Provider Altruism in Incentives Contracts: Medicare’s Quality Race

G. Besstremyannaya, S. Golovan
{"title":"Provider Altruism in Incentives Contracts: Medicare’s Quality Race","authors":"G. Besstremyannaya, S. Golovan","doi":"10.17323/1813-8691-2022-26-3-375-403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes the impact of provider altruism and motivation on the outcomes of pay-for-performance reimbursement in healthcare, where a fixed price contract on quantity is supplemented with a relative performance contract on quail-ty. We develop a theoretical model which forecasts the crowding out of most altruistic providers. Using the example of Medicare’s nationwide natural experiment with a relative performance contract on quality (the data for 3000 acute care hospitals in 2004–2017, with the incentives contract implemented since 2013), we con-duct an empirical test of the model predictions. We assume that altruism is heterogeneous across hospitals and the values of altruism in each hospital are higher for quality measures which are strongly associated with the patient’s benefit. The analysis employs dynamic panel data estimations to account for «habit-formation» and we exclude pre-reform and post-reform «regression-to-the-mean» effects by modeling the time-dependent long-term mean as a function of hospital characteris-________________________________ tics. We focus on highest-quality hospitals and discover a deterioration of quality measures, which may be linked to the patient’s benefit (communication of patients with medical personnel and ability to receive help promptly). It may be interpreted as an illustration of the fact that relative performance incentive contracts may be associated with crowding altruistic providers out of the healthcare market.","PeriodicalId":37657,"journal":{"name":"HSE Economic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSE Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2022-26-3-375-403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper analyzes the impact of provider altruism and motivation on the outcomes of pay-for-performance reimbursement in healthcare, where a fixed price contract on quantity is supplemented with a relative performance contract on quail-ty. We develop a theoretical model which forecasts the crowding out of most altruistic providers. Using the example of Medicare’s nationwide natural experiment with a relative performance contract on quality (the data for 3000 acute care hospitals in 2004–2017, with the incentives contract implemented since 2013), we con-duct an empirical test of the model predictions. We assume that altruism is heterogeneous across hospitals and the values of altruism in each hospital are higher for quality measures which are strongly associated with the patient’s benefit. The analysis employs dynamic panel data estimations to account for «habit-formation» and we exclude pre-reform and post-reform «regression-to-the-mean» effects by modeling the time-dependent long-term mean as a function of hospital characteris-________________________________ tics. We focus on highest-quality hospitals and discover a deterioration of quality measures, which may be linked to the patient’s benefit (communication of patients with medical personnel and ability to receive help promptly). It may be interpreted as an illustration of the fact that relative performance incentive contracts may be associated with crowding altruistic providers out of the healthcare market.
激励契约中的提供者利他主义:医疗保险的质量竞赛
本文分析了在数量固定价格合同与质量相对绩效合同相辅相成的情况下,提供者利他主义和动机对医疗保健按绩效付费补偿结果的影响。我们开发了一个理论模型来预测大多数利他提供者的挤出。以医疗保险全国范围内的质量相对绩效合同自然实验为例(2004-2017年3000家急症护理医院的数据,2013年开始实施激励合同),对模型预测进行了实证检验。我们假设利他主义在医院之间是异质的,每家医院的利他主义价值在与患者利益密切相关的质量措施中更高。分析采用动态面板数据估计来解释“习惯形成”,我们排除了改革前和改革后的“回归均值”效应,通过建模时间依赖的长期均值作为医院特征的函数-________________________________ tics。我们专注于最高质量的医院,发现质量措施的恶化,这可能与患者的利益(患者与医务人员的沟通和及时获得帮助的能力)有关。它可以被解释为一个事实的例证,即相对绩效激励合同可能与将利他提供者挤出医疗保健市场有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HSE Economic Journal
HSE Economic Journal Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The HSE Economic Journal publishes refereed papers both in Russian and English. It has perceived better understanding of the market economy, the Russian one in particular, since being established in 1997. It disseminated new and diverse ideas on economic theory and practice, economic modeling, applied mathematical and statistical methods. Its Editorial Board and Council consist of prominent Russian and foreign researchers whose activity has fostered integration of the world scientific community. The target audience comprises researches, university professors and graduate students. Submitted papers should match JEL classification and can cover country specific or international economic issues, in various areas, such as micro- and macroeconomics, econometrics, economic policy, labor markets, social policy. Apart from supporting high quality economic research and academic discussion the Editorial Board sees its mission in searching for the new authors with original ideas. The journal follows international reviewing practices – at present submitted papers are subject to single blind review of two reviewers. The journal stands for meeting the highest standards of publication ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信