SUMMARIES

Silvia Geraci, J. Derrida, A. Sevenant
{"title":"SUMMARIES","authors":"Silvia Geraci, J. Derrida, A. Sevenant","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.72.3.2141839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Silvia Geraci argues that the biographical references to his Algerian-Jewish descent that appear throughout Derrida's writings serve a strictly philosophical aim. Derrida's reflections on phenomena such as the messianic, the marrano and exemplarity should therefore not be understood as implying that he was struggling to find his way back into the tradition of Judaism. Rather, they represent so many attempts to retrieve conditions, figures, and concepts that are at the root of all monotheistic religions. It is indeed no coincidence, Geraci indicates, that Derrida shows a marked interest for the figure of Abraham, one of the most important patriarchs of Judaism, but at the same time also the founding father of the other monotheistic religions. God's blessing of Abraham, Derrida argued, occurred before they formed an alliance, before their bond was sealed by circumcision, and thus before the foundation of the Law. This other Abraham is a figure that promises the arrival of a universalism beyond Paulinian cosmopolitanism, a universalism that is open to the singularity of the other and thus a universalism that does not project the effacement of difference. Geraci ends her essay with an essential question: is this universalism of the other Abraham a (quasi-)transcendental condition or does it emerge out of the heritage of Judaism? Derrida does not answer this question, but if he nevertheless decides to remain faithful to the tradition of monotheism by retaining the proper name of Abraham for the promise of a universality to come, he is at the same time fully aware of the danger that its provenance could also erase the memory of its concrete theologico-historical inscriptions.","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"72 1","pages":"340 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.72.3.2141839","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.72.3.2141839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Silvia Geraci argues that the biographical references to his Algerian-Jewish descent that appear throughout Derrida's writings serve a strictly philosophical aim. Derrida's reflections on phenomena such as the messianic, the marrano and exemplarity should therefore not be understood as implying that he was struggling to find his way back into the tradition of Judaism. Rather, they represent so many attempts to retrieve conditions, figures, and concepts that are at the root of all monotheistic religions. It is indeed no coincidence, Geraci indicates, that Derrida shows a marked interest for the figure of Abraham, one of the most important patriarchs of Judaism, but at the same time also the founding father of the other monotheistic religions. God's blessing of Abraham, Derrida argued, occurred before they formed an alliance, before their bond was sealed by circumcision, and thus before the foundation of the Law. This other Abraham is a figure that promises the arrival of a universalism beyond Paulinian cosmopolitanism, a universalism that is open to the singularity of the other and thus a universalism that does not project the effacement of difference. Geraci ends her essay with an essential question: is this universalism of the other Abraham a (quasi-)transcendental condition or does it emerge out of the heritage of Judaism? Derrida does not answer this question, but if he nevertheless decides to remain faithful to the tradition of monotheism by retaining the proper name of Abraham for the promise of a universality to come, he is at the same time fully aware of the danger that its provenance could also erase the memory of its concrete theologico-historical inscriptions.
摘要
西尔维娅·杰拉奇(Silvia Geraci)认为,在德里达的作品中出现的关于他的阿尔及利亚犹太血统的传记参考,是为了达到严格的哲学目的。德里达对弥赛亚,马拉诺和典范等现象的反思,因此不应该被理解为暗示他在努力寻找回到犹太教传统的道路。更确切地说,它们代表了许多试图检索条件、数字和概念的尝试,这些都是所有一神教的根源。杰拉奇指出,德里达对亚伯拉罕的形象表现出明显的兴趣,这并非巧合,亚伯拉罕是犹太教最重要的先祖之一,同时也是其他一神论宗教的创始人。德里达认为,上帝对亚伯拉罕的祝福,发生在他们结盟之前,在他们的关系被割礼所封住之前,也就是在律法建立之前。另一个亚伯拉罕是一个超越保利主义世界主义的普遍主义的人物,一个对他者的独特性开放的普遍主义,因此一个不打算消除差异的普遍主义。杰拉奇以一个基本问题结束了她的文章:这种对另一个亚伯拉罕的普遍主义是一种(准)先验的条件,还是它是从犹太教的遗产中产生的?德里达并没有回答这个问题,但如果他仍然决定忠实于一神论的传统,保留亚伯拉罕的正确名字,以承诺一个即将到来的普遍性,他同时也充分意识到它的来源也可能抹去它具体的神学历史铭文的记忆的危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信