Ukrainian Legislation on National Language Policy and the Reality of Social Processes (1917–2021)

V. I. Mozgovoy
{"title":"Ukrainian Legislation on National Language Policy and the Reality of Social Processes (1917–2021)","authors":"V. I. Mozgovoy","doi":"10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-2-228-242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study of Ukrainian language legislation is determined by its mono-national orientation and social inadequacy. The purpose of the article is to uncover the veiled basis of Ukrainization, starting from its terminological understanding by M. Hrushevsky (1907) to the legal consolidation at the level of state building, which covers three stages: the stage of revolutionary and chaotic Ukrainization (1917–1919), the stage of partial Ukrainization within the USSR (1920–1991), and the stage of full Ukrainization of independent Ukraine (since 1991). The latter demonstrates previously hidden directions and methods of modern Ukrainization – the isolation of territories from the Russian world on the basis of the “national idea”, which requires a separate consideration of the Ukrainian legislation that accompanies this process. From the social point of view, its legitimacy is problematic, as it does not contribute to the development of the national language. The definitions of the main functional components of the national-language policy: the concepts of languages of nationalities, native, state, official, regional and non-territorial languages are offered as tools to preserve its cultural potential. It is proven that the contradiction between their objective nature and the subjectivity of ideological interpretations lead to social conflicts, de-stroying the foundations of the state and law. The conclusion is made that the status of languages in a multinational state is established not by political declarations, but by the idea of cultural po-tential preservation of all national communities, regardless of their residence territory and national linguistic identity of its citizens.","PeriodicalId":34441,"journal":{"name":"Neofilologiia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neofilologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-2-228-242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the study of Ukrainian language legislation is determined by its mono-national orientation and social inadequacy. The purpose of the article is to uncover the veiled basis of Ukrainization, starting from its terminological understanding by M. Hrushevsky (1907) to the legal consolidation at the level of state building, which covers three stages: the stage of revolutionary and chaotic Ukrainization (1917–1919), the stage of partial Ukrainization within the USSR (1920–1991), and the stage of full Ukrainization of independent Ukraine (since 1991). The latter demonstrates previously hidden directions and methods of modern Ukrainization – the isolation of territories from the Russian world on the basis of the “national idea”, which requires a separate consideration of the Ukrainian legislation that accompanies this process. From the social point of view, its legitimacy is problematic, as it does not contribute to the development of the national language. The definitions of the main functional components of the national-language policy: the concepts of languages of nationalities, native, state, official, regional and non-territorial languages are offered as tools to preserve its cultural potential. It is proven that the contradiction between their objective nature and the subjectivity of ideological interpretations lead to social conflicts, de-stroying the foundations of the state and law. The conclusion is made that the status of languages in a multinational state is established not by political declarations, but by the idea of cultural po-tential preservation of all national communities, regardless of their residence territory and national linguistic identity of its citizens.
乌克兰关于民族语言政策和社会进程现实的立法(1917-2021)
乌克兰语立法研究的相关性是由其单一民族倾向和社会不足所决定的。从赫鲁晓夫斯基(1907年)对乌克兰化的术语理解开始,到国家建设层面的法律巩固,揭示了乌克兰化的隐含基础,其中包括三个阶段:革命和混乱的乌克兰化阶段(1917-1919年),苏联内部的部分乌克兰化阶段(1920-1991年)和独立的乌克兰完全乌克兰化阶段(1991年以来)。后者显示了以前隐藏的现代乌克兰化的方向和方法——基于"民族观念"将领土与俄罗斯世界隔离开来,这需要对伴随这一进程的乌克兰立法进行单独审议。从社会的角度来看,它的合法性是有问题的,因为它对民族语言的发展没有贡献。民族语言政策的主要功能组成部分的定义:民族语言、土著语言、国家语言、官方语言、区域语言和非领土语言的概念,作为保存其文化潜力的工具。事实证明,它们的客观性与意识形态解释的主体性之间的矛盾导致了社会冲突,破坏了国家和法律的基础。结论是,在一个多民族国家中,语言的地位不是由政治宣言确立的,而是由所有民族社区的文化潜力保存的理念建立的,而不考虑其居住领土和公民的民族语言身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信