Intermittent fasting for cardiovascular disease risk factor reduction: A narrative review of current evidence

C. Gavaghan, R. Jayasinghe
{"title":"Intermittent fasting for cardiovascular disease risk factor reduction: A narrative review of current evidence","authors":"C. Gavaghan, R. Jayasinghe","doi":"10.21767/AMJ.2018.3485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The metabolic syndrome (MetSy), which is defined by the spectrum of obesity, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia, is recognised as a major contributor to the overall risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Intermittent fasting (IF), which encompasses dieting plans with varying schedules of fasting, may be an effective method of reducing the burden of MetSy and the consequent cardiovascular events in the face of a worsening obesity epidemic in the contemporary society. Aims: Despite the widespread public interest there is a serious lack of scientific understanding of the evidence base and the safe, optimal recommendations. This has created a level of public confusion that we endeavour to address by this narrative review of the published literature. Methods: This narrative literature review summarises the current findings and suggests which regimens may be more effective and where future research in this area should be focused. Results: Although the ideal regimen for IF remains unclear, there is promising evidence that alternate day fasting or modified fasting regimens, paired with or without continuous caloric restriction, may be more effective than continuous caloric restriction alone. Conclusion: IF has been shown in the small number of human clinical trials discussed here to be an alternative to continuous caloric restriction in reducing the factors that contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease. Long-term randomised, controlled trials comparing continual caloric restriction and IF are required to objectively assess energy intake, energy expenditure, adherence, disease outcomes and metabolic factors.","PeriodicalId":46823,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Medical Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"426-433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21767/AMJ.2018.3485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The metabolic syndrome (MetSy), which is defined by the spectrum of obesity, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia, is recognised as a major contributor to the overall risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Intermittent fasting (IF), which encompasses dieting plans with varying schedules of fasting, may be an effective method of reducing the burden of MetSy and the consequent cardiovascular events in the face of a worsening obesity epidemic in the contemporary society. Aims: Despite the widespread public interest there is a serious lack of scientific understanding of the evidence base and the safe, optimal recommendations. This has created a level of public confusion that we endeavour to address by this narrative review of the published literature. Methods: This narrative literature review summarises the current findings and suggests which regimens may be more effective and where future research in this area should be focused. Results: Although the ideal regimen for IF remains unclear, there is promising evidence that alternate day fasting or modified fasting regimens, paired with or without continuous caloric restriction, may be more effective than continuous caloric restriction alone. Conclusion: IF has been shown in the small number of human clinical trials discussed here to be an alternative to continuous caloric restriction in reducing the factors that contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease. Long-term randomised, controlled trials comparing continual caloric restriction and IF are required to objectively assess energy intake, energy expenditure, adherence, disease outcomes and metabolic factors.
间歇性禁食减少心血管疾病危险因素:对当前证据的叙述性回顾
背景:代谢综合征(MetSy)被定义为肥胖、胰岛素抵抗和血脂异常,被认为是导致心血管疾病总体风险的主要因素。间歇性禁食(IF),包括不同时间的节食计划,可能是减轻MetSy负担和随之而来的心血管事件的有效方法,面对当今社会日益严重的肥胖流行病。目的:尽管公众有广泛的兴趣,但对证据基础和安全、最佳建议的科学理解严重缺乏。这造成了一定程度的公众困惑,我们试图通过对已发表文献的叙述性回顾来解决这一问题。方法:这篇叙述性文献综述总结了目前的研究结果,并提出了哪些方案可能更有效,以及该领域未来的研究应该集中在哪里。结果:虽然IF的理想治疗方案尚不清楚,但有希望的证据表明,隔日禁食或改进的禁食方案,配合或不配合持续的热量限制,可能比单独持续的热量限制更有效。结论:本文讨论的少量人体临床试验显示,IF在减少导致心血管疾病发展的因素方面可替代持续热量限制。需要进行长期随机对照试验,比较持续热量限制和IF,以客观评估能量摄入、能量消耗、依从性、疾病结局和代谢因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Medical Journal
Australasian Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信