Society as an Institutional Form of Social Reality

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
{"title":"Society as an Institutional Form of Social Reality","authors":"","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-18-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the controversial issues associated with understanding the category of “society”, which is of key importance for reflective social philo­sophy and theoretical sociology. The author criticizes the extremely broad inter­pretation of society as a social reality – a substantively independent subsystem of the world around us, isolated from nature and different from it. Society is understood by the author as an institutional form of the existence of social rea­lity – a self-sufficient human collective capable of producing and reproducing all the necessary conditions for the individual and collective existence of peo­ple, including their formation as social beings. The author views society as a real social group consisting of interconnected people who carry out joint coor­dinated activities aimed at realizing common interests and goals. The point of view is criticized, which denies the ontological reality of society, considering it as an “imaginary community” of people, a product of their project conscious­ness. The author criticizes the approach according to which the interpretation of society as a real group is not applicable to a society divided into classes with multidirectional interests that cause permanent conflicts between their carriers. The author analyzes the phenomenon of self-sufficient existence, which distin­guishes society from non-self-sufficient social groups, distinguishes between actual and potential forms of self-sufficiency, examines its real content associ­ated with the production of subjective, material, informational and organiza­tional elements of social life necessary for its maintenance. The article exam­ines the polemics of representatives of “methodological individualism” and “methodological collectivism” associated with the interpretation of society as an integrative subject with its own needs, interests and goals that are absent from the people who form the society.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-18-28","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article examines the controversial issues associated with understanding the category of “society”, which is of key importance for reflective social philo­sophy and theoretical sociology. The author criticizes the extremely broad inter­pretation of society as a social reality – a substantively independent subsystem of the world around us, isolated from nature and different from it. Society is understood by the author as an institutional form of the existence of social rea­lity – a self-sufficient human collective capable of producing and reproducing all the necessary conditions for the individual and collective existence of peo­ple, including their formation as social beings. The author views society as a real social group consisting of interconnected people who carry out joint coor­dinated activities aimed at realizing common interests and goals. The point of view is criticized, which denies the ontological reality of society, considering it as an “imaginary community” of people, a product of their project conscious­ness. The author criticizes the approach according to which the interpretation of society as a real group is not applicable to a society divided into classes with multidirectional interests that cause permanent conflicts between their carriers. The author analyzes the phenomenon of self-sufficient existence, which distin­guishes society from non-self-sufficient social groups, distinguishes between actual and potential forms of self-sufficiency, examines its real content associ­ated with the production of subjective, material, informational and organiza­tional elements of social life necessary for its maintenance. The article exam­ines the polemics of representatives of “methodological individualism” and “methodological collectivism” associated with the interpretation of society as an integrative subject with its own needs, interests and goals that are absent from the people who form the society.
社会作为社会现实的制度形式
本文探讨了与理解“社会”范畴有关的争议问题,这对反思社会哲学和理论社会学具有重要意义。作者批评了将社会作为一种社会现实的极其宽泛的解释——一种实质上独立于我们周围世界的子系统,与自然隔绝,与自然不同。社会被作者理解为社会现实存在的制度形式——一个自给自足的人类集体,能够生产和再生产人们个人和集体存在的所有必要条件,包括他们作为社会存在的形成。作者认为社会是一个真实的社会群体,由相互联系的人组成,他们为了实现共同的利益和目标而进行联合协调的活动。这种观点否定了社会的本体论实在性,认为社会是人的“想象共同体”,是人的项目意识的产物。作者批评了将社会解释为一个真实的群体的方法,该方法不适用于社会划分为具有多向利益的阶级,并导致其载体之间的永久冲突。作者分析了自给自足的存在现象,区分了社会与非自给自足的社会群体,区分了自给自足的实际形式和潜在形式,考察了自给自足的真实内容,即与维持自给自足所必需的社会生活的主观、物质、信息和组织要素的生产相联系的内容。本文考察了“方法论个人主义”和“方法论集体主义”代表的争论,他们将社会解释为一个具有自身需求、利益和目标的综合主体,而这些需求、利益和目标是构成社会的人所不具备的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信