{"title":"Analysis of G. Gubaydullin’s articles published in the “Maktap” magazine in 1913","authors":"Dilyara M. Galiullina","doi":"10.22378/he.2022-7-3.482-491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the articles of the famous Tatar historian G. Gubaydullin published in his student years in the magazine “Maktap” (1913). The articles are devoted to the problems of teaching logic and history in Tatar madrasas at the beginning of the twentieth century. The introduction of new secular subjects into the learning process was especially relevant for the national school. Moreover, new teaching methods were developed in the absence of school textbooks in the Tatar language. Gubaydullin, as a future professional historian, understood full well the importance of humanitarian subjects, especially history and logic, in the formation of national identity of young people. In the article “Din madrasalarenda tarikh ukytu” (“Teaching history in religious madrassas”) he discusses the methodological recommendations for teachers and shakirds. The recommendations were important because Tatar educators had no experience in teaching history. Logic was studied in old-fashioned madrasas, but after the 1905 revolution the training programs were changed and there was a demand for a new textbook which would meet the requirements of the era. The historian writes about this issue in the article “Din madrasalarenda mantyk” (“Logic in religious madrassas”). At the beginning of the new century, the Tatar public had heated discussions about the concept of “nation”. G. Gubaydullin expressed his opinion about the preservation of the unity of the Turkic peoples in the article “Iske tel ham millat” (“Old language and nation”). He considered it necessary to introduce a new school subject – the Chagatay language for a better understanding of the ancient Turkic literature. The analysis of these articles gives an idea of the scholar’s views on national pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":34778,"journal":{"name":"Istoricheskaia etnologiia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istoricheskaia etnologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2022-7-3.482-491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper analyses the articles of the famous Tatar historian G. Gubaydullin published in his student years in the magazine “Maktap” (1913). The articles are devoted to the problems of teaching logic and history in Tatar madrasas at the beginning of the twentieth century. The introduction of new secular subjects into the learning process was especially relevant for the national school. Moreover, new teaching methods were developed in the absence of school textbooks in the Tatar language. Gubaydullin, as a future professional historian, understood full well the importance of humanitarian subjects, especially history and logic, in the formation of national identity of young people. In the article “Din madrasalarenda tarikh ukytu” (“Teaching history in religious madrassas”) he discusses the methodological recommendations for teachers and shakirds. The recommendations were important because Tatar educators had no experience in teaching history. Logic was studied in old-fashioned madrasas, but after the 1905 revolution the training programs were changed and there was a demand for a new textbook which would meet the requirements of the era. The historian writes about this issue in the article “Din madrasalarenda mantyk” (“Logic in religious madrassas”). At the beginning of the new century, the Tatar public had heated discussions about the concept of “nation”. G. Gubaydullin expressed his opinion about the preservation of the unity of the Turkic peoples in the article “Iske tel ham millat” (“Old language and nation”). He considered it necessary to introduce a new school subject – the Chagatay language for a better understanding of the ancient Turkic literature. The analysis of these articles gives an idea of the scholar’s views on national pedagogy.
本文分析了鞑靼著名历史学家古巴耶杜林在学生时代发表在《Maktap》杂志(1913)上的文章。这些文章致力于探讨20世纪初鞑靼宗教学校的逻辑和历史教学问题。在学习过程中引入新的世俗科目对国立学校尤为重要。此外,在没有鞑靼语教科书的情况下,开发了新的教学方法。古巴耶杜林,作为未来的职业历史学家,充分理解人文学科的重要性,特别是历史和逻辑,在形成年轻人的民族认同。在“宗教学校的历史教学”一文中,他讨论了对教师和教师的方法论建议。这些建议很重要,因为鞑靼教育工作者没有教历史的经验。逻辑是在老式的伊斯兰学校里学习的,但在1905年革命之后,培训计划发生了变化,人们需要一种符合时代要求的新教科书。历史学家在“宗教学校的逻辑”一文中提到了这个问题。在新世纪之初,鞑靼民众对“民族”的概念进行了热烈的讨论。G. Gubaydullin在“Iske tel ham millat”(“古老的语言和民族”)一文中表达了他对维护突厥民族统一的看法。他认为有必要引入一门新的学科——察合台语,以便更好地了解古代突厥文学。通过对这些文章的分析,可以看出这位学者对民族教育学的看法。