Effects of different feed components and the treatment of the litter on the ammonia emission of equine urine

Q4 Environmental Science
Á. Bartos, I. Koltay, Zsófia Ujj, A. Bányai, Nikoletta Such, Zsuzsanna Restás
{"title":"Effects of different feed components and the treatment of the litter on the ammonia emission of equine urine","authors":"Á. Bartos, I. Koltay, Zsófia Ujj, A. Bányai, Nikoletta Such, Zsuzsanna Restás","doi":"10.19040/ecocycles.v7i2.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main goal of our research was to study the effects of different feed components and the treatment of the litter on the NH3 emission of equine urine. Four adult horses were used in the experiment. The basic diet consisted of 1500 g mashed oat, fed twice a day (morning and evening), and ad libitum hay. During the night the horses were kept separately in concrete floor boxes, the litter was wheat straw. The whole study was divided into 3 main periods. In the first period of the experiment the litter and the floor were treated with a probiotic supplement for two days in the evenings. In the second period of the experiment for 8 days the basic diet was supplemented with 40 ml of probiotic added to the oat. Before the third period of our study the horses were fed with their regular diet for two weeks. After that the oat was changed to a high-protein-value horse feed for 12 days. At the end of the second and third periods, the litter was treated again. Urine contaminated straw samples were collected after each period before and after the litter treatments from different places of the litter in the morning before the daily littering. From the samples, the dry matter content and the NH3 emission were measured. Statistical analysis was carried out with linear modelling. According to our results, both the probiotic treatment of the feed and the high-protein-value horse feed decreased the urine NH3 emission significantly (p<0.05). However, the NH3 emission was only slightly influenced by the litter treatment. Only in the case of probiotic feed supplement could a decrease in emission be detected, but the result was not significant. There was no difference in the dry matter content of the samples. Based on our results, we can conclude that both the high-protein-value horse feed and the probiotic supplement applied in our experiment can be useful to decrease urine NH3 emission by horses. The two-days litter treatment however seems to be too short to gain any positive effects.","PeriodicalId":31709,"journal":{"name":"Ecocycles","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecocycles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19040/ecocycles.v7i2.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main goal of our research was to study the effects of different feed components and the treatment of the litter on the NH3 emission of equine urine. Four adult horses were used in the experiment. The basic diet consisted of 1500 g mashed oat, fed twice a day (morning and evening), and ad libitum hay. During the night the horses were kept separately in concrete floor boxes, the litter was wheat straw. The whole study was divided into 3 main periods. In the first period of the experiment the litter and the floor were treated with a probiotic supplement for two days in the evenings. In the second period of the experiment for 8 days the basic diet was supplemented with 40 ml of probiotic added to the oat. Before the third period of our study the horses were fed with their regular diet for two weeks. After that the oat was changed to a high-protein-value horse feed for 12 days. At the end of the second and third periods, the litter was treated again. Urine contaminated straw samples were collected after each period before and after the litter treatments from different places of the litter in the morning before the daily littering. From the samples, the dry matter content and the NH3 emission were measured. Statistical analysis was carried out with linear modelling. According to our results, both the probiotic treatment of the feed and the high-protein-value horse feed decreased the urine NH3 emission significantly (p<0.05). However, the NH3 emission was only slightly influenced by the litter treatment. Only in the case of probiotic feed supplement could a decrease in emission be detected, but the result was not significant. There was no difference in the dry matter content of the samples. Based on our results, we can conclude that both the high-protein-value horse feed and the probiotic supplement applied in our experiment can be useful to decrease urine NH3 emission by horses. The two-days litter treatment however seems to be too short to gain any positive effects.
不同饲料成分及粪便处理对马尿氨排放的影响
本研究的主要目的是研究不同饲料成分和粪便处理对马尿液NH3排放的影响。实验使用了四匹成年马。基本日粮为1500克燕麦泥,一日两次(早晚两次),外加随意取用干草。晚上,马被单独关在水泥地板上的盒子里,垃圾是麦秸。整个研究分为三个主要阶段。在试验的第一期,在夜间对窝产仔和地板进行两天的益生菌补充处理。第二期试验(8 d)在燕麦基础饲粮中添加40 ml益生菌。在我们研究的第三个阶段之前,马被喂食了两周的正常饮食。之后,将燕麦改为高蛋白价值的马饲料12天。在第二和第三期结束时,再次对幼崽进行处理。在每天扔垃圾前的早晨,在垃圾处理前后的不同时段,从垃圾的不同位置采集尿液污染秸秆样本。测定了样品的干物质含量和NH3排放量。采用线性模型进行统计分析。结果表明,饲料中添加益生菌处理和高蛋白值马饲料均显著降低了尿NH3排放量(p<0.05)。凋落物处理对NH3排放的影响较小。只有在添加益生菌饲料的情况下,可以检测到排放量的减少,但结果并不显著。样品的干物质含量没有差异。综上所述,本试验中添加的高蛋白值马饲料和益生菌均可有效减少马尿氨排放。然而,两天的垃圾处理似乎太短了,无法产生任何积极的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecocycles
Ecocycles Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信