Active learning in an online postgraduate research module: Perceptions of accounting students and lecturers

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
G. Steenkamp, O. van Schalkwyk
{"title":"Active learning in an online postgraduate research module: Perceptions of accounting students and lecturers","authors":"G. Steenkamp, O. van Schalkwyk","doi":"10.20853/37-2-4872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chartered accountancy education offered by universities in South Africa has traditionally been characterised by passive face-to-face (F2F) learning approaches. Literature, however, has pointed out that active learning can enhance student learning, engagement, and motivation. Moreover, employing active online learning could facilitate the development of digital and critical thinking competencies in accounting students, the importance of which is increasingly emphasised. In response to this, a more traditional and passive F2F lecture week (as part of a postgraduate course on research in accounting) was redesigned during the COVID-19 pandemic to be presented fully online, based on the active learning principles found in Laurillard’s Six Ways of Learning. A questionnaire was administered to investigate the perceptions of both students and lecturers as to whether the redesign led to improved learning and competency development, and to increased engagement and motivation. Although some students were resistant to the change in learning approach from passive to active, respondents felt that the active learning tasks led to increased engagement and enhanced learning by students. Student resistance should be managed in future redesign processes to minimise the effect thereof on learning outcomes, possibly through change management principles such as purposeful communication regarding the benefits and requirements of active learning. Respondents reported that the online learning environment provided students with increased flexibility, but that this flexibility had to be managed through self-regulation or monitoring by lecturers. Online learning also led to feelings of disconnect (between lecturers and students, within the student group and in relation to the content). Such disconnect could be alleviated by applying a blended learning approach in future, using the advantages of both the F2F and the online environment. The results of this study are important to lecturers seeking to design courses that engage and motivate students, enhance learning, and allow the development of the competencies required of the accountants of the future.","PeriodicalId":44786,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Higher Education","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20853/37-2-4872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Chartered accountancy education offered by universities in South Africa has traditionally been characterised by passive face-to-face (F2F) learning approaches. Literature, however, has pointed out that active learning can enhance student learning, engagement, and motivation. Moreover, employing active online learning could facilitate the development of digital and critical thinking competencies in accounting students, the importance of which is increasingly emphasised. In response to this, a more traditional and passive F2F lecture week (as part of a postgraduate course on research in accounting) was redesigned during the COVID-19 pandemic to be presented fully online, based on the active learning principles found in Laurillard’s Six Ways of Learning. A questionnaire was administered to investigate the perceptions of both students and lecturers as to whether the redesign led to improved learning and competency development, and to increased engagement and motivation. Although some students were resistant to the change in learning approach from passive to active, respondents felt that the active learning tasks led to increased engagement and enhanced learning by students. Student resistance should be managed in future redesign processes to minimise the effect thereof on learning outcomes, possibly through change management principles such as purposeful communication regarding the benefits and requirements of active learning. Respondents reported that the online learning environment provided students with increased flexibility, but that this flexibility had to be managed through self-regulation or monitoring by lecturers. Online learning also led to feelings of disconnect (between lecturers and students, within the student group and in relation to the content). Such disconnect could be alleviated by applying a blended learning approach in future, using the advantages of both the F2F and the online environment. The results of this study are important to lecturers seeking to design courses that engage and motivate students, enhance learning, and allow the development of the competencies required of the accountants of the future.
在线研究生研究模块中的主动学习:会计学生和讲师的看法
南非大学提供的特许会计教育传统上以被动面对面(F2F)学习方式为特征。然而,有文献指出,主动学习可以提高学生的学习能力、参与度和积极性。此外,采用积极的在线学习可以促进会计学生的数字和批判性思维能力的发展,这一点的重要性日益得到强调。为此,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,我们重新设计了一个更传统、更被动的F2F讲座周(作为会计研究研究生课程的一部分),以劳里拉德《六种学习方法》中的主动学习原则为基础,完全在线呈现。一份调查问卷被用来调查学生和讲师对重新设计是否会改善学习和能力发展,以及增加参与度和积极性的看法。虽然有些学生对从被动到主动的学习方式的改变有抵触情绪,但受访者认为主动的学习任务增加了学生的参与度,提高了学生的学习效果。在未来的重新设计过程中,应管理学生的抗拒情绪,以尽量减少其对学习成果的影响,可以通过改变管理原则,例如就主动学习的好处和要求进行有目的的沟通。受访者报告说,在线学习环境为学生提供了更大的灵活性,但这种灵活性必须通过自我调节或教师监督来管理。在线学习也会导致(教师和学生之间、学生群体内部以及与内容的关系)脱节的感觉。这种脱节可以通过在未来应用混合学习方法来缓解,利用F2F和在线环境的优势。本研究的结果对于寻求设计吸引和激励学生,加强学习,并允许未来会计师所需能力发展的课程的讲师很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Journal of Higher Education
South African Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
28.60%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信