THE COMPARISON BETWEEN DEFICIT FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGIST WITH VON WILLEBRAND FACTOR LEVELS IN ACUTE THROMBOTIC STROKE PATIENTS

Ita Muharram Sari, M. Islam
{"title":"THE COMPARISON BETWEEN DEFICIT FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGIST WITH VON WILLEBRAND FACTOR LEVELS IN ACUTE THROMBOTIC STROKE PATIENTS","authors":"Ita Muharram Sari, M. Islam","doi":"10.21776/UB.MNJ.2016.002.01.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. There are limited studies of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and thrombotic stroke, escpecially the relationship between level of vWF and functional neurological deficit. Objective. To determine the difference between functional neurological deficit; measured by the NIHSS scale with the vWF level. Methods. Design study was cross sectional, sampling by consecutive admission according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Blood samples were taken for vWF measurement. Patients are divided into two categories, low vWF level and high vWF levels. Deficit functional neurologist was measured by NIHSS scale. Results. The results were analyzed by chi square. From 80 patients, the result compares the level of NIHSS scale. In grup with mild NIHSS and low vWF levels (50 %) higher than grup with mild NIHSS and high vWF levels (27,27 %). In other side, grup with moderate NIHSS and low vWF levels (50 %) lower than grup with moderate NIHSS and high vWF levels (72,73 %). The difference is not significant statistically (p=0.067). Conclusion. There was no difference between deficit functional neurologist measured by NIHSS scale with von Willebrand factor levels in acute thrombotic stroke patients.","PeriodicalId":31552,"journal":{"name":"Malang Neurology Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malang Neurology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/UB.MNJ.2016.002.01.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. There are limited studies of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and thrombotic stroke, escpecially the relationship between level of vWF and functional neurological deficit. Objective. To determine the difference between functional neurological deficit; measured by the NIHSS scale with the vWF level. Methods. Design study was cross sectional, sampling by consecutive admission according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Blood samples were taken for vWF measurement. Patients are divided into two categories, low vWF level and high vWF levels. Deficit functional neurologist was measured by NIHSS scale. Results. The results were analyzed by chi square. From 80 patients, the result compares the level of NIHSS scale. In grup with mild NIHSS and low vWF levels (50 %) higher than grup with mild NIHSS and high vWF levels (27,27 %). In other side, grup with moderate NIHSS and low vWF levels (50 %) lower than grup with moderate NIHSS and high vWF levels (72,73 %). The difference is not significant statistically (p=0.067). Conclusion. There was no difference between deficit functional neurologist measured by NIHSS scale with von Willebrand factor levels in acute thrombotic stroke patients.
急性血栓性脑卒中患者神经功能缺损与血管性血友病因子水平的比较
背景。血管性血友病因子(vWF)与血栓性卒中的关系研究有限,特别是vWF水平与功能性神经功能缺损的关系研究较少。目标。确定功能性神经缺损的区别;用NIHSS量表测量vWF水平。方法。设计研究是横断面的,根据纳入和排除标准连续入组抽样。采集血样进行vWF测量。患者分为低vWF水平和高vWF水平两类。神经功能缺损采用NIHSS量表进行测量。结果。结果用卡方分析。对80例患者的NIHSS量表水平进行比较。轻度NIHSS和低vWF水平组(50%)高于轻度NIHSS和高vWF水平组(27.7%)。另一方面,中度NIHSS低vWF组(50%)低于中度NIHSS高vWF组(72,73 %)。差异无统计学意义(p=0.067)。结论。在急性血栓性脑卒中患者中,NIHSS量表测量的神经功能缺损与血管性血友病因子水平无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信