The “Northern” identity of Russia as a subject of civilizational self-criticism (from Pyotr Chaadaev to Vasily Shulgin)

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
A. Kara-Murza
{"title":"The “Northern” identity of Russia as a subject of civilizational self-criticism (from Pyotr Chaadaev to Vasily Shulgin)","authors":"A. Kara-Murza","doi":"10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-2-5-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the question of the evolution of the philosophical and historical views of Russian intellectuals Pyotr Yakovlevich Chaadaev (1794–1856) and Vasily Vi­talievich Shulgin (1878–1976). It is noted that both of them largely depart from the usual definition of the civilizational identity of Russia in the coordinates “West-East” and pre­fer to operate with the dichotomy “North-South”. Revealing the “Northern” identity of Russia, primarily, both Chaadaev (in the nineteenth century) and Shulgin (in the twentieth century) act in the genre of civilizational self-criticism, believing the northern (Nordic) conditionality of our culture is not a dignity, but, on the contrary, a kind of “karma”, a “Сross” that Russia has to carry through centuries of history. P.Ya. Chaadaev focuses his attention primarily on the philosophical and historical aspects of the domestic “North­erners”, defining the Russian North as a place of “solidification” of Western-origin “meanings”. In turn, V.V. Shulgin focuses his attention mainly on the forms of national identity and psychology, considering the domestic “Northerners” as a way of “cooling” (and eventually – extinguishing) the national energy.","PeriodicalId":41795,"journal":{"name":"Filosofskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-2-5-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the question of the evolution of the philosophical and historical views of Russian intellectuals Pyotr Yakovlevich Chaadaev (1794–1856) and Vasily Vi­talievich Shulgin (1878–1976). It is noted that both of them largely depart from the usual definition of the civilizational identity of Russia in the coordinates “West-East” and pre­fer to operate with the dichotomy “North-South”. Revealing the “Northern” identity of Russia, primarily, both Chaadaev (in the nineteenth century) and Shulgin (in the twentieth century) act in the genre of civilizational self-criticism, believing the northern (Nordic) conditionality of our culture is not a dignity, but, on the contrary, a kind of “karma”, a “Сross” that Russia has to carry through centuries of history. P.Ya. Chaadaev focuses his attention primarily on the philosophical and historical aspects of the domestic “North­erners”, defining the Russian North as a place of “solidification” of Western-origin “meanings”. In turn, V.V. Shulgin focuses his attention mainly on the forms of national identity and psychology, considering the domestic “Northerners” as a way of “cooling” (and eventually – extinguishing) the national energy.
俄罗斯作为文明自我批评主体的“北方”认同(从彼得·查达耶夫到瓦西里·舒尔金)
本文考察了俄罗斯知识分子察达耶夫(1794-1856)和舒尔金(1878-1976)的哲学和历史观的演变问题。值得注意的是,两者都在很大程度上偏离了俄罗斯在“西-东”坐标上的文明特性的通常定义,而倾向于使用“南北”二分法。揭示俄罗斯的“北方”身份,主要是Chaadaev(19世纪)和Shulgin(20世纪)的文明自我批评类型,认为我们文化的北方(北欧)条件不是一种尊严,相反,是一种“业力”,一种俄罗斯必须在几个世纪的历史中携带的“Сross”。P.Ya。Chaadaev主要关注国内“北方人”的哲学和历史方面,将俄罗斯北方定义为西方起源“意义”“凝固”的地方。而V.V.舒尔金则主要关注民族认同和民族心理的表现形式,认为国内的“北方人”是一种“冷却”(最终——熄灭)民族能量的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Filosofskii Zhurnal
Filosofskii Zhurnal PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信