The Young's Modulus and Impact Energy Absorption of Wet and Dry Deer Cortical Bone

J. Currey, T. Landete-Castillejos, J. Estevez, Augusto Olguín, Andres J. Garcia, L. Gallego
{"title":"The Young's Modulus and Impact Energy Absorption of Wet and Dry Deer Cortical Bone","authors":"J. Currey, T. Landete-Castillejos, J. Estevez, Augusto Olguín, Andres J. Garcia, L. Gallego","doi":"10.2174/1876525400901010038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have shown recently that antlers of red deer, at the time that they are used in fights in the rut, are essentially dry. We have also shown that dry antler material has a lower impact energy absorption than that of wet antler, a property which, in a fight, is probably very important in the first clashing of antlers. However, dry antler has a much higher Young's modulus (stiffness) than wet antler, and this property will be important in the pushing match that follows the initial impact. These values were compared with those of wet bone, and it was found that although dry antler had a somewhat lower Young's modulus than wet bone, it had a much higher impact energy absorption. In that paper we did not consider the properties of dry bone. We now rectify that. The present paper compares the Young's modulus and impact energy absorption of wet and dry antler with that of wet and dry long bone of deer. It is found that the Young's modulus of dry antler is slightly less (12%) than that of wet long bone, which is in turn slightly less (7%) than that of dry long bone. On the other hand the impact energy absorption of dry antler is much (x6.6) greater than that of wet bone and even greater (x14.3) than that of dry bone. (The impact energy absorption of wet antler could not be measured consistently; it was certainly very high). We suggest that the material properties of antler (which is necessarily dry when used in fights) are superior to those of dry long bone material because, although they have somewhat lower (18%) Young's modulus, they have a much greater (x14) impact energy absorption. The properties of wet long bone and wet antler material are given for comparison, but neither could be used in reality.","PeriodicalId":89634,"journal":{"name":"The Open bone journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open bone journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876525400901010038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

We have shown recently that antlers of red deer, at the time that they are used in fights in the rut, are essentially dry. We have also shown that dry antler material has a lower impact energy absorption than that of wet antler, a property which, in a fight, is probably very important in the first clashing of antlers. However, dry antler has a much higher Young's modulus (stiffness) than wet antler, and this property will be important in the pushing match that follows the initial impact. These values were compared with those of wet bone, and it was found that although dry antler had a somewhat lower Young's modulus than wet bone, it had a much higher impact energy absorption. In that paper we did not consider the properties of dry bone. We now rectify that. The present paper compares the Young's modulus and impact energy absorption of wet and dry antler with that of wet and dry long bone of deer. It is found that the Young's modulus of dry antler is slightly less (12%) than that of wet long bone, which is in turn slightly less (7%) than that of dry long bone. On the other hand the impact energy absorption of dry antler is much (x6.6) greater than that of wet bone and even greater (x14.3) than that of dry bone. (The impact energy absorption of wet antler could not be measured consistently; it was certainly very high). We suggest that the material properties of antler (which is necessarily dry when used in fights) are superior to those of dry long bone material because, although they have somewhat lower (18%) Young's modulus, they have a much greater (x14) impact energy absorption. The properties of wet long bone and wet antler material are given for comparison, but neither could be used in reality.
湿、干鹿皮质骨的杨氏模量和冲击能吸收
我们最近已经证明,马鹿的鹿角,在它们在发情期用来打架的时候,基本上是干的。我们还表明,干鹿角材料比湿鹿角材料具有更低的冲击能量吸收,在战斗中,这一特性在鹿角的第一次碰撞中可能非常重要。然而,干鹿角的杨氏模量(刚度)比湿鹿角高得多,这一特性在初始撞击后的推动匹配中很重要。将这些数值与湿骨进行比较,发现虽然干鹿角的杨氏模量略低于湿骨,但其冲击能吸收要高得多。在那篇论文中,我们没有考虑干骨的性质。我们现在纠正了这一点。本文比较了湿、干鹿角和湿、干鹿长骨的杨氏模量和冲击能吸收。研究发现,干鹿角的杨氏模量略小于湿长骨(12%),湿长骨的杨氏模量略小于干长骨(7%)。另一方面,干鹿角的冲击能吸收比湿骨大得多(x6.6),比干骨大得多(x14.3)。(湿鹿角的冲击吸能测量不一致;这当然是非常高的)。我们认为鹿角(在战斗中使用时必须是干燥的)的材料性能优于干长骨材料,因为尽管它们的杨氏模量稍低(18%),但它们具有更大的(x14)冲击能量吸收。本文给出了湿长骨材料和湿鹿角材料的性能对比,但两者都不能在实际中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信