Medical organization doctors and policy communities’ influence over Brazilian Health Workforce Policies

H. Pinto, S. Côrtes
{"title":"Medical organization doctors and policy communities’ influence over Brazilian Health Workforce Policies","authors":"H. Pinto, S. Côrtes","doi":"10.1590/0103-1104202313712i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the influence of medical doctors as social actors on developing a policy for the medical workforce in Brazil. The analysis focuses on the years following 2003, when a seeking to include this policy within the scope of the National Health System took office at the Ministry of Health and met with resistance from medical societies. The study adopted sources were process tracing methodology, documents, and interviews. It is based on a neo-institutionalist theoretical approach. Findings reveal long-standing stability (1960-2002) in the policy and its institutional arrangement under the policy community formed by Liberal Medicine advocates (LM-PC); a period (2003-2009) when a thwarted attempt at change by the Ministry of Health met with the opposition of the LM-PC; a period (2010-2016) when such stability was undermined, and the policy was changed despite the opposition of the LM-PC; and, finally, a period when stability was recovered favoring the policy mentioned above community again, reversing several previous changes. However, the LM-PC could not implement its propositions since it faced opposition from other actors influencing the policy. Stability tended towards reproducing the status quo.","PeriodicalId":31225,"journal":{"name":"Saude em Debate","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saude em Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202313712i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the influence of medical doctors as social actors on developing a policy for the medical workforce in Brazil. The analysis focuses on the years following 2003, when a seeking to include this policy within the scope of the National Health System took office at the Ministry of Health and met with resistance from medical societies. The study adopted sources were process tracing methodology, documents, and interviews. It is based on a neo-institutionalist theoretical approach. Findings reveal long-standing stability (1960-2002) in the policy and its institutional arrangement under the policy community formed by Liberal Medicine advocates (LM-PC); a period (2003-2009) when a thwarted attempt at change by the Ministry of Health met with the opposition of the LM-PC; a period (2010-2016) when such stability was undermined, and the policy was changed despite the opposition of the LM-PC; and, finally, a period when stability was recovered favoring the policy mentioned above community again, reversing several previous changes. However, the LM-PC could not implement its propositions since it faced opposition from other actors influencing the policy. Stability tended towards reproducing the status quo.
医疗组织医生和政策团体对巴西卫生人力政策的影响
本文旨在分析医生作为社会行为者在制定巴西医疗劳动力政策方面的影响。分析的重点是2003年之后的几年,当时卫生部开始寻求将这一政策纳入国家卫生系统的范围,但遭到了医学协会的抵制。本研究采用过程追踪法、文献法和访谈法。它是以新制度主义的理论方法为基础的。研究结果显示,在自由医学倡导者(LM-PC)组成的政策共同体下,政策及其制度安排具有长期稳定性(1960-2002);有一段时期(2003-2009年),卫生部的一次改革尝试遭到挫败,遭到了共产党的反对;一段时期(2010-2016年),这种稳定性被破坏,尽管LM-PC反对,政策还是改变了;最后,一段时期恢复了稳定,再次支持上述政策,扭转了之前的一些变化。但是,由于受到影响政策的其他行为者的反对,LM-PC无法实施其主张。稳定倾向于再现现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
164
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书