A Mathematical Approach to Design Verification Strategies That Incorporate Corrective Activities as Dedicated Decisions

Peng Xu;Alejandro Salado
{"title":"A Mathematical Approach to Design Verification Strategies That Incorporate Corrective Activities as Dedicated Decisions","authors":"Peng Xu;Alejandro Salado","doi":"10.1109/OJSE.2022.3222731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System verification activities (VAs) are used to identify potential errors and corrective activities (CAs) are used to eliminate those errors. However, existing math-based methods to plan verification strategies do not consider decisions to implement VAs and perform CA jointly, ignoring their close interrelationship. In this article, we present a joint verification–correction model to find optimal joint verification–correction strategies (JVCSs). The model is constructed so that both VAs and CAs can be chosen as dedicated decisions with their own activity spaces. We adopt the belief model of Bayesian networks to represent the impact of VAs and CAs on verification planning and use three value factors to measure the performance of JVCSs. Moreover, we propose an order-based backward induction approach to solve for the optimal JVCS by updating all verification state values. A case study was conducted to show that our model can be applied to effectively solve the verification planning problem.","PeriodicalId":100632,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Systems Engineering","volume":"1 ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/9745883/10043029/09956024.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9956024/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

System verification activities (VAs) are used to identify potential errors and corrective activities (CAs) are used to eliminate those errors. However, existing math-based methods to plan verification strategies do not consider decisions to implement VAs and perform CA jointly, ignoring their close interrelationship. In this article, we present a joint verification–correction model to find optimal joint verification–correction strategies (JVCSs). The model is constructed so that both VAs and CAs can be chosen as dedicated decisions with their own activity spaces. We adopt the belief model of Bayesian networks to represent the impact of VAs and CAs on verification planning and use three value factors to measure the performance of JVCSs. Moreover, we propose an order-based backward induction approach to solve for the optimal JVCS by updating all verification state values. A case study was conducted to show that our model can be applied to effectively solve the verification planning problem.
设计验证策略的数学方法,将纠正活动纳入专门决策
系统验证活动(VA)用于识别潜在错误,纠正活动(CA)用于消除这些错误。然而,现有的基于数学的验证策略规划方法没有考虑实施VA和联合执行CA的决策,忽略了它们之间的密切相互关系。在本文中,我们提出了一个联合验证-校正模型,以找到最佳的联合验证-纠正策略(JVCS)。该模型的构建使得VA和CA都可以被选择为具有自己活动空间的专用决策。我们采用贝叶斯网络的置信模型来表示VA和CA对验证计划的影响,并使用三个价值因素来衡量JVCS的性能。此外,我们提出了一种基于顺序的反向归纳方法,通过更新所有验证状态值来求解最优JVCS。通过实例研究表明,我们的模型可以有效地解决验证计划问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信