Comparación psicométrica de las escalas: PAINAD y Abbey Pain Scale en centros sociosanitarios de Barcelona.

Q3 Nursing
Julia González-Vaca, Carmen María Sarabia Cobo, Eva Melendo Azuela
{"title":"Comparación psicométrica de las escalas: PAINAD y Abbey Pain Scale en centros sociosanitarios de Barcelona.","authors":"Julia González-Vaca, Carmen María Sarabia Cobo, Eva Melendo Azuela","doi":"10.20986/MEDPAL.2021.1214/2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: It is estimated that 30░-50░% of people with dementia experience chronic pain in nursing homes in Spain. Despite the fact that there are many validated scales for the assessment of pain in people with dementia, there ́s still no one that can be considered as the gold-standard. Furthermore, there are no studies carried out in this regard in a social and health environment. Therefore, we propose as main objectives the psychometric comparison of the PAINAD scale and the Abbey Pain Scale (ABBEY) in people with dementia in long-term care facilities. Methodology: To achieve the objectives we carried out simultaneously: a psychometric comparison analysis and, a descriptive cross-sectional design. Those over 65 years of age with moderate-severe dementia admitted to social health centers in the Baix Llobregat health area were included. Results: Cronbach's alpha at rest for the PAINAD scale was 0.847 and 0.845 during toilet. For the ABBEY scale, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.728 was obtained at rest and 0.814 during toilet. Both scales showed good concordances, but in the item analysis, the physical changes and the physiological changes of the ABBEY showed very little sensitivity. The prevalence of pain at baseline was 43.9░% and during grooming it was 73.5░%. Conclusions: Both scales maintained good psychomimetric properties but the PAINAD scale is clearly better valued. The prevalence of pain in people with dementia admitted to health centers is 43.9░%. Pain in people with dementia may need to be measured during movement activity to reveal actual pain.","PeriodicalId":49831,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Paliativa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Paliativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20986/MEDPAL.2021.1214/2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: It is estimated that 30░-50░% of people with dementia experience chronic pain in nursing homes in Spain. Despite the fact that there are many validated scales for the assessment of pain in people with dementia, there ́s still no one that can be considered as the gold-standard. Furthermore, there are no studies carried out in this regard in a social and health environment. Therefore, we propose as main objectives the psychometric comparison of the PAINAD scale and the Abbey Pain Scale (ABBEY) in people with dementia in long-term care facilities. Methodology: To achieve the objectives we carried out simultaneously: a psychometric comparison analysis and, a descriptive cross-sectional design. Those over 65 years of age with moderate-severe dementia admitted to social health centers in the Baix Llobregat health area were included. Results: Cronbach's alpha at rest for the PAINAD scale was 0.847 and 0.845 during toilet. For the ABBEY scale, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.728 was obtained at rest and 0.814 during toilet. Both scales showed good concordances, but in the item analysis, the physical changes and the physiological changes of the ABBEY showed very little sensitivity. The prevalence of pain at baseline was 43.9░% and during grooming it was 73.5░%. Conclusions: Both scales maintained good psychomimetric properties but the PAINAD scale is clearly better valued. The prevalence of pain in people with dementia admitted to health centers is 43.9░%. Pain in people with dementia may need to be measured during movement activity to reveal actual pain.
心理测量量表比较:巴塞罗那社会卫生中心的PAINAD和Abbey疼痛量表。
简介:据估计,西班牙有30% - 50%的痴呆患者在养老院经历慢性疼痛。尽管有许多有效的量表来评估痴呆症患者的疼痛,但仍然没有一个可以被认为是黄金标准。此外,没有在社会和卫生环境中进行这方面的研究。因此,我们建议将PAINAD量表与Abbey疼痛量表(Abbey Pain scale)在长期护理机构中痴呆患者的心理测量比较作为主要目标。方法:为了达到目的,我们同时进行了心理测量比较分析和描述性横断面设计。在Baix Llobregat保健区的社会保健中心接受治疗的65岁以上的中重度痴呆症患者也包括在内。结果:如厕时PAINAD量表的Cronbach's alpha值分别为0.847和0.845。ABBEY量表在休息时的Cronbach’s alpha为0.728,如厕时的Cronbach’s alpha为0.814。两种量表的一致性较好,但在项目分析中,ABBEY的物理变化和生理变化的敏感性很低。基线时疼痛发生率为43.9‰,梳洗期间疼痛发生率为73.5‰。结论:两种量表均保持良好的心理测量特性,但PAINAD量表显然更有价值。在保健中心就诊的痴呆患者中,疼痛的患病率为43.9%。痴呆症患者的疼痛可能需要在运动过程中测量,以揭示实际的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina Paliativa
Medicina Paliativa HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicina Paliativa, publicada desde 1994, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Cuidados Paliativos (SECPAL). Medicina Paliativa es una revista trimestral de revisión por pares y sirve a un público interdisciplinario de profesionales, proporcionando un foro para la publicación de manuscritos en español de todas las disciplinas asociadas a los cuidados paliativos y en especial los de carácter multidisciplinar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信