{"title":"On the Interpretation of the Disposable Household Income Statistical Indicator","authors":"Yurii Ivanov, A. Ponomarenko, Aleksandra Sil'chuk","doi":"10.17323/1813-8691-2021-25-2-292-308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, several similar but not identical statistical indicators characterizing the income of the population/households in Russia are published and all of these indicators are more or less official. Namely these are the following indicators: (a) an indicator of the real disposable monetary income of the population, published in all major statistical datasets, usually in the form of corresponding indices and officially used by government agencies;(b) an indicator of gross disposable income of households published in the official statistical yearbook «National accounts of Russia» as an absolute value at current prices; (c) an indicator of real disposable household income published in form of index in the statistical yearbook of the international organization (OECD) based on data for Russia received from Rosstat. The difference between them is that one of them focuses only on monetary incomes, while the other two use the classical interpretation of disposable income used in the system of national accounts, which also includes incomes in kind. There are also differences in approaches to deflation. But, objectively, the simultaneous use of all of these indicators is not so much due to the difference in their content or methodology, but rather to the peculiarities of the organization of the statistical system and the incomplete implementation of the system of national accounts in Russia. However, the simultaneous use of several indicators that are similar in terms of content leads to some confusion among users who do not have special statistical qualifications. The article examines the methodological differences between the indicators listed above, which lead to differences in their size and semantic content, as well as differences in the formats of their publication, and also provides recommendations for their correct use and interpretation.","PeriodicalId":37657,"journal":{"name":"HSE Economic Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSE Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2021-25-2-292-308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Currently, several similar but not identical statistical indicators characterizing the income of the population/households in Russia are published and all of these indicators are more or less official. Namely these are the following indicators: (a) an indicator of the real disposable monetary income of the population, published in all major statistical datasets, usually in the form of corresponding indices and officially used by government agencies;(b) an indicator of gross disposable income of households published in the official statistical yearbook «National accounts of Russia» as an absolute value at current prices; (c) an indicator of real disposable household income published in form of index in the statistical yearbook of the international organization (OECD) based on data for Russia received from Rosstat. The difference between them is that one of them focuses only on monetary incomes, while the other two use the classical interpretation of disposable income used in the system of national accounts, which also includes incomes in kind. There are also differences in approaches to deflation. But, objectively, the simultaneous use of all of these indicators is not so much due to the difference in their content or methodology, but rather to the peculiarities of the organization of the statistical system and the incomplete implementation of the system of national accounts in Russia. However, the simultaneous use of several indicators that are similar in terms of content leads to some confusion among users who do not have special statistical qualifications. The article examines the methodological differences between the indicators listed above, which lead to differences in their size and semantic content, as well as differences in the formats of their publication, and also provides recommendations for their correct use and interpretation.
HSE Economic JournalEconomics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍:
The HSE Economic Journal publishes refereed papers both in Russian and English. It has perceived better understanding of the market economy, the Russian one in particular, since being established in 1997. It disseminated new and diverse ideas on economic theory and practice, economic modeling, applied mathematical and statistical methods. Its Editorial Board and Council consist of prominent Russian and foreign researchers whose activity has fostered integration of the world scientific community. The target audience comprises researches, university professors and graduate students. Submitted papers should match JEL classification and can cover country specific or international economic issues, in various areas, such as micro- and macroeconomics, econometrics, economic policy, labor markets, social policy. Apart from supporting high quality economic research and academic discussion the Editorial Board sees its mission in searching for the new authors with original ideas. The journal follows international reviewing practices – at present submitted papers are subject to single blind review of two reviewers. The journal stands for meeting the highest standards of publication ethics.