Evidence of Daytime Variation of Asymmetric Dimethylarginine: An Intervention Study with Rosiglitazon in Type 2 Diabetes

M. Carlsson, T. Lindström, F. Nystrom, I. Nilsson, L. Brudin, P. Wanby
{"title":"Evidence of Daytime Variation of Asymmetric Dimethylarginine: An Intervention Study with Rosiglitazon in Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"M. Carlsson, T. Lindström, F. Nystrom, I. Nilsson, L. Brudin, P. Wanby","doi":"10.2174/1874216501105010014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) has in some, but not all studies been associated with insulin resistance (IR). We wanted to challenge the hypothesis that plasma ADMA levels are associated with IR in an intervention study using an insulin sensitizing drug. Another aim of the study was to study daytime ADMA variation and if food intake influence ADMA concentration. Methods: Nine patients with diet treated type 2 diabetes were investigated with daytime profiles of ADMA (8 am-5 pm) before and during treatment with rosiglitazone for 8 weeks. A control group matched for age and sex underwent a similar investigation at baseline. Results: After treatment with rosiglitazone, ADMA (0.63- 0.64 � mmol/L; p=0.26) and homocysteine (10.3 -10.6 � mol/L; p=0.61) concentrations did not change. Postprandial (10 am - 5 pm) ADMA concentrations were 10% higher than fasting morning levels (p=0.006) and this difference was similar for controls and diabetes patients both pre and post treatment with rosiglitazone. Conclusions: Treatment with rosiglitazone aiming to improve insulin sensitivity did not affect ADMA concentration in type 2 diabetes patients. The ADMA daytime variation and the relation to food intake appear to be a novel finding and should be considered in future studies.","PeriodicalId":88751,"journal":{"name":"The open endocrinology journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"14-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open endocrinology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874216501105010014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) has in some, but not all studies been associated with insulin resistance (IR). We wanted to challenge the hypothesis that plasma ADMA levels are associated with IR in an intervention study using an insulin sensitizing drug. Another aim of the study was to study daytime ADMA variation and if food intake influence ADMA concentration. Methods: Nine patients with diet treated type 2 diabetes were investigated with daytime profiles of ADMA (8 am-5 pm) before and during treatment with rosiglitazone for 8 weeks. A control group matched for age and sex underwent a similar investigation at baseline. Results: After treatment with rosiglitazone, ADMA (0.63- 0.64 � mmol/L; p=0.26) and homocysteine (10.3 -10.6 � mol/L; p=0.61) concentrations did not change. Postprandial (10 am - 5 pm) ADMA concentrations were 10% higher than fasting morning levels (p=0.006) and this difference was similar for controls and diabetes patients both pre and post treatment with rosiglitazone. Conclusions: Treatment with rosiglitazone aiming to improve insulin sensitivity did not affect ADMA concentration in type 2 diabetes patients. The ADMA daytime variation and the relation to food intake appear to be a novel finding and should be considered in future studies.
不对称二甲基精氨酸白天变化的证据:罗格列酮对2型糖尿病的干预研究
背景:不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)在一些(但不是全部)研究中与胰岛素抵抗(IR)相关。在一项使用胰岛素增敏药物的干预研究中,我们想挑战血浆ADMA水平与IR相关的假设。研究的另一个目的是研究白天ADMA的变化,以及食物摄入是否会影响ADMA的浓度。方法:对9例饮食治疗的2型糖尿病患者在罗格列酮治疗前和治疗期间(上午8点至下午5点)的ADMA日间变化进行研究,为期8周。年龄和性别相匹配的对照组在基线时进行了类似的调查。结果:罗格列酮治疗后,ADMA (0.63 ~ 0.64 mmol/L;p=0.26)和同型半胱氨酸(10.3 -10.6 μ mol/L;P =0.61)浓度无变化。餐后(上午10点至下午5点)ADMA浓度比早晨空腹水平高10% (p=0.006),对照组和糖尿病患者在罗格列酮治疗前后的差异相似。结论:罗格列酮治疗改善胰岛素敏感性对2型糖尿病患者ADMA浓度无影响。ADMA白天的变化及其与食物摄入的关系似乎是一个新的发现,应该在未来的研究中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信