PROLONGING THE ITINERARY OF MEANING

M. Cheung
{"title":"PROLONGING THE ITINERARY OF MEANING","authors":"M. Cheung","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.72.4.2152701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is true that Christians regard the Bible as the foundational text for their practice in life, but how can Christians say that their practices are biblically informed without falling into the pitfall of fundamentalism, while still admitting the relevance of the whole Bible in our contemporary world? Moreover, is it possible that biblically informed actions be meaningful not only for Christian communities but also to society in general? With the help of the paradigm of the parable, I would like to show how the appropriation of the biblical text in Christian praxis can be understood as embedding it in their life-narratives. In this way, the biblical text, rather than being taken literally, as in fundamentalist interpretations, is parabolized through an intertextual interpretation which involves an exchange of meaning with the socio-cultural context of the Christian reader. One of the contemporary thinkers who has written extensively on hermeneutics is Paul Ricoeur. He has done significant work on the interpretation of both biblical texts and human action. In this article, I do not aim at giving an overall evaluation of Ricoeur' s various approaches to biblical hermeneutics but try to point out how his work on the parable and the imagination may shed light on a specific problem of Christian praxis that of the appropriation of the Bible in Christian action. 1 To this aim I will bring together two areas of Ricoeur's","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"72 1","pages":"361 - 381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.72.4.2152701","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.72.4.2152701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is true that Christians regard the Bible as the foundational text for their practice in life, but how can Christians say that their practices are biblically informed without falling into the pitfall of fundamentalism, while still admitting the relevance of the whole Bible in our contemporary world? Moreover, is it possible that biblically informed actions be meaningful not only for Christian communities but also to society in general? With the help of the paradigm of the parable, I would like to show how the appropriation of the biblical text in Christian praxis can be understood as embedding it in their life-narratives. In this way, the biblical text, rather than being taken literally, as in fundamentalist interpretations, is parabolized through an intertextual interpretation which involves an exchange of meaning with the socio-cultural context of the Christian reader. One of the contemporary thinkers who has written extensively on hermeneutics is Paul Ricoeur. He has done significant work on the interpretation of both biblical texts and human action. In this article, I do not aim at giving an overall evaluation of Ricoeur' s various approaches to biblical hermeneutics but try to point out how his work on the parable and the imagination may shed light on a specific problem of Christian praxis that of the appropriation of the Bible in Christian action. 1 To this aim I will bring together two areas of Ricoeur's
延长意义的行程
的确,基督徒把《圣经》视为他们生活实践的基础文本,但基督徒怎么能说他们的实践是根据《圣经》而不陷入原教旨主义的陷阱,同时仍然承认整本《圣经》与我们当代世界的相关性呢?此外,是否有可能,符合圣经的行动不仅对基督教社区有意义,而且对整个社会都有意义?在寓言范例的帮助下,我想展示基督教实践中对圣经文本的挪用如何被理解为将其嵌入他们的生活叙事中。通过这种方式,圣经文本,而不是像原教旨主义的解释那样从字面上理解,通过互文解释被抛物线化,这涉及到与基督教读者的社会文化背景的意义交换。保罗·利科是当代在解释学方面著述颇多的思想家之一。他在解释圣经文本和人类行为方面都做了重要的工作。在这篇文章中,我的目的不是全面评价利科尔对圣经解释学的各种方法,而是试图指出他对寓言和想象的研究如何揭示基督教实践的一个具体问题,即基督教行动中对圣经的挪用。为了达到这个目的,我将把Ricoeur的两个领域结合起来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信