Assessing waste management efficiency in the European Union: A focus on the Slovak Republic

Q4 Environmental Science
Marina Valenćiková, P. Fandel
{"title":"Assessing waste management efficiency in the European Union: A focus on the Slovak Republic","authors":"Marina Valenćiková, P. Fandel","doi":"10.19040/ecocycles.v9i2.285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though every country in the EU must follow the waste management hierarchy stipulated in Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, there are differences in how the member states manage their municipal waste. For example, the percentage of recyclable and incineration with energy recovery of municipal waste is among the lowest in the Slovak Republic (and the high amount of its disposal by landfilling). However, following the European Union legislation, several strategies in the Slovak Republic, such as the Waste Prevention Program 2019-2025, Waste Management Program 2021-2025, and Envirostrategy 2030, have been adopted. Based on these strategies, the recycling rate is scheduled to increase to 65% by 2035, and the percentage of municipal waste sent to landfills is planned to fall below 25%. These projections assume the successful implementation of the programs. As a result, the Slovak Republic’s waste is significantly lower than that of other member states. When investigating the efficiency of municipal waste management, we utilised partial treatment-specific indicators and a composite indicator based on an approach known as the multi-criteria decision-making method. The highest efficiency of municipal waste management in the EU-27 in 2021, expressed by the composite indicator, was achieved by Germany (0.630), and the lowest performance by Malta (0.188). For the evaluated period of 2017–2021, municipal waste management efficiency improved the most in Malta (+28.4%) and deteriorated the most in Denmark (-20.8%). The broader implications of our research have shown significant differences in partial treatment-specific indicators across the EU-27.","PeriodicalId":31709,"journal":{"name":"Ecocycles","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecocycles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19040/ecocycles.v9i2.285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Even though every country in the EU must follow the waste management hierarchy stipulated in Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, there are differences in how the member states manage their municipal waste. For example, the percentage of recyclable and incineration with energy recovery of municipal waste is among the lowest in the Slovak Republic (and the high amount of its disposal by landfilling). However, following the European Union legislation, several strategies in the Slovak Republic, such as the Waste Prevention Program 2019-2025, Waste Management Program 2021-2025, and Envirostrategy 2030, have been adopted. Based on these strategies, the recycling rate is scheduled to increase to 65% by 2035, and the percentage of municipal waste sent to landfills is planned to fall below 25%. These projections assume the successful implementation of the programs. As a result, the Slovak Republic’s waste is significantly lower than that of other member states. When investigating the efficiency of municipal waste management, we utilised partial treatment-specific indicators and a composite indicator based on an approach known as the multi-criteria decision-making method. The highest efficiency of municipal waste management in the EU-27 in 2021, expressed by the composite indicator, was achieved by Germany (0.630), and the lowest performance by Malta (0.188). For the evaluated period of 2017–2021, municipal waste management efficiency improved the most in Malta (+28.4%) and deteriorated the most in Denmark (-20.8%). The broader implications of our research have shown significant differences in partial treatment-specific indicators across the EU-27.
评估欧洲联盟废物管理效率:以斯洛伐克共和国为重点
尽管欧盟的每个国家都必须遵守欧洲议会和理事会2018年5月30日修订关于废物的指令2008/98/EC的指令(EU) 2018/851中规定的废物管理等级制度,但成员国在如何管理城市废物方面存在差异。例如,在斯洛伐克共和国,城市废物的可循环利用和焚烧并回收能源的比例是最低的(通过填埋处理的比例很高)。然而,根据欧盟立法,斯洛伐克共和国通过了若干战略,如2019-2025年废物预防计划、2021-2025年废物管理计划和2030年环境战略。根据这些战略,到2035年,回收率计划提高到65%,城市垃圾填埋率计划降至25%以下。这些预测是在这些计划成功实施的前提下作出的。因此,斯洛伐克共和国的废物大大低于其他成员国。在调查城市废物管理效率时,我们使用了部分特定处理指标和基于多标准决策方法的复合指标。综合指标表示,2021年欧盟27国城市垃圾管理效率最高的是德国(0.630),最低的是马耳他(0.188)。在2017-2021年的评估期内,马耳他的城市垃圾管理效率提高最多(+28.4%),丹麦的城市垃圾管理效率下降最多(-20.8%)。我们的研究更广泛的意义表明,欧盟27国在部分治疗特异性指标上存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecocycles
Ecocycles Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信