Propofol-remifentanil is More Effective than Propofol-fentanyl in Decreasing Intraoperative Blood Loss during Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Toshiyuki Handa, Takaaki Onodera, Y. Honda, Y. Koukita, T. Ichinohe
{"title":"Propofol-remifentanil is More Effective than Propofol-fentanyl in Decreasing Intraoperative Blood Loss during Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.","authors":"Toshiyuki Handa, Takaaki Onodera, Y. Honda, Y. Koukita, T. Ichinohe","doi":"10.2209/tdcpublication.2016-0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study retrospectively compared blood loss during sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients receiving propofol-remifentanil (R group) and those receiving propofol-fentanyl (F group). All patients underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy under general anesthesia during the 3-year 4-month period between October 2007 and February 2011 in an operating room at Tokyo Dental College Suidobashi Hospital. Blood loss in the R group was significantly less than that in the F group. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate, measured at 20 and 15 min after tracheal intubation, respectively, were both lower in the R group. No marked change was observed in blood pressure in the R group under general anesthesia, however. Volume of urine was also larger in the R group. The results of this study suggest that remifentanil is effective in reducing intraoperative blood loss during sagittal split ramus osteotomy.","PeriodicalId":45490,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College","volume":"57 3 1","pages":"169-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2209/tdcpublication.2016-0100","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2016-0100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study retrospectively compared blood loss during sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients receiving propofol-remifentanil (R group) and those receiving propofol-fentanyl (F group). All patients underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy under general anesthesia during the 3-year 4-month period between October 2007 and February 2011 in an operating room at Tokyo Dental College Suidobashi Hospital. Blood loss in the R group was significantly less than that in the F group. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate, measured at 20 and 15 min after tracheal intubation, respectively, were both lower in the R group. No marked change was observed in blood pressure in the R group under general anesthesia, however. Volume of urine was also larger in the R group. The results of this study suggest that remifentanil is effective in reducing intraoperative blood loss during sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
异丙酚-瑞芬太尼比异丙酚-芬太尼更有效地减少矢状裂支截骨术中出血量。
本研究回顾性比较了异丙酚-瑞芬太尼治疗组(R组)和异丙酚-芬太尼治疗组(F组)矢状裂支截骨术中的出血量。在2007年10月至2011年2月的3年4个月期间,所有患者在东京牙科学院水桥医院的一间手术室接受了矢状分叉支截骨术。R组出血量明显少于F组。平均动脉压和心率,分别在气管插管后20和15分钟测量,R组均较低。而R组在全麻下血压无明显变化。R组的尿量也较大。本研究结果提示瑞芬太尼可有效减少矢状分叉支截骨术中出血量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College
Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The bulletin of Tokyo Dental collegue is principally for the publication of original contributions to multidisciplinary research in dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信