Execution in Virginia, 1859: The Trials of Green and Copeland

Steven Lubet
{"title":"Execution in Virginia, 1859: The Trials of Green and Copeland","authors":"Steven Lubet","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2065470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay tells the story of Shields Green and John Copeland, two black men who joined John Brown’s raid on Harper’s Ferry. Along with Brown and several others, Green and Copeland were taken prisoner in the aftermath of the failed insurrection, and they were brought to trial in nearby Charlestown on charges of murder and treason. Unlike Brown, who was treated respectfully by his captors, Green and Copeland were handled roughly. Copeland in particular was subjected to a harsh interrogation that was criticized even by pro-slavery Democrats in the North. The black prisoners did, however, have the benefit of a remarkable attorney – George Sennott of Boston. Unlike virtually all of the other lawyers at the Harper’s Ferry trials, Sennott boldly condemned slavery and announced that he was honored to defend the black insurrectionists. Sennott also employed a creative legal strategy in which he raised the Dred Scott decision as a defense to the treason charge. If black men could not be citizens, he argued, they likewise could not be guilty of treason. The tactic was only partially successful. Green and Copeland were acquitted of treason but convicted nonetheless of murder. Even after pronouncing the death penalty, the Virginia authorities continued their racist treatment of the prisoners. Green and Copeland were executed separately from their white comrades – segregation on the gallows – and their corpses were turned over to medical students for dissection, despite the frantic efforts of Copeland’s family to retrieve his body for decent burial. Throughout his ordeal, and right up until the time he faced the noose, John Copeland held to his ideals. On the morning of his execution he wrote a moving letter to his parents in which he expressed devotion to the “holy cause” for which he would die, while condemning “the demands of the cruel and unjust monster Slavery.”","PeriodicalId":82179,"journal":{"name":"North Carolina law review","volume":"43 1","pages":"1785"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Carolina law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2065470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay tells the story of Shields Green and John Copeland, two black men who joined John Brown’s raid on Harper’s Ferry. Along with Brown and several others, Green and Copeland were taken prisoner in the aftermath of the failed insurrection, and they were brought to trial in nearby Charlestown on charges of murder and treason. Unlike Brown, who was treated respectfully by his captors, Green and Copeland were handled roughly. Copeland in particular was subjected to a harsh interrogation that was criticized even by pro-slavery Democrats in the North. The black prisoners did, however, have the benefit of a remarkable attorney – George Sennott of Boston. Unlike virtually all of the other lawyers at the Harper’s Ferry trials, Sennott boldly condemned slavery and announced that he was honored to defend the black insurrectionists. Sennott also employed a creative legal strategy in which he raised the Dred Scott decision as a defense to the treason charge. If black men could not be citizens, he argued, they likewise could not be guilty of treason. The tactic was only partially successful. Green and Copeland were acquitted of treason but convicted nonetheless of murder. Even after pronouncing the death penalty, the Virginia authorities continued their racist treatment of the prisoners. Green and Copeland were executed separately from their white comrades – segregation on the gallows – and their corpses were turned over to medical students for dissection, despite the frantic efforts of Copeland’s family to retrieve his body for decent burial. Throughout his ordeal, and right up until the time he faced the noose, John Copeland held to his ideals. On the morning of his execution he wrote a moving letter to his parents in which he expressed devotion to the “holy cause” for which he would die, while condemning “the demands of the cruel and unjust monster Slavery.”
1859年弗吉尼亚州的死刑:格林和科普兰的审判
这篇文章讲述了希尔兹·格林和约翰·科普兰的故事,这两个黑人男子加入了约翰·布朗对哈珀渡口的袭击。起义失败后,格林和科普兰与布朗和其他几个人一起被俘,他们被以谋杀和叛国罪带到附近的查尔斯顿受审。布朗受到了抓捕者的尊重,而格林和科普兰则受到了粗暴的对待。尤其是科普兰,他受到了严酷的审讯,甚至受到了北方支持奴隶制的民主党人的批评。然而,黑人囚犯确实受益于一位杰出的律师——波士顿的乔治·塞诺特。与哈珀斯渡口案中几乎所有其他律师不同,塞诺特大胆地谴责奴隶制,并宣布他很荣幸为黑人起义者辩护。塞诺特还采用了一种创造性的法律策略,他将德雷德·斯科特案的判决作为对叛国罪指控的辩护。他认为,如果黑人不能成为公民,他们同样也不能犯叛国罪。这一策略只取得了部分成功。格林和科普兰被判叛国罪不成立,但仍被判谋杀罪。即使在宣布死刑后,弗吉尼亚当局仍继续以种族主义方式对待囚犯。格林和科普兰与他们的白人同志被分开处决——在绞刑架上被隔离——他们的尸体被交给医学院的学生解剖,尽管科普兰的家人疯狂地努力将他的尸体带回体面的葬礼。在他的磨难中,直到他面对绞索的时候,约翰·科普兰一直坚持他的理想。在他被处决的那天早上,他给父母写了一封感人的信,在信中他表达了对他将为之献身的“神圣事业”的忠诚,同时谴责了“残忍和不公正的奴隶怪物的要求”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书