Arctic Dreams and Geoengineering Wishes: The Collateral Damage of Climate Change

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
C. Carlarne
{"title":"Arctic Dreams and Geoengineering Wishes: The Collateral Damage of Climate Change","authors":"C. Carlarne","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1924363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moving forward into a post-Kyoto world, policymakers struggle to find effective and equitable solutions, not only for the most basic challenges climate change presents, but also for the secondary problems to which climate change gives rise. After more than twenty years of deliberations, policymakers continue to struggle with the fundamental question of how to use law as a tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Yet, even as these deliberations proceed, more complex derivative questions are identified on a daily basis. These spin-off questions range from well-established concerns about the impact of climate change on biodiversity, human health and human rights, to newer questions about the intersections between climate change law and other areas of law, to critical questions about how climate change is revealing new governance gaps. Many of these collateral questions raise pressing legal and political issues that cannot be resolved through ongoing climate negotiations. This Article examines two particularly important areas in which climate change is exposing fundamental gaps in existing systems of global governance. The first of these is governance of the Arctic Ocean at the edges of the existing regulatory reach of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The second of these is the complete absence, for all practical purposes, of a governance regime applicable to geoengineering research and experimentation. These seemingly distinct issues are examined together for two reasons. First, they raise two of the most pressing global governance challenges today. Second, global efforts to address Arctic and geoengineering governance gaps pose discreet opportunities for the global community to debate, refine and advance the normative framework and institutional structures for management of the global commons. In both contexts, the questions asked and the answers offered will offer insight into larger questions of global environmental governance.","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"49 1","pages":"602-669"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1924363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Moving forward into a post-Kyoto world, policymakers struggle to find effective and equitable solutions, not only for the most basic challenges climate change presents, but also for the secondary problems to which climate change gives rise. After more than twenty years of deliberations, policymakers continue to struggle with the fundamental question of how to use law as a tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Yet, even as these deliberations proceed, more complex derivative questions are identified on a daily basis. These spin-off questions range from well-established concerns about the impact of climate change on biodiversity, human health and human rights, to newer questions about the intersections between climate change law and other areas of law, to critical questions about how climate change is revealing new governance gaps. Many of these collateral questions raise pressing legal and political issues that cannot be resolved through ongoing climate negotiations. This Article examines two particularly important areas in which climate change is exposing fundamental gaps in existing systems of global governance. The first of these is governance of the Arctic Ocean at the edges of the existing regulatory reach of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The second of these is the complete absence, for all practical purposes, of a governance regime applicable to geoengineering research and experimentation. These seemingly distinct issues are examined together for two reasons. First, they raise two of the most pressing global governance challenges today. Second, global efforts to address Arctic and geoengineering governance gaps pose discreet opportunities for the global community to debate, refine and advance the normative framework and institutional structures for management of the global commons. In both contexts, the questions asked and the answers offered will offer insight into larger questions of global environmental governance.
北极梦和地球工程愿望:气候变化的附带损害
进入后《京都议定书》时代,政策制定者们努力寻找有效和公平的解决方案,不仅要解决气候变化带来的最基本挑战,还要解决气候变化引发的次要问题。经过二十多年的深思熟虑,政策制定者仍在努力解决如何利用法律作为减少温室气体排放的工具这一根本问题。然而,即使在进行这些审议的同时,每天还会发现更复杂的衍生问题。这些附带问题的范围从对气候变化对生物多样性、人类健康和人权的影响的既定关切,到关于气候变化法与其他法律领域之间交集的新问题,再到关于气候变化如何揭示新的治理差距的关键问题。这些附带问题中的许多都引发了紧迫的法律和政治问题,无法通过正在进行的气候谈判来解决。本文考察了两个特别重要的领域,在这两个领域,气候变化暴露了现有全球治理体系的根本缺陷。第一个挑战是在《联合国海洋法公约》现有监管范围的边缘对北冰洋进行治理。第二个问题是,出于所有实际目的,完全缺乏适用于地球工程研究和实验的治理机制。出于两个原因,这些看似不同的问题被放在一起研究。首先,它们提出了当今两个最紧迫的全球治理挑战。其次,解决北极和地球工程治理差距的全球努力为国际社会辩论、完善和推进全球公域管理的规范框架和制度结构提供了难得的机会。在这两种情况下,提出的问题和提供的答案将为全球环境治理的更大问题提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Over forty years] ago, under the guidance of the late Professor Wolfgang Friedmann, a group of Columbia law students belonging to the Columbia Society of International Law founded the Bulletin of the Columbia Society of International Law. The Bulletin’s first volume, containing two issues, was a forum for the informal discussion of international legal questions; the second volume, published in 1963 under the title International Law Bulletin, aspired more to the tradition of the scholarly law review. Today’s Columbia Journal of Transnational Law is heir to those early efforts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信