Tibial Alignment in Total Knee Replacement Surgery, Intramedullary Alignment Versus Extramedullary Alignment a Blinded Single Surgeon Study

Walaa El Nahas, I. Nwachuku, K. Khan, A. Gabr, J. Hodgkinson
{"title":"Tibial Alignment in Total Knee Replacement Surgery, Intramedullary Alignment Versus Extramedullary Alignment a Blinded Single Surgeon Study","authors":"Walaa El Nahas, I. Nwachuku, K. Khan, A. Gabr, J. Hodgkinson","doi":"10.2174/1876525401305010009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The clinical success of total knee arthroplasty is positively correlated with good component orientation. Controversy remains as to what is the best tibial alignment technique, this study compares the intramedullary versus the extramedullary surgical alignment guidance methods. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was done on 100 patients during the time period 2007 to 2010. The knee replacements were performed by the same surgeon, 49 procedures were performed via the intramedullary technique and 51 procedures were via the extramedullary technique. The tibiofemoral angle was measured pre-operatively as well as post operatively, the tibial alignment angle was measured post operatively also, the results were then statistically analysed. Results and Conclusion: There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the tibial alignment angles. Both techniques proved accurate in producing an acceptable post operative tibial component alignment angle. We advocate the surgeon may use his/her discretion when deciding upon the method of tibial alignment.","PeriodicalId":89634,"journal":{"name":"The Open bone journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"9-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open bone journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876525401305010009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The clinical success of total knee arthroplasty is positively correlated with good component orientation. Controversy remains as to what is the best tibial alignment technique, this study compares the intramedullary versus the extramedullary surgical alignment guidance methods. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was done on 100 patients during the time period 2007 to 2010. The knee replacements were performed by the same surgeon, 49 procedures were performed via the intramedullary technique and 51 procedures were via the extramedullary technique. The tibiofemoral angle was measured pre-operatively as well as post operatively, the tibial alignment angle was measured post operatively also, the results were then statistically analysed. Results and Conclusion: There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the tibial alignment angles. Both techniques proved accurate in producing an acceptable post operative tibial component alignment angle. We advocate the surgeon may use his/her discretion when deciding upon the method of tibial alignment.
全膝关节置换术中胫骨对齐,髓内对齐与髓外对齐:单医生盲法研究
背景:全膝关节置换术的临床成功与良好的部件定位呈正相关。关于什么是最好的胫骨对准技术仍然存在争议,本研究比较了髓内和髓外手术对准指导方法。材料与方法:对2007 - 2010年间100例患者进行回顾性研究。膝关节置换术由同一位外科医生进行,其中49例采用髓内技术,51例采用髓外技术。术前、术后测量胫股角,术后测量胫骨对准角,并对结果进行统计学分析。结果与结论:两组患者胫骨对准角度无明显差异。这两种技术都被证明在产生可接受的术后胫骨组件对准角方面是准确的。我们主张外科医生可以使用他/她的自由裁量权时,决定胫骨对准的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信