The limits of a Lockean Environmentalism: God, Human Beings, and Nature in Locke's philosophy

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
H. Sætra
{"title":"The limits of a Lockean Environmentalism: God, Human Beings, and Nature in Locke's philosophy","authors":"H. Sætra","doi":"10.20932/barataria.v0i27.521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"God gave us the Earth, to use and enjoy. So says the Bible, and so says John Locke (1632-1704). The individualism and liberalism in Locke’s philosophy makes it decidedly modern and appealing to us today. However, he often uses God as a source of truth and premises in his arguments. This undermines the modern appearance and leaves us with a philosophy that is at times contradictory, at times brilliant, and at all times fixed to the anthropocentric rail that guides his philosophy. In this article, the element of Locke’s philosophy that concerns humanity’s relationship with the natural world is examined. Particular attention is paid to the value and nature of both biotic and abiotic nature. I argue that the religious aspects of Locke’s philosophy cannot be fully purged in an effort to create a pure rationalist, and this leads me to focus on how the religious aspects relate to Locke’s rationalism, and in particular what implications his combination of philosophy and theology carries for the prospects of a Lockean environmentalism. I conclude that such environmentalism has clear limitations, while still providing certain foundations for the idea of sustainability and scientific conservationism.","PeriodicalId":40715,"journal":{"name":"Barataria-Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias Sociales","volume":"221 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Barataria-Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20932/barataria.v0i27.521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

God gave us the Earth, to use and enjoy. So says the Bible, and so says John Locke (1632-1704). The individualism and liberalism in Locke’s philosophy makes it decidedly modern and appealing to us today. However, he often uses God as a source of truth and premises in his arguments. This undermines the modern appearance and leaves us with a philosophy that is at times contradictory, at times brilliant, and at all times fixed to the anthropocentric rail that guides his philosophy. In this article, the element of Locke’s philosophy that concerns humanity’s relationship with the natural world is examined. Particular attention is paid to the value and nature of both biotic and abiotic nature. I argue that the religious aspects of Locke’s philosophy cannot be fully purged in an effort to create a pure rationalist, and this leads me to focus on how the religious aspects relate to Locke’s rationalism, and in particular what implications his combination of philosophy and theology carries for the prospects of a Lockean environmentalism. I conclude that such environmentalism has clear limitations, while still providing certain foundations for the idea of sustainability and scientific conservationism.
洛克式环境保护主义的局限:洛克哲学中的上帝、人类与自然
上帝给了我们地球,让我们使用和享受。圣经是这么说的,约翰·洛克(1632-1704)也是这么说的。洛克哲学中的个人主义和自由主义使其具有鲜明的现代性,并对今天的我们具有吸引力。然而,他经常使用上帝作为真理的来源和前提在他的论点。这破坏了现代的外观,留给我们的哲学有时是矛盾的,有时是辉煌的,总是固定在人类中心主义的轨道上,指导他的哲学。在这篇文章中,洛克的哲学元素,有关人类与自然世界的关系进行了审查。特别注意的是生物和非生物的价值和性质。我认为,洛克哲学的宗教方面不可能在努力创造一个纯粹的理性主义者的过程中被完全清除,这使我关注宗教方面如何与洛克的理性主义联系起来,特别是他的哲学和神学的结合对洛克环境主义的前景有什么影响。我的结论是,这种环境保护主义有明显的局限性,但仍然为可持续性和科学保护主义的思想提供了一定的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信