K. Brodie, A. Joffe, S. Dukhan, S. Godsell, D. De Klerk, K. Padayachee
{"title":"From pandemic disruption to post-pandemic transformation: New possibilities for teaching in South African higher education","authors":"K. Brodie, A. Joffe, S. Dukhan, S. Godsell, D. De Klerk, K. Padayachee","doi":"10.20853/36-4-5180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has had previously unimaginable and far-reaching effects on higher education globally (Baker et al. 2022; Cranfield et al. 2021; Kara 2021; Le Grange 2020). On top of the widespread loss felt by students and teachers across the world, we have had to make rapid changes to previously taken-for-granted ways of doing, being, learning and teaching (Baker et al. 2022; Cranfield et al. 2021). Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning (ERTL) brought constraints and opportunities, challenges and innovations. This article gives form to the statement: “there is an opportunity in the moment for genuine equity-focused innovation in policy-making, provision and pedagogy” (Czerniewicz et al. 2020). We use a theoretical framework of structure, culture and agency through which to view possibilities for transformation of pedagogy, and a form of semi-autoethnography as methodology. Two lecturers, one in the Humanities (Education) and one in the Life Sciences, wrote extended narratives of their experiences of ERTL and the other authors then posed a series of questions to the story authors, which elicited a set of analytic descriptions and explanations. Through iterations of this analysis, we identified two important themes: attending to students’ socio-emotional needs and developing students’ engagement, self-regulation and reflexivity. The analysis identifies key opportunities and challenges that these required and how they were addressed by the lecturers concerned. Based on the analysis and drawing on Case’s (2015b) argument for an expanded sense of agency for students, we argue that the lecture is a key structural and cultural element of the university space that was disrupted during the pandemic and can be transformed going forward. We thus argue for decentering the lecture. Furthermore, we argue that care and concern for students has not been a primary cultural element of teaching and learning in higher education, for structural reasons, and that it should be an integral part of pedagogies going forward.","PeriodicalId":44786,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Higher Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20853/36-4-5180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had previously unimaginable and far-reaching effects on higher education globally (Baker et al. 2022; Cranfield et al. 2021; Kara 2021; Le Grange 2020). On top of the widespread loss felt by students and teachers across the world, we have had to make rapid changes to previously taken-for-granted ways of doing, being, learning and teaching (Baker et al. 2022; Cranfield et al. 2021). Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning (ERTL) brought constraints and opportunities, challenges and innovations. This article gives form to the statement: “there is an opportunity in the moment for genuine equity-focused innovation in policy-making, provision and pedagogy” (Czerniewicz et al. 2020). We use a theoretical framework of structure, culture and agency through which to view possibilities for transformation of pedagogy, and a form of semi-autoethnography as methodology. Two lecturers, one in the Humanities (Education) and one in the Life Sciences, wrote extended narratives of their experiences of ERTL and the other authors then posed a series of questions to the story authors, which elicited a set of analytic descriptions and explanations. Through iterations of this analysis, we identified two important themes: attending to students’ socio-emotional needs and developing students’ engagement, self-regulation and reflexivity. The analysis identifies key opportunities and challenges that these required and how they were addressed by the lecturers concerned. Based on the analysis and drawing on Case’s (2015b) argument for an expanded sense of agency for students, we argue that the lecture is a key structural and cultural element of the university space that was disrupted during the pandemic and can be transformed going forward. We thus argue for decentering the lecture. Furthermore, we argue that care and concern for students has not been a primary cultural element of teaching and learning in higher education, for structural reasons, and that it should be an integral part of pedagogies going forward.
2019冠状病毒病大流行对全球高等教育产生了前所未有的深远影响(Baker et al. 2022;Cranfield et al. 2021;卡拉2021;《画眉山庄》2020)。除了世界各地的学生和教师普遍感到的损失之外,我们不得不迅速改变以前被认为理所当然的做事、存在、学习和教学方式(Baker et al. 2022;Cranfield et al. 2021)。应急远程教学带来了制约和机遇、挑战和创新。这篇文章给出了以下陈述的形式:“在政策制定、提供和教学方面,目前有机会进行真正以公平为中心的创新”(Czerniewicz et al. 2020)。我们使用结构、文化和代理的理论框架来观察教育学转变的可能性,并使用半自我民族志的形式作为方法论。两位讲师,一位是人文学科(教育)的,另一位是生命科学的,他们写了一篇关于他们在ERTL经历的长篇叙述,其他作者向故事作者提出了一系列问题,这些问题引出了一系列分析性的描述和解释。通过反复分析,我们确定了两个重要的主题:关注学生的社会情感需求,发展学生的参与、自我调节和反思。分析确定了这些需要的主要机会和挑战,以及有关讲师如何处理这些机会和挑战。基于对Case (2015b)关于扩大学生代理意识的分析和借鉴,我们认为讲座是大学空间的关键结构和文化元素,在大流行期间被打乱,可以在未来进行转变。因此,我们主张取消讲课的中心。此外,我们认为,由于结构上的原因,对学生的关心和关心并没有成为高等教育中教与学的主要文化元素,它应该成为未来教学法的一个组成部分。