Active Control-Group Designs in Cognitive Rehabilitation Trials: A Qualitative Review of Computer-Based Rehabilitation in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury

Katrine Faerk, Andreas Kirknaes, Katrine Svaerke, Andreas Kirknaes Faerk, A. Løkkegaard, H. Christensen, J. Mogensen
{"title":"Active Control-Group Designs in Cognitive Rehabilitation Trials: A Qualitative Review of Computer-Based Rehabilitation in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury","authors":"Katrine Faerk, Andreas Kirknaes, Katrine Svaerke, Andreas Kirknaes Faerk, A. Løkkegaard, H. Christensen, J. Mogensen","doi":"10.17756/jnen.2019-059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: To outline experimental variables of relevance to clinical trials employing active control condition (ACC) designs within cognitive rehabilitation after Acquired Brain Injury (ABI), and to qualitatively review the current methodology of trials within this field. Method: Firstly, experimental variables which evidently impact rehabilitation outcome were outlined, based on the authors’ joint knowledge of the research field. Secondly, clinical trials within cognitive rehabilitation after ABI that employed ACC designs were identified and qualitatively evaluated based on the outlined variables. Due to the breadth of this research field, a focus on computer-based cognitive rehabilitation (CBCR) was chosen. Trials were identified through a systematic search in prespecified scientific databases using prespecified inclusion criteria. Results: 10 experimental variables were identified. Nine trials were included in this review. None of the included trials accounted for all experimental variables in their study design. Conclusion: There are methodological shortcomings in the design of trials using ACC’s within the field of CBCR after ABI. Although this methodological review is limited to a subfield within cognitive rehabilitation research, the conclusions drawn here are believed to generalize to the overall field. The experimental variables outlined here may aid researchers in the design phase of future trials using ACC’s.","PeriodicalId":91755,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurology and experimental neuroscience","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurology and experimental neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17756/jnen.2019-059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To outline experimental variables of relevance to clinical trials employing active control condition (ACC) designs within cognitive rehabilitation after Acquired Brain Injury (ABI), and to qualitatively review the current methodology of trials within this field. Method: Firstly, experimental variables which evidently impact rehabilitation outcome were outlined, based on the authors’ joint knowledge of the research field. Secondly, clinical trials within cognitive rehabilitation after ABI that employed ACC designs were identified and qualitatively evaluated based on the outlined variables. Due to the breadth of this research field, a focus on computer-based cognitive rehabilitation (CBCR) was chosen. Trials were identified through a systematic search in prespecified scientific databases using prespecified inclusion criteria. Results: 10 experimental variables were identified. Nine trials were included in this review. None of the included trials accounted for all experimental variables in their study design. Conclusion: There are methodological shortcomings in the design of trials using ACC’s within the field of CBCR after ABI. Although this methodological review is limited to a subfield within cognitive rehabilitation research, the conclusions drawn here are believed to generalize to the overall field. The experimental variables outlined here may aid researchers in the design phase of future trials using ACC’s.
认知康复试验中的主动对照组设计:后天性脑损伤患者计算机康复的定性回顾
背景和目的:概述在获得性脑损伤(ABI)后认知康复中采用主动控制条件(ACC)设计的临床试验相关的实验变量,并对该领域目前的试验方法进行定性回顾。方法:首先,根据作者对研究领域的共同了解,列出对康复效果有明显影响的实验变量。其次,对ABI后认知康复中采用ACC设计的临床试验进行识别,并根据概述的变量进行定性评估。鉴于这一研究领域的广度,本文选择了基于计算机的认知康复(CBCR)作为研究重点。试验是通过在预先指定的科学数据库中使用预先指定的纳入标准进行系统搜索来确定的。结果:确定了10个实验变量。本综述纳入了9项试验。没有一项纳入的试验在其研究设计中考虑到所有的实验变量。结论:在ABI后CBCR领域使用ACC的试验设计存在方法学上的缺陷。虽然这一方法学综述仅限于认知康复研究的一个分支领域,但这里得出的结论被认为可以推广到整个领域。这里列出的实验变量可能有助于研究人员在未来使用ACC的试验的设计阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信