Nytteaktiveringens retfærdiggørelse. Et pragmatisk sociologisk blik på aktivering af arbejdsløse

M. Nielsen
{"title":"Nytteaktiveringens retfærdiggørelse. Et pragmatisk sociologisk blik på aktivering af arbejdsløse","authors":"M. Nielsen","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V25I1.4807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artiklen tager teoretisk afsaet i den franske, pragmatiske sociologi og demonstrerer, hvordan denne kan benyttes til at skitsere en pluralitet af forskellige moralske positioner i danske offentlige debatter om aktivering af arbejdslose. Et bredt uddrag af den offentlige debat om sakaldt nytteaktivering analyseres, og pa baggrund heraf skitseres fire forskellige forstaelser af den legitime sociale orden, som aktorer traekker pa i den pagaeldende debat. Det drejer sig om henholdsvis en industriel, en markedsorienteret, en projektorienteret og en orden orienteret mod medborgerskab. Artiklen demonstrerer, hvordan aktorer, der traekker pa forskellige moralske principper, gor positive moralske domme over nytteaktivering som praksis. Hermed udfordrer artiklen en af feltets hidtidige antagelser, nemlig at de forskellige positioner i aktiveringsdebatter fungerer som gensidigt begraensende. \n \n \nENGELSK ABSTRACT: \n \nMathias Herup Nielsen: Activation of the Unemployed Seen Through the Lens of Pragmatic Sociology \n \nThis paper demonstrates how French pragmatic sociology can be applied to grasp a plurality of orders of worth that come into play when actors engage in disputes about activation policy programs targeting unemployed people. Drawing on an archive consisting of around 300 articles from a Danish public dispute about a specific activation policy program, the article describes four different sets of principles of justice that actors rely on in the actual dispute. These four sets of principles are described as the industrial polity, the market polity, the projective polity and the civic polity. The article shows how a pragmatic sociological approach can serve as an alternative to monistic approaches, stressing that a plurality of orders of worth are present in contemporary workfare debates. In addition, the article concludes that actors, relying on very different orders of worth, all seem to justify the specific activation policy program. \n \nKeywords: pragmatic sociology, Luc Boltanski, justification, activation, unemployment.","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"25 1","pages":"9-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk psykologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V25I1.4807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Artiklen tager teoretisk afsaet i den franske, pragmatiske sociologi og demonstrerer, hvordan denne kan benyttes til at skitsere en pluralitet af forskellige moralske positioner i danske offentlige debatter om aktivering af arbejdslose. Et bredt uddrag af den offentlige debat om sakaldt nytteaktivering analyseres, og pa baggrund heraf skitseres fire forskellige forstaelser af den legitime sociale orden, som aktorer traekker pa i den pagaeldende debat. Det drejer sig om henholdsvis en industriel, en markedsorienteret, en projektorienteret og en orden orienteret mod medborgerskab. Artiklen demonstrerer, hvordan aktorer, der traekker pa forskellige moralske principper, gor positive moralske domme over nytteaktivering som praksis. Hermed udfordrer artiklen en af feltets hidtidige antagelser, nemlig at de forskellige positioner i aktiveringsdebatter fungerer som gensidigt begraensende. ENGELSK ABSTRACT: Mathias Herup Nielsen: Activation of the Unemployed Seen Through the Lens of Pragmatic Sociology This paper demonstrates how French pragmatic sociology can be applied to grasp a plurality of orders of worth that come into play when actors engage in disputes about activation policy programs targeting unemployed people. Drawing on an archive consisting of around 300 articles from a Danish public dispute about a specific activation policy program, the article describes four different sets of principles of justice that actors rely on in the actual dispute. These four sets of principles are described as the industrial polity, the market polity, the projective polity and the civic polity. The article shows how a pragmatic sociological approach can serve as an alternative to monistic approaches, stressing that a plurality of orders of worth are present in contemporary workfare debates. In addition, the article concludes that actors, relying on very different orders of worth, all seem to justify the specific activation policy program. Keywords: pragmatic sociology, Luc Boltanski, justification, activation, unemployment.
公用设施激活的理由。关于激活失业者的实用社会学观点
这篇文章的理论基础是法国实用主义社会学,并展示了如何利用这一点来概述丹麦关于激活失业者的公开辩论中的多种不同道德立场。分析了关于缺乏效用激活的公开辩论的大致摘录,并基于这四种对合法社会秩序的不同理解,行动者在有关辩论中所依据的社会秩序。它们分别是工业型、市场型、项目型和公民型。本文展示了行动者如何利用不同的道德原则对效用激活作为一种实践做出积极的道德判断。因此,这篇文章挑战了该领域迄今为止的一个假设,即激活辩论中的不同立场是相互限制的。英语摘要:Mathias Herup Nielsen:从语用社会学的视角看失业者的激活本文展示了法国语用社会学如何应用于在行动者就针对失业者的激励政策计划发生争议时发挥作用的多个价值顺序。这篇文章引用了一份由大约300篇丹麦公共纠纷中关于特定激活政策计划的文章组成的档案,描述了行为者在当前纠纷中所依赖的四套不同的正义原则。这四套原则被描述为产业政策、市场政策、投射政策和公民政策。这篇文章展示了语用社会学方法如何作为一元论方法的替代方法,强调在当代劳动福利辩论中存在多种价值顺序。此外,文章得出结论,参与者依赖于非常不同的价值顺序,似乎都证明了具体的激活政策计划是合理的。关键词:语用社会学,波尔坦斯基,正当性,激活,失业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书