HASHTAG AS A UNIT OF INTERNET DISCOURSE: COGNITIVE AND PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE

Q3 Arts and Humanities
N. Yudina, O. Seliverstova
{"title":"HASHTAG AS A UNIT OF INTERNET DISCOURSE: COGNITIVE AND PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE","authors":"N. Yudina, O. Seliverstova","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-108-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet discourse is a multifaceted phenomenon studied by a number of sciences from different perspectives. In any type of discourse, the choice of syntactical structure and lexical units is determined by pragmatics of communication and is dependent on the speaker’s intention. The same is true for blogs. This paper undertakes to look into cognitive mechanisms underlying the creation or choice of hashtags in Instagram blogs. The analysis was based on collected corpus of 2000 hashtags including those in English and Russian. Instagram accounts under study included those with the number of followers ranging from 5000 to 200 million. Among them were accounts of celebrities (who are famous due to their profession and take blog as a way of communication with their fans) and “proper” bloggers (whose blogs are their job and main activity). The study resulted in a classification of hashtags distinguished with regard to their form, communicative intention of the author and cognitive mechanisms employed in choosing them. Thus 1) prototype hashtags aim to express involvement or belonging and may be based on the cognitive mechanism of implication; 2) performative hashtags are based on profiling and show intention of highlighting one component of a blogger’s image; 3) imperative hashtags are based on profiling as well and aim to encourage some action on the part of followers; 4) metaphoric hashtags are based on cognitive metaphors and usually serve self-representation; 5) topical hashtags include a number of subtypes and may be based on generalization, perspectivization, focusing or elaboration and serve as topical markers or means of consolidation with other topically related accounts; 6) category hashtags are based on concretization and serve to navigate within one blog; 7) summarizing hashtags are based on inference and aim to provide a summary or a conclusion; 8) metatext hashtags are based on composition and seek to link with already known hashtags adding new characteristics, knowledge or meaning to the precedent message. The choice of hashtags by each blog author appears to be dependent on the number of followers and the type of blog.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-2-108-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Internet discourse is a multifaceted phenomenon studied by a number of sciences from different perspectives. In any type of discourse, the choice of syntactical structure and lexical units is determined by pragmatics of communication and is dependent on the speaker’s intention. The same is true for blogs. This paper undertakes to look into cognitive mechanisms underlying the creation or choice of hashtags in Instagram blogs. The analysis was based on collected corpus of 2000 hashtags including those in English and Russian. Instagram accounts under study included those with the number of followers ranging from 5000 to 200 million. Among them were accounts of celebrities (who are famous due to their profession and take blog as a way of communication with their fans) and “proper” bloggers (whose blogs are their job and main activity). The study resulted in a classification of hashtags distinguished with regard to their form, communicative intention of the author and cognitive mechanisms employed in choosing them. Thus 1) prototype hashtags aim to express involvement or belonging and may be based on the cognitive mechanism of implication; 2) performative hashtags are based on profiling and show intention of highlighting one component of a blogger’s image; 3) imperative hashtags are based on profiling as well and aim to encourage some action on the part of followers; 4) metaphoric hashtags are based on cognitive metaphors and usually serve self-representation; 5) topical hashtags include a number of subtypes and may be based on generalization, perspectivization, focusing or elaboration and serve as topical markers or means of consolidation with other topically related accounts; 6) category hashtags are based on concretization and serve to navigate within one blog; 7) summarizing hashtags are based on inference and aim to provide a summary or a conclusion; 8) metatext hashtags are based on composition and seek to link with already known hashtags adding new characteristics, knowledge or meaning to the precedent message. The choice of hashtags by each blog author appears to be dependent on the number of followers and the type of blog.
标签作为网络话语单位:认知与语用视角
网络话语是一个多学科从不同角度研究的多面现象。在任何类型的语篇中,句法结构和词汇单位的选择都是由语用学决定的,并取决于说话人的意图。博客也是如此。本文致力于研究Instagram博客中标签创建或选择的认知机制。该分析是基于收集的2000个标签语料库,包括英语和俄语的标签。被研究的Instagram账户包括那些拥有5000到2亿粉丝的账户。其中包括名人(因其职业而出名,并以博客作为与粉丝交流的方式)和“正规”博主(博客是他们的工作和主要活动)的账户。该研究根据标签的形式、作者的交际意图和选择标签时使用的认知机制对标签进行了分类。因此,1)原型标签的目的是表达涉入或归属,可能基于暗示的认知机制;2)表现性标签是基于分析和显示意图突出一个博主的形象的一个组成部分;3)命令式标签也基于分析,旨在鼓励关注者采取行动;4)隐喻标签以认知隐喻为基础,通常具有自我表征功能;5)话题标签包括许多子类型,可以基于概括、透视、聚焦或阐述,并作为话题标记或与其他话题相关帐户整合的手段;6)类别标签是基于具体化的,用于在一个博客中导航;7)总结标签基于推理,旨在提供总结或结论;8)元文本标签是基于组合并寻求与已知标签的链接,为先前的消息添加新的特征,知识或含义。每个博客作者对标签的选择似乎取决于关注者的数量和博客的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信