Scenning electron microscopy (SEM) assessment of tubular penetration depth of root canal sealers combined with different obturation techniques

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Premovic Cvjeticanin, B. Ramić, Karolina Vukoje, M. Drobac, I. Stojanac, L. Petrovic
{"title":"Scenning electron microscopy (SEM) assessment of tubular penetration depth of root canal sealers combined with different obturation techniques","authors":"Premovic Cvjeticanin, B. Ramić, Karolina Vukoje, M. Drobac, I. Stojanac, L. Petrovic","doi":"10.2298/vsp221017028c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim. The ability to effectively and consistently penetrate into dentinal tubules is considered as a favorable factor of root canal sealers RCS). The aim of the study was to assess the penetration depth into dentinal tubules of three RCS combined with four obturation techniques. Methods. Mesial canals of 66 extracted human mandibular molars were endodontically prepared and randomly allocated into 12 experimental groups depending on the sealer type used (AH Plus, EndoREZ, Sealapex) and the obturation technique applied (Cold Lateral compaction, Cone-Fit, Carrier-based, Warm Vertical compaction). Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transversal root cross-sections were analyzed and the maximum depth of sealer penetration was measured (396 sections in total corresponded to the apical, middle and coronary third). Results. Group AH Plus/Warm Vertical compaction yielded the highest penetration depth - 1,165 ?m, followed by EndoREZ/Cone-Fit - 1,154 ?m; the lowest depth was measured for EndoREZ/Warm Vertical compaction - 502 ?m. The maximum penetration depth of sealers in the coronary thirds (common mean value) yielded 1,204 ?m, in the middle thirds - 1,005 ?m and in the apical thirds - 770 ?m. AH plus penetrated deeper into dentinal tubules when the obturation techniques with heated gutta-percha were applied, while the opposite findings were obtained for EndoREZ. Conclusion. The sealer penetration depth appears to be influenced by the sealer type used, as well as the obturation technique applied.","PeriodicalId":23531,"journal":{"name":"Vojnosanitetski pregled","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vojnosanitetski pregled","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/vsp221017028c","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim. The ability to effectively and consistently penetrate into dentinal tubules is considered as a favorable factor of root canal sealers RCS). The aim of the study was to assess the penetration depth into dentinal tubules of three RCS combined with four obturation techniques. Methods. Mesial canals of 66 extracted human mandibular molars were endodontically prepared and randomly allocated into 12 experimental groups depending on the sealer type used (AH Plus, EndoREZ, Sealapex) and the obturation technique applied (Cold Lateral compaction, Cone-Fit, Carrier-based, Warm Vertical compaction). Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transversal root cross-sections were analyzed and the maximum depth of sealer penetration was measured (396 sections in total corresponded to the apical, middle and coronary third). Results. Group AH Plus/Warm Vertical compaction yielded the highest penetration depth - 1,165 ?m, followed by EndoREZ/Cone-Fit - 1,154 ?m; the lowest depth was measured for EndoREZ/Warm Vertical compaction - 502 ?m. The maximum penetration depth of sealers in the coronary thirds (common mean value) yielded 1,204 ?m, in the middle thirds - 1,005 ?m and in the apical thirds - 770 ?m. AH plus penetrated deeper into dentinal tubules when the obturation techniques with heated gutta-percha were applied, while the opposite findings were obtained for EndoREZ. Conclusion. The sealer penetration depth appears to be influenced by the sealer type used, as well as the obturation technique applied.
扫描电镜(SEM)评估不同封闭技术的根管封闭器的管状渗透深度
背景/目的。有效和持续渗透到牙本质小管的能力被认为是根管密封器的有利因素。本研究的目的是评估三种RCS联合四种封闭技术对牙本质小管的渗透深度。方法。将66颗拔除的人下颌磨牙近中牙管进行根管预备,并根据使用的封闭剂类型(AH Plus、EndoREZ、Sealapex)和采用的封闭技术(冷侧压实、Cone-Fit、载体型、温垂直压实)随机分为12个实验组。利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析了横根断面,并测量了封口剂的最大穿透深度(总共396个断面对应于根尖、中、冠状三分之一)。结果。AH Plus/Warm组垂直压实的钻进深度最高,为1165 μ m,其次是EndoREZ/Cone-Fit,为1154 μ m;EndoREZ/Warm垂直压实的最低深度为502 ?m。冠状动脉三分之一处封口剂的最大穿透深度为1204 μ m,中间三分之一处为1005 μ m,根尖三分之一处为770 μ m。当使用加热杜胶封闭技术时,AH +深入到牙本质小管中,而EndoREZ则相反。结论。封口剂的渗透深度似乎受到所使用的封口剂类型以及所采用的封闭技术的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vojnosanitetski pregled
Vojnosanitetski pregled MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vojnosanitetski pregled (VSP) is a leading medical journal of physicians and pharmacists of the Serbian Army. The Journal is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信