Comparative Evaluation of Two SD-OCT Macular Parameters (GCC, GCL) and RNFL in Chiasmal Compression

IF 3.1 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eye and Brain Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.2147/EB.S337333
M. Santorini, T. Ferreira de Moura, S. Barraud, C. Litré, C. Brugniart, A. Denoyer, Z. Djerada, C. Arndt
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Two SD-OCT Macular Parameters (GCC, GCL) and RNFL in Chiasmal Compression","authors":"M. Santorini, T. Ferreira de Moura, S. Barraud, C. Litré, C. Brugniart, A. Denoyer, Z. Djerada, C. Arndt","doi":"10.2147/EB.S337333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To evaluate the relationship between different macular thickness parameters analyzed by SD-OCT and the central visual field (VF) evaluated with automated kinetic perimetry in a cohort of patients with pituitary tumors. Methods Data from patients with pituitary adenoma treated at Reims University Hospital between October 1st, 2017, and May 31st, 2018 were collected. All patients underwent an automated kinetic perimetry and a SD-OCT to map the ganglion cell complex (GCC), the ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness and the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) using devices from two different manufacturers. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the correlation between the area of central VF in square degrees (deg2) and the SD-OCT parameters (μm). Results Eighty-eight eyes were included in the analysis. All the thickness parameters measured in SD-OCT decreased with the visual field alteration. The best correlation was observed between superior thickness parameters (GCC, GCL) and the inferior central visual field. The most pertinent predictive factors for visual field loss were the inferior central GCL and the nasal RNFL (both AUC=0.775) with a sensitivity respectively of 86% and 70%. Conclusion This study suggests that both GCC, GCL thickness parameters could be reliable predictors of central visual field impairment in patients with pituitary tumors. There was no significative difference between both devices.","PeriodicalId":51844,"journal":{"name":"Eye and Brain","volume":"14 1","pages":"35 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and Brain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/EB.S337333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the relationship between different macular thickness parameters analyzed by SD-OCT and the central visual field (VF) evaluated with automated kinetic perimetry in a cohort of patients with pituitary tumors. Methods Data from patients with pituitary adenoma treated at Reims University Hospital between October 1st, 2017, and May 31st, 2018 were collected. All patients underwent an automated kinetic perimetry and a SD-OCT to map the ganglion cell complex (GCC), the ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness and the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) using devices from two different manufacturers. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the correlation between the area of central VF in square degrees (deg2) and the SD-OCT parameters (μm). Results Eighty-eight eyes were included in the analysis. All the thickness parameters measured in SD-OCT decreased with the visual field alteration. The best correlation was observed between superior thickness parameters (GCC, GCL) and the inferior central visual field. The most pertinent predictive factors for visual field loss were the inferior central GCL and the nasal RNFL (both AUC=0.775) with a sensitivity respectively of 86% and 70%. Conclusion This study suggests that both GCC, GCL thickness parameters could be reliable predictors of central visual field impairment in patients with pituitary tumors. There was no significative difference between both devices.
SD-OCT两种黄斑参数(GCC, GCL)和RNFL在交叉压迫中的比较评价
目的探讨SD-OCT分析的不同黄斑厚度参数与自动动态视野测量的中心视野(VF)之间的关系。方法收集2017年10月1日至2018年5月31日在兰斯大学医院治疗的垂体腺瘤患者的资料。所有患者都使用两家不同制造商的设备进行了自动动力学视野测量和SD-OCT,以绘制神经节细胞复合物(GCC)、神经节细胞层(GCL)厚度和视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)。采用单因素和多因素分析评价中央VF面积平方度(deg2)与SD-OCT参数(μm)之间的相关性。结果共纳入88只眼。SD-OCT测得的厚度参数均随视野改变而降低。高厚度参数(GCC、GCL)与低中央视野的相关性最好。视野丧失最相关的预测因素为下中央GCL和鼻腔RNFL (AUC均为0.775),敏感性分别为86%和70%。结论GCC、GCL厚度参数均可作为垂体肿瘤患者中央视野损害的可靠预测指标。两种设备之间无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eye and Brain
Eye and Brain OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye and Brain is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on basic research, clinical findings, and expert reviews in the field of visual science and neuro-ophthalmology. The journal’s unique focus is the link between two well-known visual centres, the eye and the brain, with an emphasis on the importance of such connections. All aspects of clinical and especially basic research on the visual system are addressed within the journal as well as significant future directions in vision research and therapeutic measures. This unique journal focuses on neurological aspects of vision – both physiological and pathological. The scope of the journal spans from the cornea to the associational visual cortex and all the visual centers in between. Topics range from basic biological mechanisms to therapeutic treatment, from simple organisms to humans, and utilizing techniques from molecular biology to behavior. The journal especially welcomes primary research articles or review papers that make the connection between the eye and the brain. Specific areas covered in the journal include: Physiology and pathophysiology of visual centers, Eye movement disorders and strabismus, Cellular, biochemical, and molecular features of the visual system, Structural and functional organization of the eye and of the visual cortex, Metabolic demands of the visual system, Diseases and disorders with neuro-ophthalmic manifestations, Clinical and experimental neuro-ophthalmology and visual system pathologies, Epidemiological studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信