Are You Being Rhetorical? A Description of Rhetorical Move Annotation Tools and Open Corpus of Sample Machine-Annotated Rhetorical Moves

IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Simon Knight, S. Abel, A. Shibani, Yoong Kuan Goh, Rianne Conijn, A. Gibson, Sowmya Vajjala, Elena Cotos, Ágnes Sándor, S. B. Shum
{"title":"Are You Being Rhetorical? A Description of Rhetorical Move Annotation Tools and Open Corpus of Sample Machine-Annotated Rhetorical Moves","authors":"Simon Knight, S. Abel, A. Shibani, Yoong Kuan Goh, Rianne Conijn, A. Gibson, Sowmya Vajjala, Elena Cotos, Ágnes Sándor, S. B. Shum","doi":"10.18608/jla.2020.73.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing analytics has emerged as a sub-field of learning analytics, with applications including the provision of formative feedback to students in developing their writing capacities. Rhetorical markers in writing have become a key feature in this feedback, with a number of tools being developed across research and teaching contexts. However, there is no shared corpus of texts annotated by these tools, nor is it clear how the tool annotations compare. Thus, resources are scarce for comparing tools for both tool development and pedagogic purposes. In this paper, we conduct such a comparison and introduce a sample corpus of texts representative of the particular genres, a subset of which has been annotated using three rhetorical analysis tools (one of which has two versions). This paper aims to provide both a description of the tools and a shared dataset in order to support extensions of existing analyses and tool design in support of writing skill development. We intend the description of these tools, which share a focus on rhetorical structures, alongside the corpus, to be a preliminary step to enable further research, with regard to both tool development and tool interaction","PeriodicalId":36754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Analytics","volume":"7 1","pages":"138-154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2020.73.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Writing analytics has emerged as a sub-field of learning analytics, with applications including the provision of formative feedback to students in developing their writing capacities. Rhetorical markers in writing have become a key feature in this feedback, with a number of tools being developed across research and teaching contexts. However, there is no shared corpus of texts annotated by these tools, nor is it clear how the tool annotations compare. Thus, resources are scarce for comparing tools for both tool development and pedagogic purposes. In this paper, we conduct such a comparison and introduce a sample corpus of texts representative of the particular genres, a subset of which has been annotated using three rhetorical analysis tools (one of which has two versions). This paper aims to provide both a description of the tools and a shared dataset in order to support extensions of existing analyses and tool design in support of writing skill development. We intend the description of these tools, which share a focus on rhetorical structures, alongside the corpus, to be a preliminary step to enable further research, with regard to both tool development and tool interaction
你是在夸夸其谈吗?修辞格标注工具描述及机器标注修辞格样本开放语料库
写作分析已经成为学习分析的一个子领域,其应用包括为学生提供形成性反馈,以发展他们的写作能力。写作中的修辞标记已经成为这种反馈的一个关键特征,在研究和教学环境中开发了许多工具。但是,没有这些工具注释的共享文本语料库,也不清楚工具注释如何比较。因此,用于工具开发和教学目的的比较工具的资源是稀缺的。在本文中,我们进行了这样的比较,并介绍了一个代表特定类型的文本样本语料库,其中一个子集使用三种修辞分析工具进行了注释(其中一个有两个版本)。本文旨在提供工具的描述和共享数据集,以支持现有分析和工具设计的扩展,以支持写作技能的发展。我们打算描述这些工具,它们共同关注修辞结构,以及语料库,作为进一步研究的初步步骤,涉及工具开发和工具交互
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Learning Analytics
Journal of Learning Analytics Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信