Expert Consensus on Acute Respiratory Failure in Critically III Cancer Patients (2023)

Q2 Medicine
Hai-Jun Wang , Wei Chen , Hong-Zhi Wang , He-Ling Zhao , Dong-Hao Wang , Yun Long , Xue-Zhong Xing , on behalf of the Critical Care Medicine Committee of Beijing Association of Oncology (CCMBAO)
{"title":"Expert Consensus on Acute Respiratory Failure in Critically III Cancer Patients (2023)","authors":"Hai-Jun Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Chen ,&nbsp;Hong-Zhi Wang ,&nbsp;He-Ling Zhao ,&nbsp;Dong-Hao Wang ,&nbsp;Yun Long ,&nbsp;Xue-Zhong Xing ,&nbsp;on behalf of the Critical Care Medicine Committee of Beijing Association of Oncology (CCMBAO)","doi":"10.24920/004203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This consensus aims to provide evidence-based recommendations on common questions in the diagnosis and treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF) for critically ill cancer patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed six clinical questions using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) principle in diagnosis and treatment for critical ill cancer patients with ARF. Based on literature searching and meta-analyses, recommendations were devised. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method was applied to each question to reach consensus in the expert panel.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The panel makes strong recommendations in favor of (1) metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) tests may aid clinicians in rapid diagnosis in critically ill cancer patients suspected of pulmonary infections; (2) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy should not be used as a routine rescue therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill cancer patients but may benefit highly selected patients after multi-disciplinary consultations; (3) cancer patients who have received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy have an increased incidence of pneumonitis compared with standard chemotherapy; (4) critically ill cancer patients who are on invasive mechanical ventilation and estimated to be extubated after 14 days may benefit from early tracheotomy; and (5) high-flow nasal oxygen and noninvasive ventilation therapy can be used as a first-line oxygen strategy for critically ill cancer patients with ARFs. A weak recommendation is: (6) for critically ill cancer patients with ARF caused by tumor compression, urgent chemotherapy may be considered as a rescue therapy only in patients determined to be potentially sensitive to the anticancer therapy after multidisciplinary consultations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The recommendations based on the available evidence can guide diagnosis and treatment in critically ill cancer patients with acute respiratory failure and improve outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35615,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001929423000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This consensus aims to provide evidence-based recommendations on common questions in the diagnosis and treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF) for critically ill cancer patients.

Methods

We developed six clinical questions using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) principle in diagnosis and treatment for critical ill cancer patients with ARF. Based on literature searching and meta-analyses, recommendations were devised. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method was applied to each question to reach consensus in the expert panel.

Results

The panel makes strong recommendations in favor of (1) metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) tests may aid clinicians in rapid diagnosis in critically ill cancer patients suspected of pulmonary infections; (2) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy should not be used as a routine rescue therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill cancer patients but may benefit highly selected patients after multi-disciplinary consultations; (3) cancer patients who have received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy have an increased incidence of pneumonitis compared with standard chemotherapy; (4) critically ill cancer patients who are on invasive mechanical ventilation and estimated to be extubated after 14 days may benefit from early tracheotomy; and (5) high-flow nasal oxygen and noninvasive ventilation therapy can be used as a first-line oxygen strategy for critically ill cancer patients with ARFs. A weak recommendation is: (6) for critically ill cancer patients with ARF caused by tumor compression, urgent chemotherapy may be considered as a rescue therapy only in patients determined to be potentially sensitive to the anticancer therapy after multidisciplinary consultations.

Conclusions

The recommendations based on the available evidence can guide diagnosis and treatment in critically ill cancer patients with acute respiratory failure and improve outcomes.

危重III级癌症患者急性呼吸衰竭专家共识(2023)
目的本共识旨在为危重癌症患者急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)的诊断和治疗中的常见问题提供循证建议。方法应用PICO(群体、干预、比较和结果)原则对危重癌症ARF患者进行诊断和治疗,提出6个临床问题。在文献检索和荟萃分析的基础上,提出了建议。将GRADE(推荐评估、发展和评估分级)方法应用于每个问题,以在专家小组中达成共识。结果该小组强烈建议:(1)宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)测试可能有助于临床医生对怀疑肺部感染的危重癌症患者进行快速诊断;(2) 体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)治疗不应作为危重癌症患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的常规抢救治疗,但可在多学科会诊后使高度选择的患者受益;(3) 与标准化疗相比,接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的癌症患者肺炎发病率增加;(4) 正在接受有创机械通气并估计14天后拔管的癌症危重患者可能受益于早期气管切开术;(5)高流量鼻氧和无创通气治疗可作为危重癌症ARF患者的一线氧气策略。一个较弱的建议是:(6)对于因肿瘤压迫引起的危重癌症ARF患者,只有在多学科咨询后确定对抗癌治疗潜在敏感的患者,才可以考虑将紧急化疗作为抢救性治疗。结论根据现有证据提出的建议可指导危重癌症急性呼吸衰竭患者的诊断和治疗,改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1275
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信