Participation Rate and Related Factors in Colonoscopy Screening Program in First-Degree Relatives of Patients Affected by Colorectal Cancer

Arezoo Chouhdari, P. Yavari, M. Pourhoseingholi, M. Zali
{"title":"Participation Rate and Related Factors in Colonoscopy Screening Program in First-Degree Relatives of Patients Affected by Colorectal Cancer","authors":"Arezoo Chouhdari, P. Yavari, M. Pourhoseingholi, M. Zali","doi":"10.17795/IJCP-4808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: First-degreerelatives(FDRs)of peoplediagnosedwithcolorectalcancer(CRC)haveatwo-tothree-foldincreasedriskof developingdisease. Colonoscopy screeningtestcanbeeffectiveinpreventionandearlytreatment. Objectives: Thepurposeof thisstudywastodeterminetherateof participationincolonoscopyscreeningtestandrelatedfactorsinfirstdegreerelatives. Methods: 200FDRsof CRCcaseswereinterviewedbytheresearchers.Areliableandvalidquestionnaireaboutundergoingcolonoscopyscreeningtestandbarrierswas filledviaphone. Toreportqualitativedataresults,weusedpercentandproportion. Full(bytotalvariables)andfinal(ForwardLR)multiplelogisticregressionanalysis wereusedtomakeamodelwhichwasexecutedusingspss19. Results: Intotal,59% FDRshadundergonecolonoscopyscreeningtesttothetimeofinterview.Majorreasonsfornotparticipatingwerefearofpain(23%),concernsabout complicationsandtestpositiveresult(21.5%),lackofhealthinsurance(21.5%),notbelievinginthetesteffectiveness(17%),noneedbecauseofhealthyfeeling(13%),embar-rassment(12%)anddistrusttoserviceproviderskills(10%).Resultsofmultiplelogisticregressionanalysisindicatedthereisstatisticalsignificancebetweenparticipatingcolonoscopyscreeningandvariables“notaffectedwithhypertension(95%CI:0.4-2.04,OR=3.7),believeintesteffectivenessinFDRs(95%CI:1.8-16.9,OR=5.6),alsoageofdiagnosis 50inCRCcases(95%CI:1.7-2.3,OR=2)”.Finally,agebelow50(95%CI:1.1-5.1,OR=2.4),notbeingalivepersonaffectedbyCRC(95%CI:1.2-5.8,OR=3.3),monthly familyincome 10millionRials(95%CI:1.08-4.7,OR=2.2)andbelief ineffectivenessof thetest(95%CI:2.61-12.55,OR=5.7)werepredictorfactorstoparticipate. Conclusion: FutureInterventionsshouldfocusonfosteringpositiveattitudes,overcomingbarriers,enhancingsocialandhealthinsurancesupportandfollowingmed- icalrecommendationconsecutivetoperformingcolonoscopyscreeningtest.","PeriodicalId":73510,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of cancer prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of cancer prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/IJCP-4808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: First-degreerelatives(FDRs)of peoplediagnosedwithcolorectalcancer(CRC)haveatwo-tothree-foldincreasedriskof developingdisease. Colonoscopy screeningtestcanbeeffectiveinpreventionandearlytreatment. Objectives: Thepurposeof thisstudywastodeterminetherateof participationincolonoscopyscreeningtestandrelatedfactorsinfirstdegreerelatives. Methods: 200FDRsof CRCcaseswereinterviewedbytheresearchers.Areliableandvalidquestionnaireaboutundergoingcolonoscopyscreeningtestandbarrierswas filledviaphone. Toreportqualitativedataresults,weusedpercentandproportion. Full(bytotalvariables)andfinal(ForwardLR)multiplelogisticregressionanalysis wereusedtomakeamodelwhichwasexecutedusingspss19. Results: Intotal,59% FDRshadundergonecolonoscopyscreeningtesttothetimeofinterview.Majorreasonsfornotparticipatingwerefearofpain(23%),concernsabout complicationsandtestpositiveresult(21.5%),lackofhealthinsurance(21.5%),notbelievinginthetesteffectiveness(17%),noneedbecauseofhealthyfeeling(13%),embar-rassment(12%)anddistrusttoserviceproviderskills(10%).Resultsofmultiplelogisticregressionanalysisindicatedthereisstatisticalsignificancebetweenparticipatingcolonoscopyscreeningandvariables“notaffectedwithhypertension(95%CI:0.4-2.04,OR=3.7),believeintesteffectivenessinFDRs(95%CI:1.8-16.9,OR=5.6),alsoageofdiagnosis 50inCRCcases(95%CI:1.7-2.3,OR=2)”.Finally,agebelow50(95%CI:1.1-5.1,OR=2.4),notbeingalivepersonaffectedbyCRC(95%CI:1.2-5.8,OR=3.3),monthly familyincome 10millionRials(95%CI:1.08-4.7,OR=2.2)andbelief ineffectivenessof thetest(95%CI:2.61-12.55,OR=5.7)werepredictorfactorstoparticipate. Conclusion: FutureInterventionsshouldfocusonfosteringpositiveattitudes,overcomingbarriers,enhancingsocialandhealthinsurancesupportandfollowingmed- icalrecommendationconsecutivetoperformingcolonoscopyscreeningtest.
结直肠癌患者一级亲属结肠镜筛查的参与率及相关因素
背景:诊断为结直肠癌(CRC)的人的一级亲属(FDRs)患病风险增加2 - 3倍。结肠镜检查screeningtestcanbeeffectiveinpreventionandearlytreatment。目的:本研究的目的是确定参与结肠镜筛查的标准相关因素在一级亲属。方法:对200fdr病例进行访谈。Areliableandvalidquestionnaireaboutundergoingcolonoscopyscreeningtestandbarrierswas filledviaphone。Toreportqualitativedataresults weusedpercentandproportion。完整的(bytotalvariables) andfinal (ForwardLR) multiplelogisticregressionanalysis wereusedtomakeamodelwhichwasexecutedusingspss19。结果:FDRshadundergonecolonoscopyscreeningtesttothetimeofinterview.Majorreasonsfornotparticipatingwerefearofpain Intotal, 59%(23%),随着complicationsandtestpositiveresult(21.5%)、lackofhealthinsurance(21.5%)、notbelievinginthetesteffectiveness(17%)、noneedbecauseofhealthyfeeling(13%)、embar-rassment anddistrusttoserviceproviderskills (12%) (10%) .Resultsofmultiplelogisticregressionanalysisindicatedthereisstatisticalsignificancebetweenparticipatingcolonoscopyscreeningandvariables”notaffectedwithhypertension(95%置信区间:0.4—-2.04,或= 3.7),believeintesteffectivenessinFDRs(95%置信区间:1.8—-16.9,或= 5.6),alsoageofdiagnosis最后,年龄在50岁以下(95%CI:1.1-5.1,OR=2.4)、没有活的人受crc影响(95%CI:1.2-5.8,OR=3.3)、家庭月收入1000万里亚尔(95%CI: 1.98 -4.7,OR=2.2)和测试的信念无效(95%CI:2.61-12.55,OR=5.7)是不参与的预测因素。结论:未来的干预措施应注重培养积极的态度,克服障碍,加强社会和健康保障支持,并遵循医学建议,连续进行结肠镜筛查试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信