Animal welfare assessment in Slovenian conventional and alternative pig production systems

Q3 Veterinary
Irena Golinar-Oven, J. Plut, M. Stukelj
{"title":"Animal welfare assessment in Slovenian conventional and alternative pig production systems","authors":"Irena Golinar-Oven, J. Plut, M. Stukelj","doi":"10.2298/vetgl210930016g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of the study were to assess the welfare of pigs in Slovenian farms based on the international Welfare Quality? Assessment protocol for pigs and to gain a first insight into the welfare of pigs in Slovenian conventional and alternative farms. Pig welfare in Slovenia was assessed using the Welfare Quality? protocol on 10 alternative and 10 conventional farms. The size of the farm ranged from 11 to 1900 breeding sows in conventional farms and from three to 50 breeding sows in alternative farms. Using the protocol, the welfare of breeding sows, suckling piglets, growers, and fattening pigs was evaluated. The protocol consisted of four main principles of animal welfare (good feeding, good housing, good health, and appropriate behaviour), which were subdivided into 12 independent criteria. To evaluate each of these criteria, a set of measures was used. Overall animal welfare quality was calculated with a mathematical model incorporated into the protocol. Depending on the scores of the four principles, farms were classified as excellent, enhanced, acceptable or not classified. According to the Welfare Quality? protocol and statistical calculation, growers and fatteners in Slovenian conventional farms were rated as acceptable, while Slovenian alternative farms were rated as enhanced. We can conclude that the welfare of the growers and fatteners in our alternative farms is at a higher level than in conventional farms. The most critical evaluation points in sows were bursitis, wounds on the body, stereotypies, and fear of humans.","PeriodicalId":30435,"journal":{"name":"Veterinarski Glasnik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinarski Glasnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/vetgl210930016g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aims of the study were to assess the welfare of pigs in Slovenian farms based on the international Welfare Quality? Assessment protocol for pigs and to gain a first insight into the welfare of pigs in Slovenian conventional and alternative farms. Pig welfare in Slovenia was assessed using the Welfare Quality? protocol on 10 alternative and 10 conventional farms. The size of the farm ranged from 11 to 1900 breeding sows in conventional farms and from three to 50 breeding sows in alternative farms. Using the protocol, the welfare of breeding sows, suckling piglets, growers, and fattening pigs was evaluated. The protocol consisted of four main principles of animal welfare (good feeding, good housing, good health, and appropriate behaviour), which were subdivided into 12 independent criteria. To evaluate each of these criteria, a set of measures was used. Overall animal welfare quality was calculated with a mathematical model incorporated into the protocol. Depending on the scores of the four principles, farms were classified as excellent, enhanced, acceptable or not classified. According to the Welfare Quality? protocol and statistical calculation, growers and fatteners in Slovenian conventional farms were rated as acceptable, while Slovenian alternative farms were rated as enhanced. We can conclude that the welfare of the growers and fatteners in our alternative farms is at a higher level than in conventional farms. The most critical evaluation points in sows were bursitis, wounds on the body, stereotypies, and fear of humans.
斯洛文尼亚传统和替代生猪生产系统的动物福利评估
本研究的目的是根据国际福利质量标准评估斯洛文尼亚农场猪的福利。猪的评估协议,并获得对斯洛文尼亚传统和替代农场猪的福利的第一个见解。斯洛文尼亚的猪福利使用福利质量?10个替代农场和10个传统农场的协议。养殖场的规模在传统养殖场为11 ~ 1900头母猪,在替代养殖场为3 ~ 50头母猪。利用该方案,对种猪、哺乳仔猪、种植者和育肥猪的福利进行了评估。该议定书包括动物福利的四项主要原则(良好的喂养、良好的住房、良好的健康和适当的行为),这些原则又被细分为12个独立的标准。为了评估这些标准,使用了一组测量方法。总体动物福利质量通过纳入方案的数学模型进行计算。根据这四项原则的得分,农场被分为优秀、增强、可接受和未分类。根据福利质量?协议和统计计算,斯洛文尼亚传统农场的种植者和育肥者被评为可接受,而斯洛文尼亚替代农场被评为增强。我们可以得出结论,我们的替代农场的种植者和育肥者的福利水平高于传统农场。母猪最关键的评价点是滑囊炎、身体伤口、刻板印象和对人的恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinarski Glasnik
Veterinarski Glasnik Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信