Memory, Identity, and Community: A Creatively Faithful Approach to the Formation of a Theology of Interment.

John J. Slovikovski
{"title":"Memory, Identity, and Community: A Creatively Faithful Approach to the Formation of a Theology of Interment.","authors":"John J. Slovikovski","doi":"10.17688/NTR.V27I1.1029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the die is cast regarding the valid inclusion of cremation in Catholic funeral rites and liturgies given that certain required criteria are met, recent years have given rise to a new problematic regard the treatment of cremains, in particular the assignment of a final resting place.  Recent statistics attest that approximately two-thirds of cremains are not interred by the family members too whom their care is entrusted.  Failure to bury the ashes may not imply a malicious intent on the the part of the faithful who remain; however, such inadvertence implies a lacuna in contemporary thought to articulate a clear theology of interment with sigificant attention to cremains.  Specifically, disregard for the importance of the burial of cremains indicates something of a theological void in three specific areas.  First, casual treatment of the deceased's ashes indicates a failure to be aware of and understand the connection between Christ's burial and our own, most notably in the theological meaning of Christ's rest in the tomb on Holy Saturday.  Second, a covert yet telling misunderstanding of the symbolic role of interment in the theology of the resurrection of the body is subtly communicated by this neglect in the obsequy.  Third, failure to inter a loved one's ashes may supplant the ultimate connection of all the members of the Communion of Saints with the need for a proximate connection of the physical possession of remains.  Accordingly, the present study will suggest anamnesis of Holy Saturday, awareness of the intricacies of the tomb in the theological dynamic of the resurrection of the dead, specifically the contours of resurrected identity , and a refined understanding of the various metaphysical components of the Communion of Saints as a both a pyschological and theological corrective to the need for physical connectedness through personal retention of cremains.  Such an amendatory approach will serve as the foundation for the fuller development of a Catholic Theology of Interment and better understanding of the eschatological context of Catholic funerary practices. Inteneded Audience and Goal of Article:  Graduate Students, Clergy, and Professional Pastoral Ministers who teach, catechize, and minister in the areas of eschatology, liturgy, and bereavement.","PeriodicalId":82116,"journal":{"name":"New theology review","volume":"27 1","pages":"54-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New theology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17688/NTR.V27I1.1029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the die is cast regarding the valid inclusion of cremation in Catholic funeral rites and liturgies given that certain required criteria are met, recent years have given rise to a new problematic regard the treatment of cremains, in particular the assignment of a final resting place.  Recent statistics attest that approximately two-thirds of cremains are not interred by the family members too whom their care is entrusted.  Failure to bury the ashes may not imply a malicious intent on the the part of the faithful who remain; however, such inadvertence implies a lacuna in contemporary thought to articulate a clear theology of interment with sigificant attention to cremains.  Specifically, disregard for the importance of the burial of cremains indicates something of a theological void in three specific areas.  First, casual treatment of the deceased's ashes indicates a failure to be aware of and understand the connection between Christ's burial and our own, most notably in the theological meaning of Christ's rest in the tomb on Holy Saturday.  Second, a covert yet telling misunderstanding of the symbolic role of interment in the theology of the resurrection of the body is subtly communicated by this neglect in the obsequy.  Third, failure to inter a loved one's ashes may supplant the ultimate connection of all the members of the Communion of Saints with the need for a proximate connection of the physical possession of remains.  Accordingly, the present study will suggest anamnesis of Holy Saturday, awareness of the intricacies of the tomb in the theological dynamic of the resurrection of the dead, specifically the contours of resurrected identity , and a refined understanding of the various metaphysical components of the Communion of Saints as a both a pyschological and theological corrective to the need for physical connectedness through personal retention of cremains.  Such an amendatory approach will serve as the foundation for the fuller development of a Catholic Theology of Interment and better understanding of the eschatological context of Catholic funerary practices. Inteneded Audience and Goal of Article:  Graduate Students, Clergy, and Professional Pastoral Ministers who teach, catechize, and minister in the areas of eschatology, liturgy, and bereavement.
记忆、身份与共同体:一种创造性的、忠实的殡葬神学形成途径。
鉴于某些必要的标准已得到满足,在天主教丧葬仪式和礼拜仪式中有效地包括火葬的问题已经确定,但近年来在处理骨灰方面出现了新的问题,特别是在分配最后安息之地方面。最近的统计数据证明,大约三分之二的骨灰没有被委托照顾他们的家庭成员埋葬。未能埋葬骨灰并不意味着留下的信徒有恶意;然而,这样的疏忽意味着当代思想的空白,无法清晰地表达出对遗骸的明确关注。具体来说,无视骨灰埋葬的重要性表明在三个特定领域存在神学空白。首先,对死者骨灰的随意处理表明,他们没有意识到并理解基督的葬礼和我们自己的葬礼之间的联系,最明显的是基督在圣周六在坟墓中安息的神学意义。其次,对身体复活神学中埋葬的象征作用的一种隐蔽但有说服力的误解,通过对葬礼的忽视巧妙地传达出来。第三,未能将至爱之人的骨灰葬在一起,可能会取代圣徒共融会所有成员之间的最终联系,取而代之的是对遗体物质占有的直接联系的需要。因此,本研究将建议对圣周六的记忆,对坟墓在死者复活神学动态中的复杂性的认识,特别是复活身份的轮廓,以及对圣徒共融的各种形象化成分的精确理解,作为心理和神学上的纠正,通过个人保留骨灰来实现身体联系的需要。这种修正的方法将作为更充分发展天主教殡葬神学和更好地理解天主教丧葬实践的末世论背景的基础。读者群:研究生、神职人员和专业牧灵牧师,他们在末世论、礼拜仪式和丧亲之痛等领域教导、讲授教理和事奉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信