Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry of the Lumbar Spine but not the Hip: Any Problems with a Swiss Policy?~!2009-08-13~!2009-11-18~!2010-03-05~!

G. Goerres, J. Swanenburg, D. Uebelhart
{"title":"Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry of the Lumbar Spine but not the Hip: Any Problems with a Swiss Policy?~!2009-08-13~!2009-11-18~!2010-03-05~!","authors":"G. Goerres, J. Swanenburg, D. Uebelhart","doi":"10.2174/1876525401002010014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Osteoporosis is a growing healthcare problem in societies with aging populations and DXA is increasingly important to evaluate patients at risk and measure effects of osteoporosis treatment. In Switzerland, as in most Western countries, growing expense of public healthcare forces public authorities to take cost-saving action. The restriction of reimbursement for DXA measurement of the hip might impact negatively on patient care. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of 770 patients (59.3 ± 14.6 years, 14 - 91 years; 91 male and 679 female) and analyzed the proportion of patients with low bone mass as based on DXA measurements of a hip/spine combination of measurements or a single measurement of the lumbar spine. Results: There was a significant number of discordant measurements of T-score values between lumbar spine and total hip compared to concordant measurement results in all patients (p<0.0001) and in postmenopausal women (p<0.0001). Conclusion: DXA measurement of the lumbar spine only may miss correct diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis in a significant number of patients. Therefore, it is important to examine both lumbar spine and hip in order to maintain patient care standards.","PeriodicalId":89634,"journal":{"name":"The Open bone journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"14-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open bone journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876525401002010014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a growing healthcare problem in societies with aging populations and DXA is increasingly important to evaluate patients at risk and measure effects of osteoporosis treatment. In Switzerland, as in most Western countries, growing expense of public healthcare forces public authorities to take cost-saving action. The restriction of reimbursement for DXA measurement of the hip might impact negatively on patient care. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of 770 patients (59.3 ± 14.6 years, 14 - 91 years; 91 male and 679 female) and analyzed the proportion of patients with low bone mass as based on DXA measurements of a hip/spine combination of measurements or a single measurement of the lumbar spine. Results: There was a significant number of discordant measurements of T-score values between lumbar spine and total hip compared to concordant measurement results in all patients (p<0.0001) and in postmenopausal women (p<0.0001). Conclusion: DXA measurement of the lumbar spine only may miss correct diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis in a significant number of patients. Therefore, it is important to examine both lumbar spine and hip in order to maintain patient care standards.
双x线腰椎而非髋关节的吸收测量:瑞士政策有什么问题吗?
骨质疏松症是人口老龄化社会日益严重的医疗保健问题,DXA对于评估骨质疏松症患者的风险和衡量骨质疏松症治疗的效果越来越重要。在瑞士,与大多数西方国家一样,公共保健费用的增加迫使公共当局采取节约成本的行动。限制髋关节DXA测量的报销可能会对患者护理产生负面影响。方法:回顾性分析770例患者(59.3±14.6年,14 ~ 91年;91名男性和679名女性),并基于髋/脊柱组合测量或腰椎单一测量的DXA测量分析低骨量患者的比例。结果:与所有患者(p<0.0001)和绝经后妇女(p<0.0001)的一致测量结果相比,腰椎和全髋关节之间的t评分测量值存在显著数量的不一致(p<0.0001)。结论:在相当数量的患者中,仅腰椎DXA测量可能无法正确诊断骨质减少或骨质疏松症。因此,检查腰椎和髋关节以维持病人的护理标准是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信