{"title":"Stadier på Sociologiens Vej: Søren Kierkegaard og Samfundsvidenskaberne","authors":"Bjørn Thomassen","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V26I3.5055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Denne artikel skitserer Kierkegaards indflydelse pa sociologien i det 20. arhundrede. Med udgangspunkt i den ungarske sociolog Arpad Szakolczais metodiske begreb om sociologiens ”baggrundsfigurer”, argumenteres det, at Kierkegaard ofte har udovet en ”skjult”, men afgorende indflydelse pa en lang raekke taenkere inden for den klassiske sociologi, sasom Simmel, Mannheim, Weber, Adorno og Frankfurterskolen. I forlaengelse heraf argumenteres det, at Foucaults sene forfatterskab udviklede sig i en intim dialog med Kierkegaards skrifter. Derfor bor Kierkegaard ogsa anerkendes som en noglefigur for den kritiske teori. Artiklen har som overordnet mal at klargore Kierkegaards relevans for den sociologiske teoridannelse og den nutidige samfundsforstaelse. \n \n \nENGELSK ABSTRACT: \n \nBjorn Thomassen: Stages on Sociology’s Way: Soren Kierkegaard and the Social Sciences \n \nThe aim of this article is to ascertain Kierkegaard’s relevance for sociological theory formation as well as diagnostic understandings of contemporary society. The article surveys Kierkegaard’s influence on sociology in the 20th century. Drawing on the Hungarian sociologist Arpad Szakolczai’s methodological concept of ”background figures”, it argues that Kierkegaard has often exercised a ”hidden” but decisive influence on a series of thinkers in classical sociology, including Simmel, Mannheim, Weber, Adorno and the Frankfurt school. The article also argues that Foucault’s late authorship developed in an intimate dialogue with Kierkegaard’s writings. For these reasons, Kierkegaard must also be recognized as a key figure for critical theory. \n \nKeywords: Kierkegaard, Mannheim, Simmel, Weber, Foucault, critique.","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"26 1","pages":"79-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk psykologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V26I3.5055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
Denne artikel skitserer Kierkegaards indflydelse pa sociologien i det 20. arhundrede. Med udgangspunkt i den ungarske sociolog Arpad Szakolczais metodiske begreb om sociologiens ”baggrundsfigurer”, argumenteres det, at Kierkegaard ofte har udovet en ”skjult”, men afgorende indflydelse pa en lang raekke taenkere inden for den klassiske sociologi, sasom Simmel, Mannheim, Weber, Adorno og Frankfurterskolen. I forlaengelse heraf argumenteres det, at Foucaults sene forfatterskab udviklede sig i en intim dialog med Kierkegaards skrifter. Derfor bor Kierkegaard ogsa anerkendes som en noglefigur for den kritiske teori. Artiklen har som overordnet mal at klargore Kierkegaards relevans for den sociologiske teoridannelse og den nutidige samfundsforstaelse.
ENGELSK ABSTRACT:
Bjorn Thomassen: Stages on Sociology’s Way: Soren Kierkegaard and the Social Sciences
The aim of this article is to ascertain Kierkegaard’s relevance for sociological theory formation as well as diagnostic understandings of contemporary society. The article surveys Kierkegaard’s influence on sociology in the 20th century. Drawing on the Hungarian sociologist Arpad Szakolczai’s methodological concept of ”background figures”, it argues that Kierkegaard has often exercised a ”hidden” but decisive influence on a series of thinkers in classical sociology, including Simmel, Mannheim, Weber, Adorno and the Frankfurt school. The article also argues that Foucault’s late authorship developed in an intimate dialogue with Kierkegaard’s writings. For these reasons, Kierkegaard must also be recognized as a key figure for critical theory.
Keywords: Kierkegaard, Mannheim, Simmel, Weber, Foucault, critique.
克尔凯郭尔的小品演员Denne artikel在20岁时就已经成为了一名社会学家。阿。医学博士Arpad Szakolczais metodiske在克尔凯郭尔的“skjult”演讲中开始了社会学的“baggrundsfigurer”,他说,在克尔凯郭的演讲中,人们对社会学、sasom Simmel、Mannheim、Weber、Adorno和Frankfurterskolen的演讲感到惊讶。我在Foucaults的一次对话中与Kierkegaards skrifter先生进行了交谈。克尔凯郭尔(Kierkegaard)的名字是一个名字。Artiklen har som overordnet mal at klargore Kierkegaards relevant for den socialogisteridannelse og den nutidge samfunds for staels。英格尔斯克摘要:比约恩·托马森:社会学道路上的阶段:索伦·克尔凯郭尔与社会科学本文的目的是确定克尔凯郭耳与社会学理论形成以及对当代社会的诊断理解的相关性。本文考察了20世纪克尔凯郭尔对社会学的影响。它借鉴了匈牙利社会学家阿帕德·萨科尔扎伊的“背景人物”方法论概念,认为克尔凯郭尔经常对古典社会学中的一系列思想家产生“隐藏的”但决定性的影响,包括西梅尔、曼海姆、韦伯、阿多诺和法兰克福学派。文章还认为,福柯后期的作者创作是在与克尔凯郭尔作品的亲密对话中发展起来的。由于这些原因,克尔凯郭尔也必须被公认为批判理论的关键人物。关键词:克尔凯郭尔,曼海姆,西梅尔,韦伯,福柯,批判。