ANALYSIS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION ON REGIONAL DISPARITY (CASE STUDY OF PROVINCES IN EASTERN AND WESTERN OF INDONESIA, 2006-2015)
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION ON REGIONAL DISPARITY (CASE STUDY OF PROVINCES IN EASTERN AND WESTERN OF INDONESIA, 2006-2015)","authors":"F. Fadli","doi":"10.21776/.jiae.2016.006.02.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the direct and indirect effects of fiscal decentralization on regional disparity through economic growth in eastern and western Indonesia. The method used in this study is Path Analysis. The variables used in this study include the General Allocation Fund (DAU/Dana Alokasi Umum), Special Allocation Fund (DAK/Dana Alokasi Khusus), Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH/Dana Bagi Hasil), local revenue (PAD/Pendapatan Asli Daerah), Economic Growth (G), and regional disparity (IW). Comparing the analysis between eastern and western of Indonesia, the results show that there is no direct effect of fiscal decentralization on regional disparity and economic growth through direct fiscal decentralization on regional disparity in both eastern and western of Indonesia. However, using some measures of fiscal decentralization, in the case of eastern of Indonesia, DAU variable has significant effect whereas in the case of western Indonesia, DBH is the only one variable that has significant effect. This is consistent with the fact that composition of the balance funds disbursed by the central government to local governments, where the greatest composition of funds in eastern Indonesia come from the General Allocation Fund which reflects the dependence of local governments to the central government and for the western region of Indonesia, DBH is the greatest reflecting the independence of the local governments. As a result, to create fiscal decentralization working it is required a greater allocation of the fund balance.","PeriodicalId":31557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics","volume":"6 1","pages":"208-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/.jiae.2016.006.02.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the direct and indirect effects of fiscal decentralization on regional disparity through economic growth in eastern and western Indonesia. The method used in this study is Path Analysis. The variables used in this study include the General Allocation Fund (DAU/Dana Alokasi Umum), Special Allocation Fund (DAK/Dana Alokasi Khusus), Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH/Dana Bagi Hasil), local revenue (PAD/Pendapatan Asli Daerah), Economic Growth (G), and regional disparity (IW). Comparing the analysis between eastern and western of Indonesia, the results show that there is no direct effect of fiscal decentralization on regional disparity and economic growth through direct fiscal decentralization on regional disparity in both eastern and western of Indonesia. However, using some measures of fiscal decentralization, in the case of eastern of Indonesia, DAU variable has significant effect whereas in the case of western Indonesia, DBH is the only one variable that has significant effect. This is consistent with the fact that composition of the balance funds disbursed by the central government to local governments, where the greatest composition of funds in eastern Indonesia come from the General Allocation Fund which reflects the dependence of local governments to the central government and for the western region of Indonesia, DBH is the greatest reflecting the independence of the local governments. As a result, to create fiscal decentralization working it is required a greater allocation of the fund balance.
本研究旨在探讨财政分权通过印尼东部和西部的经济增长对区域差异的直接和间接影响。本研究采用通径分析法。本研究使用的变量包括一般分配基金(DAU/Dana Alokasi Umum)、特别分配基金(DAK/Dana Alokasi Khusus)、收入分享基金(DBH/Dana Bagi Hasil)、地方收入(PAD/Pendapatan Asli Daerah)、经济增长(G)和地区差距(IW)。通过对印尼东部和西部的对比分析,结果表明财政分权对地区差异和经济增长没有直接影响,通过直接财政分权对印尼东部和西部的地区差异都没有直接影响。然而,使用财政分权的一些措施,在印度尼西亚东部的情况下,DAU变量有显著影响,而在印度尼西亚西部的情况下,DBH是唯一一个具有显著影响的变量。这与中央政府向地方政府支付的结余资金的构成是一致的,其中印尼东部地区的资金构成最大的来自于总拨款基金,反映了地方政府对中央政府的依赖性,而印尼西部地区的DBH最大的反映了地方政府的独立性。因此,要使财政权力下放发挥作用,就需要分配更多的基金余额。