Ascenso y caída del Supermax: cómo el modelo de prisión estadounidense y la política penal ultrapunitiva llegaron a Colombia

IF 0.2 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
J. Cruz, J. Grajales
{"title":"Ascenso y caída del Supermax: cómo el modelo de prisión estadounidense y la política penal ultrapunitiva llegaron a Colombia","authors":"J. Cruz, J. Grajales","doi":"10.15446/cp.v15n29.79734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of the US anti-narcotic program, ‘Plan Colombia’, during the first decade of the 21st century, special agents of the US Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) took position in the heart of the Colombian penitentiary administration. Their task was to lead a profound reform of the sector, based on the US ultra-punitive penal regime and its ‘supermax’ housing units. Based on extensive fieldwork with prison architects, inmates and other actors in the penal systems of the US and Colombia, this paper analyzes how the reform was set up on the ground, shedding light on the partially divergent interests and expectations of both governments within the neocolonial context of ‘Plan Colombia’. We show how, on the one hand, the reform partially succeeded in militarizing carceral life and deurbanizing the prison system, spatially isolating inmates from their social and family environment. On the other hand, we show that the reform eventually failed, for institutional and political reasons, to meet its declared goal of modernizing Colombian prisons. From a more theoretical perspective and drawing on recent literature on the mobility of policies and built forms, the paper argues that the introduction of supermax prisons in Colombia is a striking case where a mobile policy and a traveling architectural type coincided and complemented each other, and suggests that in order to advance our understanding of how space is produced in a global arena, interconnections between circuits of policy and architectural mobilities should be more systematically considered.","PeriodicalId":43019,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia Politica","volume":"15 1","pages":"289-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v15n29.79734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of the US anti-narcotic program, ‘Plan Colombia’, during the first decade of the 21st century, special agents of the US Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) took position in the heart of the Colombian penitentiary administration. Their task was to lead a profound reform of the sector, based on the US ultra-punitive penal regime and its ‘supermax’ housing units. Based on extensive fieldwork with prison architects, inmates and other actors in the penal systems of the US and Colombia, this paper analyzes how the reform was set up on the ground, shedding light on the partially divergent interests and expectations of both governments within the neocolonial context of ‘Plan Colombia’. We show how, on the one hand, the reform partially succeeded in militarizing carceral life and deurbanizing the prison system, spatially isolating inmates from their social and family environment. On the other hand, we show that the reform eventually failed, for institutional and political reasons, to meet its declared goal of modernizing Colombian prisons. From a more theoretical perspective and drawing on recent literature on the mobility of policies and built forms, the paper argues that the introduction of supermax prisons in Colombia is a striking case where a mobile policy and a traveling architectural type coincided and complemented each other, and suggests that in order to advance our understanding of how space is produced in a global arena, interconnections between circuits of policy and architectural mobilities should be more systematically considered.
Supermax的兴衰:美国监狱模式和超纯刑事政策如何来到哥伦比亚
在21世纪的第一个十年里,在美国反毒品计划“哥伦比亚计划”的背景下,美国联邦监狱局(BOP)的特工占据了哥伦比亚监狱管理的核心位置。他们的任务是在美国惩罚性极强的刑罚制度及其“超级监狱”(supermax)的基础上,领导一场深刻的监狱行业改革。基于对美国和哥伦比亚的监狱建筑师、囚犯和其他刑罚系统参与者的广泛实地考察,本文分析了改革是如何在实地建立起来的,揭示了在“哥伦比亚计划”的新殖民主义背景下,两国政府部分不同的利益和期望。一方面,我们展示了改革如何部分成功地使监狱生活军事化,使监狱系统去城市化,在空间上将囚犯与他们的社会和家庭环境隔离开来。另一方面,我们表明,由于体制和政治原因,改革最终未能实现其宣布的使哥伦比亚监狱现代化的目标。从更理论化的角度出发,并借鉴了最近关于政策和建筑形式流动性的文献,本文认为,哥伦比亚引入超级监狱是一个引人注目的案例,其中流动政策和流动建筑类型相互吻合并相辅相成,并建议为了提高我们对如何在全球舞台上产生空间的理解,应该更系统地考虑政策回路和建筑流动之间的相互联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ciencia Politica
Ciencia Politica POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信