Acceptability of Asking about Indigenous Identity in Health Care Settings

Hazel Williams-Roberts, Erin Beckwell, Lara Murphy, T. Lafontaine, Melanie Brockman, C. Neudorf
{"title":"Acceptability of Asking about Indigenous Identity in Health Care Settings","authors":"Hazel Williams-Roberts, Erin Beckwell, Lara Murphy, T. Lafontaine, Melanie Brockman, C. Neudorf","doi":"10.21767/2049-5471.1000177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This case study assessed the acceptability and experience of being asked a single question about Indigenous self-identity when patients registered at a core neighborhood hospital in a western Canadian province. Registration clerks were trained and requested to ask all patients about their identity during the admission process and record the information in the registration system. The information was used to link patients to cultural support and navigation services. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-nine participants were interviewed to examine perceptions and experiences with being asked about their identity. Descriptive statistics including frequencies and percentages were used to summarize participant demographic characteristics and responses. Chi-squared or Fisher’s Exact tests were used to explore the relationship between demographic characteristics (age, gender, Indigenous identity) and domains of inquiry. A thematic analysis of participants’ responses was also done. Findings: Sixty (23.1%) participants self-identified as Indigenous and just over half (n=134) of all participants were female. Participants supported universally offering the opportunity to disclose their Indigenous identity. However, perceived importance of asking was associated with Indigenous identity (χ2 =16.52, p<0.001) and age (χ2=11.08, p=0.023). Elderly participants and those who did not identify as Indigenous assigned lower importance to asking about Indigenous identity. Among Indigenous participants who had prior negative experiences with the health care system, there were concerns about misuse of information and adverse effects on care. Preferences for how identity information should be collected were influenced by expectations about roles of health care providers and practical considerations. Conclusion: While acceptable, perceived value of collecting self-reported Indigenous identity at registration varies across patient groups. Priority should be given to targeted communication about the rationale for collection of identity information and how it will be used to improve the delivery of care.","PeriodicalId":90151,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and equality in health and care","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21767/2049-5471.1000177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and equality in health and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21767/2049-5471.1000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This case study assessed the acceptability and experience of being asked a single question about Indigenous self-identity when patients registered at a core neighborhood hospital in a western Canadian province. Registration clerks were trained and requested to ask all patients about their identity during the admission process and record the information in the registration system. The information was used to link patients to cultural support and navigation services. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-nine participants were interviewed to examine perceptions and experiences with being asked about their identity. Descriptive statistics including frequencies and percentages were used to summarize participant demographic characteristics and responses. Chi-squared or Fisher’s Exact tests were used to explore the relationship between demographic characteristics (age, gender, Indigenous identity) and domains of inquiry. A thematic analysis of participants’ responses was also done. Findings: Sixty (23.1%) participants self-identified as Indigenous and just over half (n=134) of all participants were female. Participants supported universally offering the opportunity to disclose their Indigenous identity. However, perceived importance of asking was associated with Indigenous identity (χ2 =16.52, p<0.001) and age (χ2=11.08, p=0.023). Elderly participants and those who did not identify as Indigenous assigned lower importance to asking about Indigenous identity. Among Indigenous participants who had prior negative experiences with the health care system, there were concerns about misuse of information and adverse effects on care. Preferences for how identity information should be collected were influenced by expectations about roles of health care providers and practical considerations. Conclusion: While acceptable, perceived value of collecting self-reported Indigenous identity at registration varies across patient groups. Priority should be given to targeted communication about the rationale for collection of identity information and how it will be used to improve the delivery of care.
在卫生保健机构中询问土著身份的可接受性
背景:本案例研究评估了在加拿大西部省份的一家核心社区医院登记的患者被问及关于土著自我认同的单一问题的可接受性和经验。对挂号员进行培训,要求挂号员在入院过程中询问所有患者的身份,并将信息记录在挂号系统中。这些信息被用来将患者与文化支持和导航服务联系起来。方法:对259名参与者进行了访谈,以检查他们被问及身份的看法和经历。使用包括频率和百分比在内的描述性统计来总结参与者的人口统计学特征和反应。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验来探索人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、土著身份)与调查领域之间的关系。还对与会者的答复进行了专题分析。结果:60名(23.1%)参与者自认为是土著居民,超过一半(n=134)的参与者是女性。与会者普遍支持提供公开其土著身份的机会。然而,感知到询问的重要性与土著身份(χ2= 16.52, p<0.001)和年龄(χ2=11.08, p=0.023)相关。年长的参与者和那些不认为自己是土著居民的人对询问土著身份的重要性较低。在先前与卫生保健系统有不良经历的土著参与者中,他们担心信息滥用和对保健的不利影响。对如何收集身份信息的偏好受到对医疗保健提供者角色的期望和实际考虑因素的影响。结论:虽然可以接受,但在登记时收集自我报告的土著身份的感知价值在不同的患者群体中有所不同。应优先考虑有针对性的沟通,说明收集身份信息的理由,以及如何利用这些信息改善医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信