Genius of poetic expression. Part one (Based on the publicistic article by S.N. Sergeev-Tsensky “Gogol as an artist of the word”)

Liudmila E. Khvorova
{"title":"Genius of poetic expression. Part one (Based on the publicistic article by S.N. Sergeev-Tsensky “Gogol as an artist of the word”)","authors":"Liudmila E. Khvorova","doi":"10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-3-561-572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aspect of the “scientific-research dialogue” of the author of this study with the writer of the twentieth century Sergei Nikolaevich Sergeev-Tsensky, his publicistic miniatures “Gogol as an artist of the word” (1952), “Talent and genius” (1957), included in the collection “Work hard and joyfully”. It is emphasized that the writer’s work the of the twentieth century Sergeev-Tsensky was written as a pedagogical parting word to future generations and as a call to cherish and study their native Russian language, to cherish the Russian word on the material of the “genius of artistic expression” Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol. The stylistic and poetic findings of the writer in various stories, in the poem “Dead Souls” and in the dramatic work – the comedy “The Government Inspector” are considered. The ways of creating a literary portrait and landscape, the language system means in depicting the psychological details of the portrait and landscape characteristics of comic heroes (on the example of the portrait of Sobakevich), as well as the speech characteristics of the “The Government Inspector” are investigated. Attention is drawn to Gogol’s techniques of “style play” and some deliberate violations of lexical norms in the construction of portrait characteristics in order to emphasize very significant psychological details. As an addition to Sergeev-Tsensky’s reasoning, the specifics of Gogol’s descriptiveness in the real and the fantastic synthesis are specified on the example of significant details, for example, the story “Viy” from the “Mirgorod” cycle. The fear of the author of “Mirgorod” and “Taras Bulba” of confusion in the minds of the characters of Divine and demonic forces is emphasized.","PeriodicalId":34441,"journal":{"name":"Neofilologiia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neofilologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-3-561-572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the aspect of the “scientific-research dialogue” of the author of this study with the writer of the twentieth century Sergei Nikolaevich Sergeev-Tsensky, his publicistic miniatures “Gogol as an artist of the word” (1952), “Talent and genius” (1957), included in the collection “Work hard and joyfully”. It is emphasized that the writer’s work the of the twentieth century Sergeev-Tsensky was written as a pedagogical parting word to future generations and as a call to cherish and study their native Russian language, to cherish the Russian word on the material of the “genius of artistic expression” Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol. The stylistic and poetic findings of the writer in various stories, in the poem “Dead Souls” and in the dramatic work – the comedy “The Government Inspector” are considered. The ways of creating a literary portrait and landscape, the language system means in depicting the psychological details of the portrait and landscape characteristics of comic heroes (on the example of the portrait of Sobakevich), as well as the speech characteristics of the “The Government Inspector” are investigated. Attention is drawn to Gogol’s techniques of “style play” and some deliberate violations of lexical norms in the construction of portrait characteristics in order to emphasize very significant psychological details. As an addition to Sergeev-Tsensky’s reasoning, the specifics of Gogol’s descriptiveness in the real and the fantastic synthesis are specified on the example of significant details, for example, the story “Viy” from the “Mirgorod” cycle. The fear of the author of “Mirgorod” and “Taras Bulba” of confusion in the minds of the characters of Divine and demonic forces is emphasized.
诗意表达的天才。第一部分(根据岑斯基的宣传文章《作为世界艺术家的果戈理》)
在本研究的作者与二十世纪作家谢尔盖·尼古拉耶维奇·谢尔盖·岑斯基的“科学研究对话”方面,他的宣传微缩作品“果戈理作为世界的艺术家”(1952年),“天才和天才”(1957年)被收录在“努力和快乐地工作”中。文章强调,作家的作品《二十世纪的谢尔盖耶夫·岑斯基》是对后人的教育告别词,是对珍惜和研究母语俄语的号召,是对“艺术表现天才”果戈理这一材料的珍惜。作者在各种故事中的风格和诗歌发现,在诗歌“Dead Souls”和戏剧作品-喜剧“The Government Inspector”中被考虑。考察了文学人物肖像和风景画的创作方式、描写喜剧英雄人物肖像和风景画特征的心理细节的语言系统手段(以索巴克维奇的肖像为例)以及《政府督察员》的言语特征。注意果戈理的“风格游戏”技巧和一些故意违反词汇规范的肖像特征的构建,以强调非常重要的心理细节。作为对Sergeev-Tsensky推理的补充,果戈理在现实与幻想的综合中所具有的描述性的具体细节是通过重要细节的例子来说明的,例如,“Mirgorod”循环中的故事“Viy”。《米尔戈罗德》和《塔拉斯·布尔巴》的作者对神与魔的力量在人物头脑中的混乱的恐惧被强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信