A Lower Bound on the List-Decodability of Insdel Codes

IF 2.2 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Shu Liu;Ivan Tjuawinata;Chaoping Xing
{"title":"A Lower Bound on the List-Decodability of Insdel Codes","authors":"Shu Liu;Ivan Tjuawinata;Chaoping Xing","doi":"10.1109/TIT.2023.3302862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For codes equipped with metrics such as Hamming metric, symbol pair metric or cover metric, the Johnson bound guarantees list-decodability of such codes. That is, the Johnson bound provides a lower bound on the list-decoding radius of a code in terms of its relative minimum distance \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\delta $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, list size \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$L$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n and the alphabet size \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$q$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n. For study of list-decodability of codes with insertion and deletion errors (we call such codes insdel codes), it is natural to ask the open problem whether there is also a Johnson-type bound. The problem was first investigated by Wachter-Zeh and the result was amended by Hayashi and Yasunaga where a lower bound on the list-decodability for insdel codes was derived. The main purpose of this paper is to move a step further towards solving the above open problem. In this work, we provide a new lower bound for the list-decodability of an insdel code. As a consequence, we show that unlike the Johnson bound for codes under other metrics that is tight, the bound on list-decodability of insdel codes given by Hayashi and Yasunaga is not tight. Our main idea is to show that if an insdel code with a given Levenshtein distance \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$d$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n is not list-decodable with list size \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$L$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, then the list decoding radius is lower bounded by a bound involving \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$L$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n and \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$d$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n. In other words, if the list decoding radius is less than this lower bound, the code must be list-decodable with list size \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$L$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n. At the end of the paper we use such bound to provide an insdel-list-decodability bound for various well-known codes, which has not been extensively studied before.","PeriodicalId":13494,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","volume":"69 11","pages":"6989-7002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10210400/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For codes equipped with metrics such as Hamming metric, symbol pair metric or cover metric, the Johnson bound guarantees list-decodability of such codes. That is, the Johnson bound provides a lower bound on the list-decoding radius of a code in terms of its relative minimum distance $\delta $ , list size $L$ and the alphabet size $q$ . For study of list-decodability of codes with insertion and deletion errors (we call such codes insdel codes), it is natural to ask the open problem whether there is also a Johnson-type bound. The problem was first investigated by Wachter-Zeh and the result was amended by Hayashi and Yasunaga where a lower bound on the list-decodability for insdel codes was derived. The main purpose of this paper is to move a step further towards solving the above open problem. In this work, we provide a new lower bound for the list-decodability of an insdel code. As a consequence, we show that unlike the Johnson bound for codes under other metrics that is tight, the bound on list-decodability of insdel codes given by Hayashi and Yasunaga is not tight. Our main idea is to show that if an insdel code with a given Levenshtein distance $d$ is not list-decodable with list size $L$ , then the list decoding radius is lower bounded by a bound involving $L$ and $d$ . In other words, if the list decoding radius is less than this lower bound, the code must be list-decodable with list size $L$ . At the end of the paper we use such bound to provide an insdel-list-decodability bound for various well-known codes, which has not been extensively studied before.
Insdel码列表可译码性的一个下界
对于配备了诸如Hamming度量、符号对度量或覆盖度量之类的度量的代码,Johnson界保证了这些代码的列表可解码性。也就是说,Johnson界根据代码的相对最小距离$\delta$、列表大小$L$和字母表大小$q$提供了代码的列表解码半径的下界。对于具有插入和删除错误的代码(我们称这种代码为insdel代码)的列表可解码性的研究,很自然地会问开放问题是否也存在Johnson型界。Wachter Zeh首先研究了这个问题,Hayashi和Yasunaga对结果进行了修正,导出了insdel码的列表可解码性的下界。本文的主要目的是进一步解决上述悬而未决的问题。在这项工作中,我们为insdel代码的列表可解码性提供了一个新的下界。因此,我们证明了与其他度量下的码的Johnson界不同的是,Hayashi和Yasunaga给出的insdel码的列表可解性的界是不紧的。我们的主要思想是证明,如果具有给定Levenstein距离$d$的insdel码在列表大小为$L$的情况下不可列表解码,那么列表解码半径是由涉及$L$和$d$边界的下界。换句话说,如果列表解码半径小于此下限,则代码必须是列表大小为$L$的列表可解码代码。在本文的最后,我们使用这样的界来提供各种已知代码的内模列表可解性界,这在以前没有得到广泛的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
514
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Information Theory is a journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers concerned with the transmission, processing, and utilization of information. The boundaries of acceptable subject matter are intentionally not sharply delimited. Rather, it is hoped that as the focus of research activity changes, a flexible policy will permit this Transactions to follow suit. Current appropriate topics are best reflected by recent Tables of Contents; they are summarized in the titles of editorial areas that appear on the inside front cover.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信