Attempts for undoing the ecological incompatibility of agricultural technologies: from ecological pest management to agroecology

Q4 Environmental Science
A. Székács, B. Darvas
{"title":"Attempts for undoing the ecological incompatibility of agricultural technologies: from ecological pest management to agroecology","authors":"A. Székács, B. Darvas","doi":"10.19040/ecocycles.v8i2.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current agroecology is often categorized into three facets, science, practice, and movement. While the latter two aspects currently play significant and varying roles in different regions of the world, the fundamental aspect is the first one, the scientific approach that subsequently provided the possibility of the birth of the other two. The concept of integrated plant protection i.e., the emphasis on ecological considerations in chemical pest control emerged as a revolutionary novel concept in the middle of the last century. Among the priority principles, there are several similarities between ecological plant protection suggested by the pioneering Hungarian researcher Barnabás Nagy in 1957 and integrated pest management (IPM) initiated by US scientists Stern et al. in 1959, in given aspects such as the use of natural enemies, forecasting, and environmentally friendly strategies. In turn, the principles of ecological plant protection and IPM overlap on numerous points, but differences are also apparent. Neither of these strategies, however, emphases with due vigor the significance of persistence, pesticide residues, and chronic health-damaging effects. By today, properly assessing the environmental fate, behavior and chronic side effects of pesticides have become as important as taking the rapidly changing composition of local communities into consideration by the above three aspects of agroecology. The current pesticide re-registration strategy of the European Union focuses on prolonged changes from chronic effects. Ecological plant protection and IPM set preferences of sustainability e.g., the use of mechanical or biological protection methods and lowering the rate of agrochemical protection, but they have failed to establish transparent sustainability requirements that are easy to comprehend by general consumers. In contrast, ecological (organic) agriculture managed to formulate such clear regulations (a complete ban on synthetic pesticides), which is well-reflected in their rising preference by consumers but failed to prove that observed health benefits of organic produce is indeed due to the lack of the residues of those pesticides banned. In turn, the ecological approach currently has a strong presence in the form of the determined agroecological objectives of the European Green Deal. In retrospect, it is particularly impressive to observe the path of IPM, sustainable agriculture and all three aspects agroecology all rooted in the establishment of the ecological initiatives in the late fifties as their common historical scientific starting point.","PeriodicalId":31709,"journal":{"name":"Ecocycles","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecocycles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19040/ecocycles.v8i2.222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Current agroecology is often categorized into three facets, science, practice, and movement. While the latter two aspects currently play significant and varying roles in different regions of the world, the fundamental aspect is the first one, the scientific approach that subsequently provided the possibility of the birth of the other two. The concept of integrated plant protection i.e., the emphasis on ecological considerations in chemical pest control emerged as a revolutionary novel concept in the middle of the last century. Among the priority principles, there are several similarities between ecological plant protection suggested by the pioneering Hungarian researcher Barnabás Nagy in 1957 and integrated pest management (IPM) initiated by US scientists Stern et al. in 1959, in given aspects such as the use of natural enemies, forecasting, and environmentally friendly strategies. In turn, the principles of ecological plant protection and IPM overlap on numerous points, but differences are also apparent. Neither of these strategies, however, emphases with due vigor the significance of persistence, pesticide residues, and chronic health-damaging effects. By today, properly assessing the environmental fate, behavior and chronic side effects of pesticides have become as important as taking the rapidly changing composition of local communities into consideration by the above three aspects of agroecology. The current pesticide re-registration strategy of the European Union focuses on prolonged changes from chronic effects. Ecological plant protection and IPM set preferences of sustainability e.g., the use of mechanical or biological protection methods and lowering the rate of agrochemical protection, but they have failed to establish transparent sustainability requirements that are easy to comprehend by general consumers. In contrast, ecological (organic) agriculture managed to formulate such clear regulations (a complete ban on synthetic pesticides), which is well-reflected in their rising preference by consumers but failed to prove that observed health benefits of organic produce is indeed due to the lack of the residues of those pesticides banned. In turn, the ecological approach currently has a strong presence in the form of the determined agroecological objectives of the European Green Deal. In retrospect, it is particularly impressive to observe the path of IPM, sustainable agriculture and all three aspects agroecology all rooted in the establishment of the ecological initiatives in the late fifties as their common historical scientific starting point.
消除农业技术生态不相容的尝试:从有害生物生态治理到农业生态学
当前的农业生态学通常分为三个方面:科学、实践和运动。虽然后两个方面目前在世界不同地区发挥着重要和不同的作用,但最基本的方面是第一个方面,即随后为其他两个方面的诞生提供可能性的科学方法。综合植物保护的概念,即强调化学害虫防治中的生态考虑,是上个世纪中叶出现的一个革命性的新概念。在优先原则中,匈牙利开创性研究员Barnabás Nagy于1957年提出的生态植物保护与美国科学家Stern等人于1959年提出的害虫综合治理(IPM)在使用天敌、预测和环境友好策略等特定方面有一些相似之处。反过来,生态植物保护和IPM的原则在许多方面重叠,但差异也很明显。然而,这两种策略都没有充分强调持久性、农药残留和慢性健康损害效应的重要性。时至今日,正确评估农药的环境命运、行为和慢性副作用,已变得与通过农业生态学的上述三个方面考虑当地社区迅速变化的组成一样重要。欧盟目前的农药重新登记战略侧重于长期影响的长期变化。生态植物保护和IPM设定了可持续性的偏好,例如,使用机械或生物保护方法和降低农用化学品保护率,但它们未能建立透明的可持续性要求,使一般消费者易于理解。相比之下,生态(有机)农业制定了如此明确的规定(完全禁止使用合成农药),这充分反映在消费者对其的偏好上升上,但未能证明观察到的有机农产品的健康益处确实是因为没有禁用农药的残留。反过来,生态方法目前在欧洲绿色协议确定的农业生态目标中占有重要地位。回顾过去,尤其令人印象深刻的是,IPM、可持续农业和农业生态学这三个方面的路径都植根于50年代末建立的生态倡议,作为它们共同的历史科学起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecocycles
Ecocycles Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信