Rapid Assessment Procedure as a Tool for Front-End Stakeholder Needs Analysis in Engineering Projects

Casey Gibson;Jessica Smith;Kathleen Smits;Juan Lucena;Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena
{"title":"Rapid Assessment Procedure as a Tool for Front-End Stakeholder Needs Analysis in Engineering Projects","authors":"Casey Gibson;Jessica Smith;Kathleen Smits;Juan Lucena;Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena","doi":"10.1109/OJSE.2023.3275379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Front-end stakeholder needs analysis is increasingly recognized as an essential component of sustainable engineering projects, yet most engineering curricula only cover this topic superficially. Fields such as humanitarian engineering have long recognized the importance of stakeholder needs analysis for the success of development interventions, and researchers have developed best practice frameworks for engaging stakeholders that can be applied to systems engineering. These frameworks rely on established social science techniques, such as ethnography and inductive reasoning, and humanitarian engineering principles, such as contextual listening and sociotechnical thinking, to facilitate comprehensive needs assessments. While conventional ethnographies are often incompatible with engineering projects’ timelines and expertise, anthropologists have developed methodologies to overcome these limitations, such as rapid assessment procedure. While widely applied in the public health sector, rapid assessment procedure has been seldom integrated with engineering projects. Rapid assessment procedure, combined with humanitarian engineering principles, can help researchers quickly gain a nuanced understanding of relevant aspects of complex sociotechnical systems. This article seeks to introduce systems engineers to humanitarian engineering rapid assessment procedure as a concrete technique for conducting comprehensive front-end stakeholder needs analysis. In this article, a case study is presented on the teaching and implementation of humanitarian engineering rapid assessment procedure in a workshop with a group of undergraduate engineering students. We sought to analyze students' perceptions of and learning outcomes from the workshop. Student engagement and learning exceeded expectations, positioning humanitarian engineering rapid assessment procedure as a potentially valuable tool for systems engineers to analyze stakeholder needs to inform system design.","PeriodicalId":100632,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Systems Engineering","volume":"1 ","pages":"68-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/9745883/10043029/10123304.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10123304/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Front-end stakeholder needs analysis is increasingly recognized as an essential component of sustainable engineering projects, yet most engineering curricula only cover this topic superficially. Fields such as humanitarian engineering have long recognized the importance of stakeholder needs analysis for the success of development interventions, and researchers have developed best practice frameworks for engaging stakeholders that can be applied to systems engineering. These frameworks rely on established social science techniques, such as ethnography and inductive reasoning, and humanitarian engineering principles, such as contextual listening and sociotechnical thinking, to facilitate comprehensive needs assessments. While conventional ethnographies are often incompatible with engineering projects’ timelines and expertise, anthropologists have developed methodologies to overcome these limitations, such as rapid assessment procedure. While widely applied in the public health sector, rapid assessment procedure has been seldom integrated with engineering projects. Rapid assessment procedure, combined with humanitarian engineering principles, can help researchers quickly gain a nuanced understanding of relevant aspects of complex sociotechnical systems. This article seeks to introduce systems engineers to humanitarian engineering rapid assessment procedure as a concrete technique for conducting comprehensive front-end stakeholder needs analysis. In this article, a case study is presented on the teaching and implementation of humanitarian engineering rapid assessment procedure in a workshop with a group of undergraduate engineering students. We sought to analyze students' perceptions of and learning outcomes from the workshop. Student engagement and learning exceeded expectations, positioning humanitarian engineering rapid assessment procedure as a potentially valuable tool for systems engineers to analyze stakeholder needs to inform system design.
快速评估程序作为工程项目前端利益相关者需求分析的工具
前端利益相关者需求分析越来越被认为是可持续工程项目的重要组成部分,但大多数工程课程只是肤浅地涵盖了这一主题。人道主义工程等领域长期以来一直认识到利益相关者需求分析对发展干预措施成功的重要性,研究人员已经制定了可应用于系统工程的利益相关者参与的最佳实践框架。这些框架依赖于既定的社会科学技术,如民族志和归纳推理,以及人道主义工程原则,如情境倾听和社会技术思维,以促进全面的需求评估。虽然传统的人种学通常与工程项目的时间表和专业知识不兼容,但人类学家已经开发出了克服这些限制的方法,例如快速评估程序。虽然快速评估程序在公共卫生部门得到了广泛应用,但很少与工程项目相结合。快速评估程序与人道主义工程原理相结合,可以帮助研究人员快速深入了解复杂社会技术系统的相关方面。本文试图向系统工程师介绍人道主义工程快速评估程序,作为进行全面前端利益相关者需求分析的具体技术。本文以工程专业本科生为研究对象,对人道主义工程快速评估程序的教学与实施进行了个案研究。我们试图分析学生对研讨会的看法和学习成果。学生的参与度和学习超出了预期,将人道主义工程快速评估程序定位为系统工程师分析利益相关者需求以告知系统设计的潜在有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信