Dominância de membros tomadores ou poupadores de recursos nas cooperativas de crédito e o desempenho: análise sob a ótica da teoria de agência

IF 0.1 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Mário Nazzari Westrup, S. P. O. Camilo, Dimas de Oliveira Estevam
{"title":"Dominância de membros tomadores ou poupadores de recursos nas cooperativas de crédito e o desempenho: análise sob a ótica da teoria de agência","authors":"Mário Nazzari Westrup, S. P. O. Camilo, Dimas de Oliveira Estevam","doi":"10.22279/NAVUS.2018.V8N2.P27-42.602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Possible conflicts of interest in credit cooperatives have instigated research, given the proliferation of this model of association in Brazil and the rest of the world, seeking to understand characteristics of influential groups and the impacts on performance. The overall objective of this research was to analyze the extent to which dominance - understood as the decision-making power of borrowers or resource savers - affects the performance of credit cooperatives. This study integrates problems of agency between principal-principal and conceptions of cooperativism. The centrality of the discussions lies in the potential conflict between borrowers and credit savers and their effect on performance. From the literature review, two hypotheses have been proposed in order to evaluate the relationship between domination and performance. As research strategy was carried out data collection of cooperatives affiliated to the Cooperative Credit System SICREDI. In order to reach the objective of the research, multivariate data analysis was used as a technique with the use of panel data from 39 cooperatives affiliated to SICREDI, from 2008 to 2014. The data indicated that the dominance index is an influential factor and statistically significant return on assets (ROA). Another relevant contribution was the identification of domination by borrowers and the absence of neutral cooperatives, which may violate the real function of credit cooperatives, their sustainability and their commitment to the guiding principles of cooperativism, thus moving away from their assumptions, culminating in practices contradictory to his discourse.","PeriodicalId":41767,"journal":{"name":"Navus-Revista de Gestao e Tecnologia","volume":"55 1","pages":"27-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Navus-Revista de Gestao e Tecnologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22279/NAVUS.2018.V8N2.P27-42.602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Possible conflicts of interest in credit cooperatives have instigated research, given the proliferation of this model of association in Brazil and the rest of the world, seeking to understand characteristics of influential groups and the impacts on performance. The overall objective of this research was to analyze the extent to which dominance - understood as the decision-making power of borrowers or resource savers - affects the performance of credit cooperatives. This study integrates problems of agency between principal-principal and conceptions of cooperativism. The centrality of the discussions lies in the potential conflict between borrowers and credit savers and their effect on performance. From the literature review, two hypotheses have been proposed in order to evaluate the relationship between domination and performance. As research strategy was carried out data collection of cooperatives affiliated to the Cooperative Credit System SICREDI. In order to reach the objective of the research, multivariate data analysis was used as a technique with the use of panel data from 39 cooperatives affiliated to SICREDI, from 2008 to 2014. The data indicated that the dominance index is an influential factor and statistically significant return on assets (ROA). Another relevant contribution was the identification of domination by borrowers and the absence of neutral cooperatives, which may violate the real function of credit cooperatives, their sustainability and their commitment to the guiding principles of cooperativism, thus moving away from their assumptions, culminating in practices contradictory to his discourse.
信用合作社中借款者或储蓄者的主导地位与绩效:代理理论视角下的分析
鉴于信用合作社这种联合模式在巴西和世界其他地区的扩散,可能存在的利益冲突促使人们进行研究,力求了解有影响力群体的特点及其对业绩的影响。这项研究的总体目标是分析支配地位- -被理解为借款人或资源节约者的决策权- -对信用合作社业绩的影响程度。本研究整合了委托人与委托人之间的代理问题和合作主义的概念。讨论的核心在于借款人和信贷储蓄者之间的潜在冲突及其对业绩的影响。从文献综述来看,为了评估支配与绩效之间的关系,提出了两个假设。随着研究战略的实施,合作社信贷系统SICREDI下属合作社的数据收集。为了达到研究目的,本研究采用多元数据分析的方法,利用2008 - 2014年江西农协下属39家合作社的面板数据。数据表明,优势指数是影响资产收益率的重要因素,且具有统计学意义。另一个有关的贡献是确定了借贷者的支配地位和没有中立的合作社,这可能违反信用合作社的真正功能、它们的可持续性和它们对合作主义指导原则的承诺,从而偏离了它们的假设,最终导致与他的论述相矛盾的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信