What Would Justice Powell Do? The 'Alien Children' Case and the Meaning of Equal Protection

L. Greenhouse
{"title":"What Would Justice Powell Do? The 'Alien Children' Case and the Meaning of Equal Protection","authors":"L. Greenhouse","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1803609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current immigration debate adds renewed relevance to the Supreme Court's 1982 decision in Plyler v. Doe, holding that a state that provided a free public education to any child had to provide it to all children, including undocumented immigrants. Justice Brennan wrote for a 5-4 Court, with the full, if seemingly unlikely, concurrence of his conservative colleague, Lewis F. Powell Jr. This article tells the back story of how these two very different Justices came to agreement in this important case.","PeriodicalId":81001,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional commentary","volume":"25 1","pages":"29-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional commentary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1803609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The current immigration debate adds renewed relevance to the Supreme Court's 1982 decision in Plyler v. Doe, holding that a state that provided a free public education to any child had to provide it to all children, including undocumented immigrants. Justice Brennan wrote for a 5-4 Court, with the full, if seemingly unlikely, concurrence of his conservative colleague, Lewis F. Powell Jr. This article tells the back story of how these two very different Justices came to agreement in this important case.
鲍威尔法官会怎么做?“外籍儿童”案及其平等保护的意义
目前关于移民问题的辩论与1982年最高法院在普莱勒诉多伊案(Plyler v. Doe)中作出的裁决有新的关联。该裁决认为,一个向任何儿童提供免费公共教育的州,必须向所有儿童提供免费公共教育,包括非法移民。布伦南大法官为5票赞成、4票反对的最高法院做出裁决,他的保守派同事小刘易斯·f·鲍威尔(Lewis F. Powell Jr.)虽然看似不太可能,但完全同意。本文讲述了这两位截然不同的大法官如何在这个重要案件中达成一致的背景故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信