Tempo revisto, tempo reescrito: as metaficções historiográficas / Revised Time, Rewritten Time: Historiographic Metafictions

IF 0.1
Anne Greice Soares La Regina
{"title":"Tempo revisto, tempo reescrito: as metaficções historiográficas / Revised Time, Rewritten Time: Historiographic Metafictions","authors":"Anne Greice Soares La Regina","doi":"10.17851/2238-3824.26.1.129-144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a bibliographic research with a qualitative bias on historiographical metafiction and metabiography in the last two decades of the 20th century, aiming to explain how these narratives arose as responses of art and culture to complex phenomena, determined by a crisis of the modernist regime of historicity that meets resonance also in the postmodernist conceptions that resume discussions about the contradictions of modernism itself and recover the debate about the dichotomy between high arts and mass culture. The postmodernist conjuncture also appears as a space in which debates on issues that emerge from a society strongly marked by global capitalism and communication technologies are established and, producing an information overload, generate the need to organize and apprehend the past, from where the speeches about memory and all interpretations of time arise. This appeal to re-reading ends up producing a poetics of [re]creation that feeds on the cultural residues of the past. As theoretical backbones of the proposed analyses of metafiction, Linda Hutcheon’s work about postmodernist poetics in conjunction with Walter Moser’s concept of historiography is privileged, as well as with the transformations in the historiographic thought promoted by Les Annales and developed by microhistory.","PeriodicalId":40506,"journal":{"name":"Caligrama-Revista de Estudos Romanicos","volume":"26 1","pages":"129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caligrama-Revista de Estudos Romanicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17851/2238-3824.26.1.129-144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a bibliographic research with a qualitative bias on historiographical metafiction and metabiography in the last two decades of the 20th century, aiming to explain how these narratives arose as responses of art and culture to complex phenomena, determined by a crisis of the modernist regime of historicity that meets resonance also in the postmodernist conceptions that resume discussions about the contradictions of modernism itself and recover the debate about the dichotomy between high arts and mass culture. The postmodernist conjuncture also appears as a space in which debates on issues that emerge from a society strongly marked by global capitalism and communication technologies are established and, producing an information overload, generate the need to organize and apprehend the past, from where the speeches about memory and all interpretations of time arise. This appeal to re-reading ends up producing a poetics of [re]creation that feeds on the cultural residues of the past. As theoretical backbones of the proposed analyses of metafiction, Linda Hutcheon’s work about postmodernist poetics in conjunction with Walter Moser’s concept of historiography is privileged, as well as with the transformations in the historiographic thought promoted by Les Annales and developed by microhistory.
修订时间,重写时间:历史元小说/修订时间,重写时间:历史元小说
本文对20世纪最后20年的史学元虚构和元虚构进行了定性研究,旨在解释这些叙事是如何作为艺术和文化对复杂现象的反应而产生的。这是由现代派历史观的危机决定的,这种危机在后现代主义的概念中也得到了共鸣,后现代主义的概念重新讨论了现代主义本身的矛盾,并重新讨论了高雅艺术和大众文化之间的二分法。后现代主义的危机也表现为一个空间,在这个空间中,关于全球资本主义和通信技术强烈标志的社会中出现的问题的辩论得以建立,并产生了信息过载,产生了组织和理解过去的需要,从那里出现了关于记忆的演讲和对时间的所有解释。这种对重新阅读的呼吁最终产生了一种以过去的文化残余为食的[再]创造的诗学。作为元小说分析的理论支柱,琳达·哈钦关于后现代主义诗学的研究与沃尔特·莫泽的史学概念相结合,以及《年鉴》所推动的史学思想的转变和微观史学的发展,都是很有优势的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信