og kulturelle ressourcer mere tilbojelige til at deltage i frivilligt arbejde og bruger mere tid pa det. I denne artikel viser jeg imidlertid ved hjaelp af en to-dele-model, som mindre hyppigt anvendes i den sociologiske frivillighedsforskning sammenlignet med Tobit-modellen, at to af de mest centrale ressource-indikatorer, uddannelse og hyppig kontakt med medlem-mer af ens sociale netvaerk, har positive effekter pa sandsynligheden for deltagelse, men ikke pavirker tidsforbruget givet at man deltager. Eftersom analysen viser, at to-dele-modellen, som adskiller deltagelses-beslutningen og tidsbeslutningen, stemmer bedre overens med data sammenlignet med Tobit-modellen, som antager en simultan beslutning, er der formodentlig snarere tale om to beslutninger, som skyldes forskellige faktorer. Resultaterne af analysen indikerer, at deltagelsesbeslut-ningen afhaenger af hvor mange ressourcer individet har, mens tidsbeslutningen snarere afhaenger af hvor meget tid personen har til radighed, nar der tages hensyn til arbejds- og familieliv. ENGELSK ABSTRACT: Hans-Peter Y. Qvist: Participation in Volunteering and Time Use for Volunteering: Two Sides of the Same Coin? According to the resource theory of volunteering, people with many personal, social, and cultural resources are more likely to participate in volunteering and spend more time on it than people with fewer resources. In this article, however, I show that two of the most central resource indicators education and frequent contact with members of one’s social network, have positive effects on the probability of participation, but do not affect time use given participation. I do this by using a two-part model, rather than Tobit-models, which are the most often used in sociological research on volunteering. The two-part model, which separates the decision to participate from the decision about how much time to spend, fits the data better than the Tobit-model, which assumes one simultaneous decision. This is probably because different factors explain the two decisions. The results of the analysis indicate that the decision to participate is dependent on the amount of resources the individual possesses, while the time decision is dependent on how much time is available to the individual when considering work and family life. Keywords: volunteering, time use, Tobit-model, two-part model, selection model.
参与志愿服务和花费在志愿服务上的时间
根据志愿服务的资源理论,拥有大量个人、社会和文化资源的人更有可能参与志愿服务,并在志愿服务上花费更多时间。教育和与社交网络成员的频繁接触这两个最核心的资源指标对参与的可能性有积极影响,但并没有表明参与的时间。由于分析表明,与同时做出决策的Tobit模型相比,区分参与决策和时间决策的两部分模型与数据更为一致,因此这很可能是由于不同因素造成的两个决策。分析结果表明,考虑到工作和家庭生活,参与决策取决于个人拥有多少资源,而时间则取决于个人有多少时间进行激进。Hans-PeterY.Qvist:参与志愿服务和志愿服务的时间使用:同一枚硬币的两面?根据志愿服务的资源理论,拥有许多个人、社会和文化资源的人比资源较少的人更有可能参与志愿服务,并在志愿服务上花费更多的时间。然而,在这篇文章中,我发现了两个最核心的资源指标——教育和与社交网络成员的频繁接触,对参与的概率有积极影响,但不影响参与的时间使用。我使用了一个由两部分组成的模型,而不是托比特模型,托比特模型是志愿者社会学研究中最常用的模型。由两部分组成的模型将参与的决定与花费多少时间的决定分开,比假设同时做出一个决定的Tobit模型更适合数据。这可能是因为不同的因素解释了这两个决定。分析结果表明,参与的决定取决于个人拥有的资源量,而时间决定取决于在考虑工作和家庭生活时个人有多少时间。关键词:志愿服务,时间使用,托比特模型,两部分模型,选择模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书