УТИЛИТАРИЗМ КАК ФИЛОСОФИЯ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Е. Н. Яркова
{"title":"УТИЛИТАРИЗМ КАК ФИЛОСОФИЯ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ","authors":"Е. Н. Яркова","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2016-5-11-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim . The article is devoted to the representation of utilitarianism as the philosophy of education. The main problem is the relevance of utilitarian strategies for the present stage of development of education in Russia.  Methods, results and scientific novelty. Utilitarianism is presented as an educational strategy, nominating at the forefront the principle of usefulness of education, positioning education as a means of achieving social and individual wellbeing. The author represents the basic principles of utilitarian philosophy, and also reveals how these principles have been refracted in the philosophy of education using the methods of value-semantic reduction and qualitative content analysis. The first part of the article is devoted to the history of utilitarianism as the philosophy of education in the Euro-American pedagogical culture, as well as the analysis of modern utilitarianism as widely existent in this culture of philosophy of education. In the second part of the article the author explicates the role of utilitarianism in the education strategies of the Russian pedagogical culture, past and present.  The main idea of the article is the idea that we have two value-semantic forms of utilitarianism: narrowly understood (tactical) utilitarianism and widespread (strategic) utilitarianism. Within the tactical utilitarianism as socially and/or individually useful education is considered to be vocationalism, claimed the currently market education. This kind of education is characterized by its focus on learning/teaching applied science and recognition of the futility of Sciences fundamental and philosophical. Under the strategic utilitarianism individually and/or socially beneficial is considered: first, the versatile education characterized by its focus on learning/teaching not only applications, but also fundamental and philosophical disciplines, secondly, eclectic education aimed at obtaining different professional competences. Versatile, eclectic education contributes to the development of creative abilities of the person, as well as provides opportunities for occupational mobility in a changing market.  The main conclusion . The author concludes that narrowly understood utilitarianism is destructive because of its focus on instant profit and situational success.","PeriodicalId":44143,"journal":{"name":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-5-11-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim . The article is devoted to the representation of utilitarianism as the philosophy of education. The main problem is the relevance of utilitarian strategies for the present stage of development of education in Russia.  Methods, results and scientific novelty. Utilitarianism is presented as an educational strategy, nominating at the forefront the principle of usefulness of education, positioning education as a means of achieving social and individual wellbeing. The author represents the basic principles of utilitarian philosophy, and also reveals how these principles have been refracted in the philosophy of education using the methods of value-semantic reduction and qualitative content analysis. The first part of the article is devoted to the history of utilitarianism as the philosophy of education in the Euro-American pedagogical culture, as well as the analysis of modern utilitarianism as widely existent in this culture of philosophy of education. In the second part of the article the author explicates the role of utilitarianism in the education strategies of the Russian pedagogical culture, past and present.  The main idea of the article is the idea that we have two value-semantic forms of utilitarianism: narrowly understood (tactical) utilitarianism and widespread (strategic) utilitarianism. Within the tactical utilitarianism as socially and/or individually useful education is considered to be vocationalism, claimed the currently market education. This kind of education is characterized by its focus on learning/teaching applied science and recognition of the futility of Sciences fundamental and philosophical. Under the strategic utilitarianism individually and/or socially beneficial is considered: first, the versatile education characterized by its focus on learning/teaching not only applications, but also fundamental and philosophical disciplines, secondly, eclectic education aimed at obtaining different professional competences. Versatile, eclectic education contributes to the development of creative abilities of the person, as well as provides opportunities for occupational mobility in a changing market.  The main conclusion . The author concludes that narrowly understood utilitarianism is destructive because of its focus on instant profit and situational success.
功利主义作为教育哲学
的目标。本文探讨了功利主义作为教育哲学的表现。主要问题是功利主义战略与现阶段俄罗斯教育发展的相关性。方法、结果与科学新颖性。功利主义作为一种教育策略,将教育的有用性原则放在首位,将教育定位为实现社会和个人福祉的手段。作者阐述了功利主义哲学的基本原则,并运用价值语义还原和定性内容分析的方法揭示了这些原则在教育哲学中的折射。文章第一部分论述了功利主义作为教育哲学在欧美教育文化中的历史,并分析了这种教育哲学文化中广泛存在的现代功利主义。在文章的第二部分,作者阐述了功利主义在过去和现在俄罗斯教育文化的教育策略中的作用。本文的主要思想是认为我们有两种价值语义形式的功利主义:狭义的(战术的)功利主义和广义的(战略的)功利主义。在战术功利主义中,作为对社会和/或个人有用的教育被认为是职业主义,声称当前的市场教育。这种教育的特点是注重学习/教授应用科学,并认识到基础科学和哲学科学的无用性。在战略功利主义下,考虑个人和/或社会利益:第一,以学习/教学为特征的多功能教育,不仅注重应用,而且注重基础和哲学学科;第二,以获得不同的专业能力为目标的折衷教育。多元化、兼收并蓄的教育有助于发展个人的创造能力,并在不断变化的市场中提供职业流动的机会。主要结论。作者的结论是,狭隘理解的功利主义是破坏性的,因为它关注即时利润和情境成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
56
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信