Investigating Psychological Differences Between Nurses and Other Health Care Workers From the Asia-Pacific Region During the Early Phase of COVID-19: Machine Learning Approach

JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2021-08-05 DOI:10.2196/32647
Yanhong Dong, Mei Chun Yeo, Xiang Cong Tham, R. Danuaji, T. H. Nguyen, Arvind K Sharma, Komalkumar Rn, Meenakshi Pv, M. S. Tai, Aftab Ahmad, B. Tan, R. Ho, M. C. H. Chua, Vijay K. Sharma
{"title":"Investigating Psychological Differences Between Nurses and Other Health Care Workers From the Asia-Pacific Region During the Early Phase of COVID-19: Machine Learning Approach","authors":"Yanhong Dong, Mei Chun Yeo, Xiang Cong Tham, R. Danuaji, T. H. Nguyen, Arvind K Sharma, Komalkumar Rn, Meenakshi Pv, M. S. Tai, Aftab Ahmad, B. Tan, R. Ho, M. C. H. Chua, Vijay K. Sharma","doi":"10.2196/32647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, challenges in frontline work continue to impose a significant psychological impact on nurses. However, there is a lack of data on how nurses fared compared to other health care workers in the Asia-Pacific region. Objective This study aims to investigate (1) the psychological outcome characteristics of nurses in different Asia-Pacific countries and (2) psychological differences between nurses, doctors, and nonmedical health care workers. Methods Exploratory data analysis and visualization were conducted on the data collected through surveys. A machine learning modeling approach was adopted to further discern the key psychological characteristics differentiating nurses from other health care workers. Decision tree–based machine learning models (Light Gradient Boosting Machine, GradientBoost, and RandomForest) were built to predict whether a set of psychological distress characteristics (ie, depression, anxiety, stress, intrusion, avoidance, and hyperarousal) belong to a nurse. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values were extracted to identify the prominent characteristics of each of these models. The common prominent characteristic among these models is akin to the most distinctive psychological characteristic that differentiates nurses from other health care workers. Results Nurses had relatively higher percentages of having normal or unchanged psychological distress symptoms relative to other health care workers (n=233-260 [86.0%-95.9%] vs n=187-199 [74.8%-91.7%]). Among those without psychological symptoms, nurses constituted a higher proportion than doctors and nonmedical health care workers (n=194 [40.2%], n=142 [29.5%], and n=146 [30.3%], respectively). Nurses in Vietnam showed the highest level of depression, stress, intrusion, avoidance, and hyperarousal symptoms compared to those in Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Nurses in Singapore had the highest level of anxiety. In addition, nurses had the lowest level of stress, which is the most distinctive psychological outcome characteristic derived from machine learning models, compared to other health care workers. Data for India were excluded from the analysis due to the differing psychological response pattern observed in nurses in India. A large number of female nurses emigrating from South India could not have psychologically coped well without the support from family members while living alone in other states. Conclusions Nurses were least psychologically affected compared to doctors and other health care workers. Different contexts, cultures, and points in the pandemic curve may have contributed to differing patterns of psychological outcomes amongst nurses in various Asia-Pacific countries. It is important that all health care workers practice self-care and render peer support to bolster psychological resilience for effective coping. In addition, this study also demonstrated the potential use of decision tree–based machine learning models and SHAP value plots in identifying contributing factors of sophisticated problems in the health care industry.","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/32647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, challenges in frontline work continue to impose a significant psychological impact on nurses. However, there is a lack of data on how nurses fared compared to other health care workers in the Asia-Pacific region. Objective This study aims to investigate (1) the psychological outcome characteristics of nurses in different Asia-Pacific countries and (2) psychological differences between nurses, doctors, and nonmedical health care workers. Methods Exploratory data analysis and visualization were conducted on the data collected through surveys. A machine learning modeling approach was adopted to further discern the key psychological characteristics differentiating nurses from other health care workers. Decision tree–based machine learning models (Light Gradient Boosting Machine, GradientBoost, and RandomForest) were built to predict whether a set of psychological distress characteristics (ie, depression, anxiety, stress, intrusion, avoidance, and hyperarousal) belong to a nurse. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values were extracted to identify the prominent characteristics of each of these models. The common prominent characteristic among these models is akin to the most distinctive psychological characteristic that differentiates nurses from other health care workers. Results Nurses had relatively higher percentages of having normal or unchanged psychological distress symptoms relative to other health care workers (n=233-260 [86.0%-95.9%] vs n=187-199 [74.8%-91.7%]). Among those without psychological symptoms, nurses constituted a higher proportion than doctors and nonmedical health care workers (n=194 [40.2%], n=142 [29.5%], and n=146 [30.3%], respectively). Nurses in Vietnam showed the highest level of depression, stress, intrusion, avoidance, and hyperarousal symptoms compared to those in Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Nurses in Singapore had the highest level of anxiety. In addition, nurses had the lowest level of stress, which is the most distinctive psychological outcome characteristic derived from machine learning models, compared to other health care workers. Data for India were excluded from the analysis due to the differing psychological response pattern observed in nurses in India. A large number of female nurses emigrating from South India could not have psychologically coped well without the support from family members while living alone in other states. Conclusions Nurses were least psychologically affected compared to doctors and other health care workers. Different contexts, cultures, and points in the pandemic curve may have contributed to differing patterns of psychological outcomes amongst nurses in various Asia-Pacific countries. It is important that all health care workers practice self-care and render peer support to bolster psychological resilience for effective coping. In addition, this study also demonstrated the potential use of decision tree–based machine learning models and SHAP value plots in identifying contributing factors of sophisticated problems in the health care industry.
研究2019冠状病毒病早期亚太地区护士和其他医护人员的心理差异:机器学习方法
随着COVID-19大流行的演变,一线工作中的挑战继续对护士产生重大的心理影响。然而,缺乏关于护士与亚太地区其他卫生保健工作者相比如何发展的数据。目的本研究旨在探讨(1)亚太地区不同国家护士的心理结局特征;(2)护士、医生和非医疗卫生工作者的心理差异。方法对调查所得资料进行探索性数据分析和可视化处理。采用机器学习建模方法进一步识别护士与其他卫生保健工作者的关键心理特征。建立了基于决策树的机器学习模型(Light Gradient Boosting machine, GradientBoost和RandomForest)来预测一组心理困扰特征(即抑郁、焦虑、压力、侵扰、回避和过度觉醒)是否属于护士。提取Shapley加性解释(SHAP)值来识别每个模型的突出特征。这些模型中共同的突出特征类似于区分护士与其他卫生保健工作者的最显著的心理特征。结果护士出现正常或未改变心理困扰症状的比例高于其他医护人员(n=233 ~ 260 [86.0% ~ 95.9%] vs n=187 ~ 199[74.8% ~ 91.7%])。在无心理症状的人群中,护士的比例高于医生和非医疗卫生工作者(n=194 [40.2%], n=142 [29.5%], n=146[30.3%])。与新加坡、马来西亚和印度尼西亚的护士相比,越南护士表现出最高水平的抑郁、压力、干扰、回避和过度觉醒症状。新加坡护士的焦虑程度最高。此外,与其他医护人员相比,护士的压力水平最低,这是机器学习模型得出的最显著的心理结果特征。由于在印度护士中观察到的不同心理反应模式,印度的数据被排除在分析之外。大量从南印度移民过来的女护士在其他邦独自生活时,如果没有家人的支持,心理上就无法很好地应对。结论与医生和其他卫生保健工作者相比,护士的心理影响最小。不同的背景、文化和大流行曲线上的不同点可能导致亚太各国护士心理结果的不同模式。重要的是,所有卫生保健工作者都应实行自我保健并提供同伴支持,以增强心理弹性,以便有效应对。此外,本研究还展示了基于决策树的机器学习模型和SHAP值图在确定医疗保健行业复杂问题的促成因素方面的潜在用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信