Unmet needs for community-based physiotherapy services for adults in Canada and the United States: a scoping review protocol

Alison Hock, Justis Beley, M. Bennett, Nick Buitelaar, Amy Connell, K. Rickaby, L. Coman, S. Wojkowski
{"title":"Unmet needs for community-based physiotherapy services for adults in Canada and the United States: a scoping review protocol","authors":"Alison Hock, Justis Beley, M. Bennett, Nick Buitelaar, Amy Connell, K. Rickaby, L. Coman, S. Wojkowski","doi":"10.15761/PMRR.1000210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Healthcare is available through various systems and access points. However, differences in economic status can create disparities in access to healthcare services [1]. It is not the responsibility of a sole proprietor, but rather all countries, to raise more funds, or diversify funding sources, to relieve the burden of unmet needs in healthcare [2]. However, it is the government’s duty to ensure that all public and private healthcare providers operate efficiently to fulfil patient needs [2]. Schneider et al. compared 11 high-income countries on 72 indicators of performance in five domains of healthcare: process, access, administrative efficiency, equity, and outcomes [3]. The United States (US) was ranked last, receiving particularly poor scores in access and affordability. Canada’s results were also substandard, ranking ninth overall, with its worst score in the access domain [3]. Furthermore, the US and Canada were identified as having large disparities in access between lowand high-incomes, particularly due to financial barriers [3]. In this context, patients may choose to forgo treatments or tests, due to associated costs [3].","PeriodicalId":92704,"journal":{"name":"Physical medicine and rehabilitation research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical medicine and rehabilitation research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/PMRR.1000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare is available through various systems and access points. However, differences in economic status can create disparities in access to healthcare services [1]. It is not the responsibility of a sole proprietor, but rather all countries, to raise more funds, or diversify funding sources, to relieve the burden of unmet needs in healthcare [2]. However, it is the government’s duty to ensure that all public and private healthcare providers operate efficiently to fulfil patient needs [2]. Schneider et al. compared 11 high-income countries on 72 indicators of performance in five domains of healthcare: process, access, administrative efficiency, equity, and outcomes [3]. The United States (US) was ranked last, receiving particularly poor scores in access and affordability. Canada’s results were also substandard, ranking ninth overall, with its worst score in the access domain [3]. Furthermore, the US and Canada were identified as having large disparities in access between lowand high-incomes, particularly due to financial barriers [3]. In this context, patients may choose to forgo treatments or tests, due to associated costs [3].
加拿大和美国成人未满足的社区物理治疗服务需求:范围审查方案
医疗保健可通过各种系统和接入点获得。然而,经济地位的差异可能造成在获得保健服务方面的差异[b]。筹集更多资金或使资金来源多样化,以减轻医疗保健需求未得到满足的负担,这不是一个独资经营者的责任,而是所有国家的责任。然而,政府有责任确保所有公共和私人医疗保健提供者有效运作,以满足患者的需求。Schneider等人比较了11个高收入国家在医疗保健五个领域的72个绩效指标:流程、获取、行政效率、公平和结果bbb。美国排名最后,在可及性和可负担性方面得分特别低。加拿大的结果也不合格,总体排名第九,在接入领域得分最低。此外,美国和加拿大被认为在低收入和高收入之间存在巨大差距,特别是由于金融障碍。在这种情况下,由于相关费用100美元,患者可能选择放弃治疗或检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信